Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Apr 6, 2018, 12:03 PM Apr 2018

Federal judge upholds Massachusetts assault weapons ban

Source: The Hill



BY MORGAN GSTALTER - 04/06/18 11:46 AM EDT

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit on Friday challenging Massachusett’s ban on assault weapons.

U.S. District Judge William Young said in his ruling that the firearms and large magazines banned by the state in 1998 are “not within the scope of the personal right to ‘bear Arms’ under the Second Amendment.”

The features of a military style rifle are "designed and intended to by particularly suitable for combat rather than sporting applications," Young wrote. Massachusetts was within its rights since the ban passed directly through elected representatives, Young decided.

“Other states are equally free to leave them unregulated and available to their law-abiding citizens,” Young wrote. “These policy matters are simply not of constitutional moment. Americans are not afraid of bumptious, raucous, and robust debate about these matters. We call it democracy.”


Read more: http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/381957-federal-judge-upholds-massachusetts-assault-weapons-ban

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge upholds Massachusetts assault weapons ban (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2018 OP
K & R! n/t billh58 Apr 2018 #1
The Heller opinion allows for these restrictions Gothmog Apr 2018 #2
Finally, one bit of good news today. hlthe2b Apr 2018 #3
Massachusetts leading the way. notdarkyet Apr 2018 #4
Progress, as General Electric used to say, Brainstormy Apr 2018 #5
Oh, those states rights..keep getting in the way....good on my home state of Mass....eom asiliveandbreathe Apr 2018 #6
And...that's another reason Massachusetts has the lowest gun deaths in the U.S. FailureToCommunicate Apr 2018 #7
Please don't try to confuse gunsplainers with statistics HopeAgain Apr 2018 #8
Doh! What was I thinking. FailureToCommunicate Apr 2018 #9
Quick question: does this only apply to semi-automatic firearms? NickB79 Apr 2018 #10
Judge: Assault weapons ban doesn't violate 2nd Amendment Judi Lynn Apr 2018 #11

HopeAgain

(4,407 posts)
8. Please don't try to confuse gunsplainers with statistics
Fri Apr 6, 2018, 02:34 PM
Apr 2018

they would rather talk about how it can't be done like it has been done in MA.

Judi Lynn

(160,530 posts)
11. Judge: Assault weapons ban doesn't violate 2nd Amendment
Fri Apr 6, 2018, 11:15 PM
Apr 2018

Alanna Durkin Richer, Associated Press
 Updated 8:41 pm, Friday, April 6, 2018

BOSTON (AP) — Assault weapons and large-capacity magazines are not protected by the Second Amendment, a federal judge said in a ruling Friday upholding Massachusetts' ban on the weapons.

U.S. District Judge William Young dismissed a lawsuit challenging the 20-year-old ban, saying assault weapons are military firearms that fall beyond the reach of the constitutional right to "bear arms."

Regulation of the weapons is a matter of policy, not for the courts, he said.

"Other states are equally free to leave them unregulated and available to their law-abiding citizens," Young said. "These policy matters are simply not of constitutional moment. Americans are not afraid of bumptious, raucous and robust debate about these matters. We call it democracy."

More:
https://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Federal-judge-upholds-Massachusetts-assault-12812100.php

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal judge upholds Mas...