Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 07:49 PM Aug 2012

UPDATE: Japan Considers Zero-Nuclear Energy Policy

Source: Dow Jones Newswires

The Japanese government is likely to decide to eliminate all nuclear power over the next two decades in a new long-term energy plan--a decision that comes amid strong public opposition to atomic energy and ahead of national elections expected in the next few months.

Following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant accident in March 2011, Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda set up a council to recommend a long-term energy strategy based around three scenarios: phasing out nuclear power completely by 2030, reducing dependence to 15%, or keeping it at current levels of around 20%- 25%. All the scenarios aim to increase the use of renewable energy to at least 20% from the current 10%.

The government is expected to announce a final decision in September.

While it had been widely expected to choose the middle option, government officials said Tuesday that the council is now most likely to select the zero- nuclear option.

<snip>

Read more: http://tinyurl.com/9m6hbhn



Note: I had to use a URL shortener, the original link isn't pasting properly.

The article is also at the Wall Street Journal but behind a paywall: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443855804577603051383403854.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
UPDATE: Japan Considers Zero-Nuclear Energy Policy (Original Post) bananas Aug 2012 OP
Lets hope the public memory is longer than the politicians' in 20 years. dixiegrrrrl Aug 2012 #1
The WSJ link works fine. RC Aug 2012 #2
Uhhhhh....DUH! SoapBox Aug 2012 #3
Good for them. Let's hope they follow through on it. Zoeisright Aug 2012 #4
The Japanese people have been heard RobertEarl Aug 2012 #5
iiyo!! (good!) AsahinaKimi Aug 2012 #6
Did you know that these plants were designed and built by GE? Blanks Aug 2012 #7
I have two words: Hydra Aug 2012 #8
The Japanese may go that route, but I hope the US doesn't. David__77 Aug 2012 #9
Note that no-one has offered to turn off all their electrical lights and appliances.... PavePusher Aug 2012 #10
I'm all for efficiency. David__77 Aug 2012 #11

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
1. Lets hope the public memory is longer than the politicians' in 20 years.
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 07:58 PM
Aug 2012

That should be around the time they figure out how to cover Fukishima.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
5. The Japanese people have been heard
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 08:57 PM
Aug 2012

Recent street demonstrations consisting of close to 100,000 Japanese protesting nuclear power were simply amazing in a country that is used to being told what the future holds by its government.

The government is responding to its people.

I wish the US government was as responsive as the Japanese.

Blanks

(4,835 posts)
7. Did you know that these plants were designed and built by GE?
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 09:30 PM
Aug 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/16/world/asia/16contain.html

Oddly that doesn't seem to be common knowledge. I hadn't heard it before anyway.

Hydra

(14,459 posts)
8. I have two words:
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 09:56 PM
Aug 2012

ABOUT TIME.

I hope they actually do this- it's time to leave all of the dirty energy(and profits from such) in the dustbin of history.

David__77

(23,423 posts)
9. The Japanese may go that route, but I hope the US doesn't.
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 10:03 PM
Aug 2012

The US needs more, not less nuclear power. Nuclear plants should be owner and operated by the federal government, under strict safety protocols. But nuclear power is absolutely critical for long-term economic growth.

 

PavePusher

(15,374 posts)
10. Note that no-one has offered to turn off all their electrical lights and appliances....
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 10:59 PM
Aug 2012

and go back to oil lamps, candles and wood-burning stoves.

They never do.

(For the record, I grew up with wood heat and cookstove and, frequently, no electricity or hot water. I'm not volunteering to go back to that.)

David__77

(23,423 posts)
11. I'm all for efficiency.
Tue Aug 21, 2012, 11:42 PM
Aug 2012

I know there are many cost effective energy efficiency measures, and I firmly believe the state should subsidize these as a public good. But the fact is that, over the long run, energy intensiveness is a measure of economic development and human progress. I'm old fashioned with these Enlightenment views, but I firmly believe them to be true.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UPDATE: Japan Considers Z...