GOP senator: 'The problem is not owning an AR-15'
Source: The Hill
BY BRETT SAMUELS - 02/18/18 10:57 AM EST
Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) said Sunday he supports improving the background check system for buying a weapon, but said he doesnt think it needs to be harder to buy an AR-15, which was used in a Florida high school shooting last week.
I actually dont think it should be. I think what should be is difficult for any person with any kind of criminal background history, domestic violence, mental instability, all those things, regardless. I dont care whether theyre buying a .22 pistol or an AR-15, Lankford said on Meet The Press.
The problem is not owning an AR-15, its the person that owns it, Lankford added.
Nikolas Cruz, 19, faces 17 counts of premeditated murder after he allegedly opened fire at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Fla., last Wednesday, killing 17 and wounding more than a dozen others. He reportedly used an AR-15 that he was able to purchase legally.
Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/sunday-talk-shows/374446-gop-senator-the-problem-is-not-owning-an-ar-15
Ferrets are Cool
(21,109 posts)duforsure
(11,885 posts)When there was a assault weapon ban it WAS reduced, and the numbers showed it helped. I believe it said it was 37% less with it. That's not better Senator? Sounds like a NRA paid response to me. Republicans are essentially killing our kids , and refuse to stop this from continuing.
Abnredleg
(670 posts)The AWB didn't hamper sales of rifles since the manufacturers just redesigned their weapons to make them legal. The issue is magazine fed semi-automatic rifles, and that's what needs to be dealt with.
and a reinstated AWB should address that, along with bump stocks
truthisfreedom
(23,151 posts)Vote them out.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,806 posts)But even in countries where gun ownership is common, the rate of gun violence is vastly lower. Maybe that's because even gun-owning countries don't let people buy AR-15s.
dlk
(11,574 posts)Of course, if civilians didn't have access to weapons of war, they couldn't commit mass shootings. Take away the weapon, take away the outcome. Since the expiration of the previous assault weapons ban, in 2004, there has been a continuing escalation of mass shootings with assault weapons. In this case, correlation is causation.
B Stieg
(2,410 posts)These weapons have nothing to do with self-defense unless you're under mass invasion, and we have an army to deal with that. AR-15's are "spray and slay" weapons.
You can't own a cruise missile for the same reasons; it's a mass killing device.
And the law is always interested in what motivates an action...
mpcamb
(2,872 posts)Get the mothers and kids to vote his Oklahoman ass out of office.
Wounded Bear
(58,685 posts)I could take that as a start.
Typically, that is ordinary Repub blather. Not to be believed.
Rebl2
(13,539 posts)improving background checks. Who doesnt. Unfortunately background checks dont always work. I seem to remember the Las Vegas shooter passed his background check. The only answer is to ban the sale of military weapons to individuals.
bluestarone
(17,012 posts)They are all singing it in Sync!!! like NRA gave each of them the same message!!!!!!!!!!!!
customerserviceguy
(25,183 posts)It always works for them. Why do anything different if the news a week from now will surely be about something else? The American people have a short attention span, and that's why the "October surprise" is so powerful.
Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,752 posts)black market like every other self-respecting revolutionary on the planet. This idea that the second amendment means they can just go roll down to the local Walmart to get their weapons of mass destruction is just plain ludicrous.
Toorich
(391 posts)can just rule that the Founding Fathers, when discussing the right to keep and bear arms, were obviously referencing
flintlocks. After all, the Court does have the "strict constructionist" republican appointees. So if we only have a right to
possess a flintlock then all other firearms can be totally regulated or banned. Easy peasy.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)God forbid they revisit the 1st, 4th, and other Amendments with a strict constructionist bent.
Even the 13th Amendment only abolishes slavery "except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted." Should we interpret that as it was written?
Voltaire2
(13,109 posts)bobbieinok
(12,858 posts)Ohiogal
(32,036 posts)I have one good senator (Brown) and one complete imbecile (Portman)
bitterross
(4,066 posts)The ammosexual senator is just wrong.
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,031 posts)Ohiogal
(32,036 posts)the Florida kid killer hadn't committed any crimes, so he wasn't in any crime database. At least he'd never been charged with any .... was the domestic violence incident brought to charges or not? Anyone know?
What these complete idiots like Lankford don't realize .... is that any cave dwelling mouth breather who gets riled up by Rush and Pox and their like-minded neighbors or family members or whatever, and who owns a gun, and gets foaming at the mouth enough about something, will go ahead and do something like this heinous massacre. If they didn't have the gun, the one that sprays bullets at a rapid pace, they wouldn't be able to do it. Period.
What good does it do to "report on someone who's acting wacky"? Good God, that's 90% of all Republicans!
turbinetree
(24,710 posts)Just by taking $18,995 dollars in money you have fucking blood on your hands................and just for debate asshole, you passed a law that gave immunity to gun manufactures to sell assault weapons to the public so that they would not beheld accountable--------------your a dick head
November 2018 cannot get here fast enough
forgotmylogin
(7,530 posts)turbinetree
(24,710 posts)Kber
(5,043 posts)KatyaR
(3,445 posts)Tell me, you f***ing piece of shite, what the f*** do you need an AR-15 for? Are you going quail hunting with it?
You worthless shadow of a man, how much money have you taken from the NRA? You aren't worth the shit my dog produces every day....
(Sorry, I'm so fed up with the representation we have from Oklahoma, both local and national, that I want to puke. Thanks to these assholes, they're turning my state into a haven for the rich and a third-world country for everybody else.)
lastlib
(23,266 posts)You don't have a senator, you have Lankford and Inhofe. Corporate right-wing whores.
MGKrebs
(8,138 posts)The NRA needs to be made a pariah.
You can be a gun owner, and a hunter without supporting the horrid catastrophe that the NRA has brought upon this country.
Given the choice, reject any candidate who takes NRA money.
Skittles
(153,174 posts)is YOU REPUKES DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT MENTALLY ILL PEOPLE. You are perfectly happy ALLOWING THEM TO HAVE GUNS while DENYING THEM HEALTH CARE.
randr
(12,413 posts)Assault rifles belong in the hands of well trained and regulated militias, not the general public. Let alone children.
He really has his head up the NRA ass doesn't he?
mwooldri
(10,303 posts)The problem is not owning an AR-15, its the person that owns it."
Great! So gun licenses. Gun registration. Gun insurance. Where are they? There's none of that here in North Carolina, save for the need to get a permit to buy a handgun.
I don't think it should be harder to buy an AR 15 vs a double barreled shotgun. It should be harder to buy ANY gun.
There's also the issue of the ammunition and magazine capacity. In my opinion, high capacity magazines should not be available for civilian use.
lastlib
(23,266 posts)The common thread in nearly all of these mass killings is that "they obtained the weapon(s) legally."
We need to ban the sale and purchase of these industrial-strength killing machines, and do it NOW--before another child dies from one. Run over the god-damned NRA, with an Abrams tank, if necessary. Same with their congressional toadies. I would personally drive one over Wayne LaPeeError's fetid carcass, without batting an eye, to save a kid from another massacre.
BaronChocula
(1,577 posts)Being in possession of meth. Let's legalize it.