Parkland Deputy Told Cops to Stay Away During Shooting
Source: The Daily Beast
A Broward County sheriffs deputy who resigned amid public outrage for failing to enter a Florida high school during a mass shooting last month reportedly told other police officers to stay out of the building as well. According to radio dispatches released Thursday, the deputy, Scott Peterson, reportedly told fellow officers to make sure no one comes inside the school, even as calls flooded into 911 call centers about the chaos inside Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, where 17 people were killed. Despite publicly claiming he believed the gunfire was coming from outside the school, Peterson can be heard in the radio dispatches saying the gunfire was inside the building, the Miami Herald reports. Nonetheless, he told officers to stay at least 500 feet away at this point, a command which a dispatcher then relayed to other police officers. It wasnt until 11 minutes after the shooting began that police officers finally entered the building, a fact that has brought new scrutiny to the Broward County Sheriffs Offices handling of the massacre, which is already under review by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.
READ IT AT THE MIAMI HERALD
###
Read more: https://www.thedailybeast.com/parkland-deputy-told-cops-to-stay-away-during-shooting?ref=home
Ligyron
(7,633 posts)He was a deep state actor who wanted to make the carnage worse in hopes of getting tougher gun legislation passed.
You just watch...
groundloop
(11,519 posts)99 percent of them would be hiding behind a tree and shitting their pants if bullets were flying.
MichMary
(1,714 posts)Look it up. It's a real thing. And it involves LEO going to the sound of gunfire in order to mitigate the death and destruction.
Cruz was allowed 11 minutes to wreak havoc on unarmed students and staff, while the people whose job it was to protect them stood around with their thumbs up their asses waiting til it was over to just write up a report, or something.
MichMary
(1,714 posts)what the police response to an active shooter situation SHOULD be:
http://www.policeforum.org/assets/docs/Critical_Issues_Series/the%20police%20response%20to%20active%20shooter%20incidents%202014.pdf
tactics. Contain and negotiate may be appropriate
for hostage incidents or situations where a person is
barricaded in a room and unable to harm victims.
But it is not appropriate for active shooter incidents.
Columbine resulted in new approaches in which
patrol officers are being trained to respond to active
shooters as quickly as possible.
This is from the article posted in the OP:
The bottom line here is that the guy didn't do his job. Whether he could have saved any lives isn't known, but what is known is that he never even tried.
BumRushDaShow
(129,053 posts)that pretty much said the same as what you indicated. It included a video as illustration. Essentially in active shooter situations, LEO are trained & instructed to "neutralize" (their term) or "take out" (my term) the "threat" (shooter). The video gave various scenarios of how the employees should react/shelter when such a situation was going on based on where they were in relation to the potential shooter(s), including remaining in or sheltering in a room, barricading the door, and staying down under/behind desks other objects to wait for further instructions.
At Columbine, LEO set up a perimeter, as they had been trained to do. What that meant was that Harris and Klebold had more than a half hour to roam the school and murder at will.
Columbine was analyzed six ways to Sunday, and the end result was the protocols that were in place--and ignored--in Parkland.
I really don't understand how Peterson has garnered so much support from people here. He had a job to do, and he didn't do it.
Spouting1horn
(46 posts)I want to see you go in with a 9mm against a fully automatic AR-15.
Merlot
(9,696 posts)MichMary
(1,714 posts)I haven't been trained, and have never even touched a gun. So your whole post is irrelevant.
Why train officers to do anything, if they are just going to flip out and do nothing when they have to do their jobs?
This isn't that hard--Peterson had a job to do, and he didn't do it.
Paladin
(28,262 posts)Pro-gunner vocabulary enforcers, in-coming in 10, 9, 8..........
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)If it's all you have, you go in with a fucking toothbrush, but you still go in.
But that aside (and misidentification of the weapon aside), it's one thing to fail to respond yourself, but quite another to discourage others from acting in response as well.
That is quite the interesting finding. Bit of a record-scratch sound as you read through the various narratives of the response.
irisblue
(32,975 posts)UpInArms
(51,284 posts)The tragedy continues to be worse than we knew ...
B2G
(9,766 posts)It isn't an easy job, which is why not just anyone should have it.
JI7
(89,250 posts)We can't ever be sure until something happens.
inwiththenew
(972 posts)As has been pointed out the book has been written on how to deal with an active shooter since Columbine. This will probably be another case study in law enforcement training. Unfortunately it seems like these lessons need to be written in blood.
Nash Teeth
(57 posts)The dept was responsible for providing training related to the active shooter protocol.
MichMary
(1,714 posts)there had been training. I wonder how much training there was.
AzureCrest
(65 posts)1 - Training as you have stated
2 - Personnel decision - who decided to assign this deputy at the school
3 - Leadership - who was making decisions regarding whether to enter the building; and when.