Pennsylvania Wants Voter ID Supreme Court Hearing Delayed
Source: Talkingpointsmemo
Pa. Wants Voter ID Supreme Court Hearing Delayed
RYAN J. REILLY 4:55 PM EDT, TUESDAY AUGUST 21, 2012
The state of Pennsylvania doesn't think it is necessary for Pennsylvania's Supreme Court to rush into a hearing on the state's controversial voter ID law next month, writing in a filing on Tuesday that the hearing can wait until just a few weeks before the election.
Pennsylvania wrote in the court filing that scheduling arguments for the October 2012 term in Pittsburgh "is more realistic than attempting to schedule it for the September term in Philadelphia, which is less than three weeks away and which has alread been extended to include a full day of argument regarding the redistricting cases." The state suggested that the hearings be scheduled for the week of Oct. 15, just three weeks before the election.
ACLUPA's Vic Walczak told TPM that the state knows that October would be too late for anything to change before Election Day.
"Mid-October is too late and I'm sure the state realizes that. They would justifiably come in and say 'regardless of what you do, court, it's too late to change anything now'." Walczak said. "The closer you get to Election Day, the harder it is to make any changes."
Read more: http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/pa-wants-voter-id-supreme-court-hearing-delayed
secondwind
(16,903 posts)flpoljunkie
(26,184 posts)april
(1,148 posts)nobodyspecial
(2,286 posts)How else will they be able to steal the next election?
freshwest
(53,661 posts)harun
(11,348 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,121 posts)Time to pull out the Sandusky cover-up issue on Corbett.
mrmpa
(4,033 posts)I am tired of waiting on the sideline for the press to bring this issue to light. I can't stand my state any more. I also blame the Democratic Party for the dildo they ran for Governor. It should have been Jack Wagner.
Smilo
(1,944 posts)tricks to deny voters their rights.
And just think what will happen if they actually came back into power - probably only the 1% would be allowed to vote.
malthaussen
(17,204 posts)I hope the Supremes are so pissed off at all the extra work that they rule for the people in both cases.
-- Mal
SunSeeker
(51,574 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,191 posts)Lock them up and throw away the key!