Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kstewart33

(6,551 posts)
Wed Jan 3, 2018, 11:56 PM Jan 2018

Washington's growing obsession: The 25th Amendment

Source: Politico

Lawmakers concerned about President Donald Trump’s mental state summoned Yale University psychiatry professor Dr. Bandy X. Lee to Capitol Hill last month for two days of briefings about his recent behavior.

In private meetings with more than a dozen members of Congress held on Dec. 5 and 6, Lee briefed lawmakers — all Democrats except for one Republican senator, whom Lee declined to identify. Her professional warning to Capitol Hill: “He’s going to unravel, and we are seeing the signs.”

In an interview, she pointed to Trump “going back to conspiracy theories, denying things he has admitted before, his being drawn to violent videos.” Lee also warned, “We feel that the rush of tweeting is an indication of his falling apart under stress. Trump is going to get worse and will become uncontainable with the pressures of the presidency.”

The conversation about Trump’s fitness to serve is ongoing — and gaining steam after Trump’s tweet this week taunting the leader of North Korea with my-nuclear-button-is-bigger-than-yours bravado.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/01/03/trump-25th-amendment-mental-health-322625

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Washington's growing obsession: The 25th Amendment (Original Post) kstewart33 Jan 2018 OP
Really Getting Scary....nt global1 Jan 2018 #1
Me too, global. kstewart33 Jan 2018 #2
Stupid RepubliCONs haven't figured out that 25th'ing Trump is their easiest way to limit damage . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2018 #3
Why is it the easiest? onenote Jan 2018 #10
Well, easiest in one sense if they can agree. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2018 #12
Im not sure his true believers understand what is going on with him. Grammy23 Jan 2018 #4
Yes... IthinkThereforeIAM Jan 2018 #6
I think of the RepubliCons as Ferengi and the Trump Gang as Pakleds Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2018 #14
You are not the first one to draw that parallel... IthinkThereforeIAM Jan 2018 #15
'Obsession?' elleng Jan 2018 #5
Indeed. Eating only McDonald because the randomness will prevent poisoning him? question everything Jan 2018 #7
Uh, McDonald's is essentially poison when consumed in that quantity. lagomorph777 Jan 2018 #13
Make him crack! Call him weak! Call him fat! Call him ugly! Still In Wisconsin Jan 2018 #8
I fear the meltdown will be the planet onit2day Jan 2018 #9
SMH - folks really ought to melm00se Jan 2018 #11
Lawmakers got a two-day briefing in December from a psychiatrist about Trump's mental state. mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2018 #16

onenote

(42,714 posts)
10. Why is it the easiest?
Thu Jan 4, 2018, 10:35 AM
Jan 2018

Impeachment requires 1/2 of House and 2/3 of Senate.

25th Amendment requires 2/3 of both.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,007 posts)
12. Well, easiest in one sense if they can agree.
Thu Jan 4, 2018, 12:39 PM
Jan 2018

You are correct if the President objects to removal, which might be likely. However even tRump might be able to read the writing on the wall, in which case a majority of the cabinet can do it.

However, even if tRump forces a 2/3 vote, it might still be easiest on the GOP brand because impeachment and subsequent conviction in the Senate has the stain of wrongdoing.

25th'ing simply says "the man is ill" and admits no wrongdoing.

But of course if Mueller is doing the full and complete job we think he is doing, then it might all be moot and then impeachment would be the easiest on the GOP brand.

Grammy23

(5,810 posts)
4. Im not sure his true believers understand what is going on with him.
Thu Jan 4, 2018, 12:36 AM
Jan 2018

Sadly, they have been so misled by tRump and others that unless he has a complete meltdown, live on camera, they won’t trust any news reports regarding his failing mental state. There could be a considerable portion of the population, although not necessarily tRump supporters, who may have trouble understanding the gravity of the situation. Severe mental issues are hard enough to understand and comprehend when you have basic knowledge of the problem. tRump is so skilled at putting on a game face (while raging behind the scenes) that it will take video proof of his unraveling, I believe, for a sizable number of people to get it.....that he is totally and irrevocably unsuited for the office. And THAT frightens me, too.

IthinkThereforeIAM

(3,076 posts)
6. Yes...
Thu Jan 4, 2018, 12:59 AM
Jan 2018

... and that is why I feel this is just, "talk". They will not do a thing. That is why all the clingons in the Der Dingleberry® universe are being picked off as you read this. Manafort, Flynn...

And then he will resign on his own.

question everything

(47,487 posts)
7. Indeed. Eating only McDonald because the randomness will prevent poisoning him?
Thu Jan 4, 2018, 01:04 AM
Jan 2018

Not allowing the housekeeper to touch his brush?

And, I don't worry. He will have a public meltdown.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
13. Uh, McDonald's is essentially poison when consumed in that quantity.
Thu Jan 4, 2018, 12:44 PM
Jan 2018

It's obvious when you look at his bloated orange corpse-like appearance.

melm00se

(4,993 posts)
11. SMH - folks really ought to
Thu Jan 4, 2018, 10:39 AM
Jan 2018

I don't know, actually READ the 25th Amendment.

Bearing that in mind, here is the text of the 25th Amendment:

Section 1. In case of the removal of the President from office or of his death or resignation, the Vice President shall become President.

Section 2. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

Section 3. Whenever the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that he is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, and until he transmits to them a written declaration to the contrary, such powers and duties shall be discharged by the Vice President as Acting President.

Section 4. Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.


The salient portion for removing the President is Section 4 so lets distill this section down:

What is needed to start the process?

The Vice President and the majority of the executive departments (or other body as established by Congress) notifies the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House that the President is unable to discharge the duties of the office of the President.

OK, they did that, now what?

The Vice President assumes the role of President until such time as the President notifies President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House that the President is able to discharge the Presidential duties and upon doing so, the President is back being the President again.

What happens if the Vice President and the majority of the executive departments (or other body as established by Congress) disagree with the President?

The process starts all over again. The Vice President and the majority of the executive departments (or other body as established by Congress) notifies the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House that the President, despite his notification, is still unable to perform Presidential duties.

OK, the second notification was sent, now what?

Congress then will act to decide the issue. If Congress is in session, they have 48 hours to assemble and start the process (see next section) or, if not in session, 21 days to assemble.

The Avengers...oops, the House and Senate have assembled

If, after debating the issue, a vote is called for and if 2/3's of the House AND 2/3's of the Senate vote agreeing with the Vice President et al, the President is removed from office. If that threshold is not met, then the President stays.

Wait...2/3s of both the House AND Senate? Isn't that a steeper requirement slope than simple impeachment?

Well done grasshopper! Yes, it certainly is. To remove via impeachment requires only a simple majority in the House and a 2/3s vote in the Senate.

So why the steeper requirement?

This process was never intended to be used as a palace coup by the president's advisers to remove the President nor was it intended to replace the existing impeachment process thus the steeper requirements.

This section (#4) of the Amendment was put in because of 2 20th century Presidential issues and a Constitutional ommission:

Woodrow Wilson

On September 25, 1919, Wilson collapsed from the last of a series of strokes. He was incapacitated and unable to perform his presidential duties (which is one of the reasons that the League of Nations didn't pass as Wilson couldn't take direct action to secure its passage). His wife, essentially, directed presidential policy when, it would have been better if the Vice President had done so.

John F Kennedy

There was some concern, post assassination, what if Kennedy had survived his head wound but been in a persistent vegetative state? Who would have had the Constitutional authority to act as President?

Ommission

Until the 25th Amendment, the only ways that the Presidential office changed hands were via:
- Election
- Death
- Impeachment
As such, after being faced with Wilson and Kennedy, Congress and the states concluded that there had to be a 4th way in case of permanent presidential disability so along came the 25th Amendment.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,489 posts)
16. Lawmakers got a two-day briefing in December from a psychiatrist about Trump's mental state.
Thu Jan 4, 2018, 02:47 PM
Jan 2018
WHOA



Lawmakers got a two-day briefing in December from a psychiatrist about Trumps mental stateTWO DAYS



Lawmakers got a two-day briefing in December from a psychiatrist about Trump's mental state—TWO DAYS

By Kerry Eleveld
Wednesday Jan 03, 2018 · 10:16 PM EST

Capitol Hill lawmakers are reportedly harboring a "growing obsession" with the 25th Amendment following Donald Trump’s “nuclear button” meltdown this week. The renewed interest comes after a bipartisan cohort sought out advice last month from a Yale psychiatrist, Dr. Bandy X. Lee, who has been sounding the alarm bells about Donald Trump's mental state for months. Politico’s Annie Karni writes:

In private meetings with more than a dozen members of Congress held on Dec. 5 and 6, Lee briefed lawmakers – all Democrats except for one Republican senator, who Lee declined to identify. Her professional warning to Capitol Hill: “He’s going to unravel, and we are seeing the signs.”

In an interview, she pointed to Trump “going back to conspiracy theories, denying things he has admitted before, his being drawn to violent videos.” Lee also warned, “We feel that the rush of tweeting is an indication of his falling apart under stress. Trump is going to get worse and will become uncontainable with the pressures of the presidency.”

Lee, editor of “The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump,” which includes testimonials from 27 psychiatrists and mental health experts assessing the president’s level of “dangerousness,” said that she was surprised by the interest in her findings during her two days in Washington. “One senator said that it was the meeting he most looked forward to in 11 years,” Lee recalled. “Their level of concern about the president’s dangerousness was surprisingly high.”
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Washington's growing obse...