Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,025 posts)
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 08:31 PM Aug 2012

CREW Challenges Fox D.C. Licenses (petitioning FCC to revoke NewsCorp broadcast licenses)

Source: Broadcasting & Cable

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) has petitioned the FCC to deny renewal of three Washington-area Fox-owned TV stations. The group had signaled the move last spring in the wake of the News of the World phone hacking scandal in Britain.

The stations are WTTG-TV, WDCA-TV, both Washington, and WUTB Baltimore.

CREW last spring asked the FCC to yank all Fox licenses, alleging that News Corp.'s Rupert and James Murdoch don't have the character qualifications to hold station licenses. The FCC has taken no action to date, the group pointed out, which prompted them to open the second front with the F.C. challenge to the station renewal.

Read more: http://broadcastingcable.com/article/488758-CREW_Challenges_Fox_D_C_Licenses.php

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

LiberalFighter

(50,929 posts)
7. Who becomes owner of the company if Murdoch is gone?
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 09:05 PM
Aug 2012

Didn't Murdoch become a citizen in order to own tv stations in the USA?

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
8. Fox is nothing but an propaganda outlet
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 09:36 PM
Aug 2012

masquerading as a news outlet.

Free Speech does not apply to liars and thieves.

Murdoch might as well give up his US Citizenship once his FCC licenses are revoked, permanently.

The Wielding Truth

(11,415 posts)
9. This would be one of the best things to do to revive the health of national news!
Wed Aug 22, 2012, 11:54 PM
Aug 2012

I'm for this action. It is long overdo. Murdoch has mislead the masses who have these lies available to them thinking that it is new when it is destructive propaganda. Monopolies are bad for free and open societies.Murdoch has too much power.

onenote

(42,703 posts)
10. Even if the FCC pulled Fox's broadcast licenses in DC, it wouldn't impact Fox News
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 12:16 AM
Aug 2012

And I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for them to pull any of Fox's broadcast licenses. The leading precedent in this area is the RKO General case -- that case took over two decades and the principal basis for the FCC ruling that RKO should lose its licenses was not various deceptive practices and other misconduct by its corporate parent, but its lying about those and other matters to the FCC.

pbrower2a

(132 posts)
12. RKO is relevant
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 08:09 AM
Aug 2012

General Tire was the problem; RKO wasn't.

The oxymoronic News Corporation (it should be Newspeak Corporation) has had some horrible scandals in the UK, and those reflect on the Murdoch media empire overall. In view of the requirement that ownership be of good character even if the station operates without objectionable characteristics, the General Tire/RKO case is valid.

Television is effectively an oligopoly in most markets. One of the assumed responsibilities of TV broadcasting is to inform people... and to NOT allow stations to become propaganda machines. News Corporation has largely stripped local stations of their individuality and has micromanaged the content of political news to coordinate with the content of FoX Newspeak Channel.

onenote

(42,703 posts)
16. What got RKO in the most trouble was that it lied to the FCC about Gen Tire's behavior
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 02:46 PM
Aug 2012

That "lack of candor" with the FCC is what led to the first licenses being pulled.

And, again, none of this has any relevance for Fox News, which isn't licensed by the FCC.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
11. Pulling the broadcast licenses of three local stations would have no effect on Fox cable
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 03:53 AM
Aug 2012

Or on Fox broadcast licenses everywhere else.

pbrower2a

(132 posts)
13. Another one: Lamar Broadcasting in the 1960s
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 08:23 AM
Aug 2012

Lamar Broadcasting (WLBT, Jackson, Mississippi) was one of two TV stations in mid-Mississippi in the early 1960s. Its ownership was not subtle in its racism.


from Wikipedia:

[quote]The station (WLBT, NBC-3, Jackson, Mississippi)attained notoriety for its aggressive support of racial segregation in Mississippi in the 1950s and 1960s. Lamar had close ties to the state's white political and business elite and with segregationist groups, such as the White Citizens' Council. It went as far as to coordinate opposition to civil rights with these groups. For instance, the station allowed the WCC to operate a bookstore in the lobby of its studios in downtown Jackson. and the station manager editorialized on the air against the admission of James Meredith to the University of Mississippi in 1962, arguing that states should determine who should and should not be allowed to attend their schools.

For the most part, the station ignored the Civil Rights movement, cutting out coverage of it from the NBC News feed (largely by pretending that technical problems were the cause of interruptions). It also pre-empted NBC programs that even mildly referred to racial justice or featured African American actors prominently. At the same time, it provided a platform on its local newscasts and public affairs programs for individuals advocating resistance to efforts by the federal government to enable African Americans to vote and gain access to basic amenities such as non-segregated public schools.

Many television stations in the South felt chagrin at network coverage of the Civil Rights movement, especially WBRC-TV in Birmingham, Alabama and WRAL-TV in Raleigh, North Carolina. Although some Southern stations severed their ties with their networks in order to prevent being forced to air coverage of the movement, Channel 3 kept its affiliation with NBC, even though that network historically had an extremely low tolerance towards local pre-emptions at the time. Indeed, many NBC stars, like Bonanza's Pernell Roberts, were speaking out on behalf of civil rights. This was largely because WLBT's only competition was CBS affiliate WJTV, a situation that lasted until 1970, when the market picked up a full-time ABC affiliate in WAPT.

Over the years, NBC, civil rights groups and the United Church of Christ (represented locally by the Woodworth Chapel at nearby Tougaloo College) sent numerous petitions to the Federal Communications Commission to complain of WLBT's flagrant bias. The FCC issued several warnings to Lamar, but these went unheeded. The issue was contested in court, with the United States courts of appeals, in an opinion written by Warren Burger, forcing the FCC to revoke the station's license in 1969. Lamar appealed, but lost in 1971. That June, control of the station was given to a bi-racial, non-profit foundation called "Communications Improvement, Inc." The group promised to make the station a beacon of tolerance. While most WLBT employees were retained, a new group of managers, including some of the first African American television executives in the South, recreated the station as a far more neutral news source.

To this day, WLBT remains one of only two television stations that has ever lost its license for violating FCC regulations on fairness. The other station, WJIM-TV (now WLNS-TV) in Lansing, Michigan, had its license reinstated on appeal. [/quote]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WLBT

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,457 posts)
14. "The stations are WTTG-TV, WDCA-TV, both Washington, and WUTB Baltimore."
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 09:08 AM
Aug 2012

WTTG is channel 5, WDCA is channel 20, and WUTB is channel 45.

Please note that, even though these are Fox-owned stations, they are not part of Fox News. I watch them all the time. I never see any of those people who show up on Fox News. Fox News is a separate operation.

I happen to like channel 5. It used to be the DuMont station in Washington. Back in the 60s, it would show Mothra in prime time. How can I turn my back on someone who did that?

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
15. FREEDOM DEAMNDS IT!
Thu Aug 23, 2012, 01:35 PM
Aug 2012

We need a dedicated government bureaucracy to monitor all broadcasts for truthiness! We can't have True Democracy if we let a bunch of commoners run around making their own decisions! What kind of liberty would that be? All right-thinking people understand that only government can guarantee the sort of government we all deserve. And anyone who says differently? We all know what kind of people *they* are.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CREW Challenges Fox D.C. ...