Trump administration, seeking to speed deportations, to impose quotas on immigration judges
Source: The Washington Post
By Nick Miroff April 2 at 6:24 PM
The Trump administration will pressure U.S. immigration judges to process cases faster by establishing a quota system tied to their annual performance reviews, according to new Justice Department directives.
The judges will be expected to clear at least 700 cases a year to receive a satisfactory performance rating, a standard that their union called an unprecedented step that risks undermining judicial independence. Attorney General Jeff Sessions has promised to stiffen immigration enforcement partly by moving more aggressively to clear a backlog of more than 600,000 cases pending before the Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR).
Some immigrants facing deportation wait years for a court date, and are typically authorized to work in the United States to support themselves during that time, an arrangement critics view as an incentive to illegal immigration.
According to a copy of the guidelines, first reported by The Wall Street Journal, the purpose of the new quota system will be to ensure cases are completed in a timely, efficient, and effective manner.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-administration-seeking-to-speed-deportations-to-impose-quotas-on-immigration-judges/2018/04/02/a282d650-36bb-11e8-b57c-9445cc4dfa5e_story.html?utm_term=.27005b77ba0f
sinkingfeeling
(51,460 posts)machoneman
(4,007 posts)The SC will be tasked eventually to comment and it will be a resounding NO!
Girard442
(6,075 posts)That's what Trump really wants.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Isn't much difference.
The people are swept up, placed in for profit detention centers, which Sessions is invested in, and various other contractors make money off them as they are sent out of the country.
reports of many legal citizens getting caught up in the raids.
Skittles
(153,169 posts)these are PEOPLE
paleotn
(17,931 posts)Shit Gibbon hasn't quite figured out that the Judiciary doesn't report to him.
yurbud
(39,405 posts)Are those judges appointed for life?
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,489 posts)If they do, a bad performance review doesn't count for much.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,489 posts)Hat tip, commenter "clay" at Joe.My.God: http://www.joemygod.com/2018/04/03/doj-sets-deportation-quotas-immigration-judges/
This seems blatantly unconstitutional. Our justice system is not a corporation.
Due process as long as quotas are met.
22
ReplyShare
−
Avatar
EXCEPT: Immigration Court Justices are not in the judicial branch, but locked in the executive branch. Jeffy Secessions really is their boss, already.
BTW: The justices are being juggled around, place to place, which is one of the reasons they've been unable to decrease the backlog. That's a management decision that's (also) Jeffy's fault.
It would still seem that immigrants are being denied due process since the judges decision is based upon their own quota rather than a fair hearing.
5
ReplyShare
−
Avatar
Yes, but there's nearly no due process in the imigration court process to begin with.
They_Live
(3,236 posts)Shoulda done some of that there book learnin'. Ya see, there's separate branches...
NCjack
(10,279 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,096 posts)that is part of the Executive Branch vs the Judicial Branch but also indicates cautions -
Judge A. Ashley Tabaddor, president of the National Association of Immigration Judges, said the quota system could introduce an appealable issue and invite legal challenges.
It could call into question the integrity and impartiality of the court if a judges decision is influenced by factors outside the facts of the case, or if motions are denied out of a judges concern about keeping his or her job, Tabaddor said.
We dont know of any other court whose judges are subject to individual quotas and deadlines as part of performance reviews and evaluations, she said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-administration-seeking-to-speed-deportations-to-impose-quotas-on-immigration-judges/2018/04/02/a282d650-36bb-11e8-b57c-9445cc4dfa5e_story.html?utm_term=.3bf40c45a71b
Meaning that whatever this Immigration Review group comes up with as a final adjudications for their cases, that could be challenged and possibly be thrown out by the federal courts if there impartiality is found.