Federal judge upholds Massachusetts assault weapons ban
Source: The Hill
BY MORGAN GSTALTER - 04/06/18 11:46 AM EDT
A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit on Friday challenging Massachusetts ban on assault weapons.
U.S. District Judge William Young said in his ruling that the firearms and large magazines banned by the state in 1998 are not within the scope of the personal right to bear Arms under the Second Amendment.
The features of a military style rifle are "designed and intended to by particularly suitable for combat rather than sporting applications," Young wrote. Massachusetts was within its rights since the ban passed directly through elected representatives, Young decided.
Other states are equally free to leave them unregulated and available to their law-abiding citizens, Young wrote. These policy matters are simply not of constitutional moment. Americans are not afraid of bumptious, raucous, and robust debate about these matters. We call it democracy.
Read more: http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/381957-federal-judge-upholds-massachusetts-assault-weapons-ban
billh58
(6,635 posts)Gothmog
(145,242 posts)hlthe2b
(102,276 posts)Gawd, some of the subject lines this morning have been awful.
notdarkyet
(2,226 posts)Brainstormy
(2,380 posts)is our most important product.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)HopeAgain
(4,407 posts)they would rather talk about how it can't be done like it has been done in MA.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,014 posts)NickB79
(19,243 posts)Judi Lynn
(160,530 posts)Alanna Durkin Richer, Associated Press
Updated 8:41 pm, Friday, April 6, 2018
BOSTON (AP) Assault weapons and large-capacity magazines are not protected by the Second Amendment, a federal judge said in a ruling Friday upholding Massachusetts' ban on the weapons.
U.S. District Judge William Young dismissed a lawsuit challenging the 20-year-old ban, saying assault weapons are military firearms that fall beyond the reach of the constitutional right to "bear arms."
Regulation of the weapons is a matter of policy, not for the courts, he said.
"Other states are equally free to leave them unregulated and available to their law-abiding citizens," Young said. "These policy matters are simply not of constitutional moment. Americans are not afraid of bumptious, raucous and robust debate about these matters. We call it democracy."
More:
https://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Federal-judge-upholds-Massachusetts-assault-12812100.php