CREW Challenges Fox D.C. Licenses (petitioning FCC to revoke NewsCorp broadcast licenses)
Source: Broadcasting & Cable
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) has petitioned the FCC to deny renewal of three Washington-area Fox-owned TV stations. The group had signaled the move last spring in the wake of the News of the World phone hacking scandal in Britain.
The stations are WTTG-TV, WDCA-TV, both Washington, and WUTB Baltimore.
CREW last spring asked the FCC to yank all Fox licenses, alleging that News Corp.'s Rupert and James Murdoch don't have the character qualifications to hold station licenses. The FCC has taken no action to date, the group pointed out, which prompted them to open the second front with the F.C. challenge to the station renewal.
Read more: http://broadcastingcable.com/article/488758-CREW_Challenges_Fox_D_C_Licenses.php
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)And on top of that, these people are all illegal aliens!!!!
- K&R
freshwest
(53,661 posts)kestrel91316
(51,666 posts)This will go nowhere.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)skydive forever
(445 posts)never gonna happen. Wish it would, but no way.
LiberalFighter
(50,929 posts)Didn't Murdoch become a citizen in order to own tv stations in the USA?
Panasonic
(2,921 posts)masquerading as a news outlet.
Free Speech does not apply to liars and thieves.
Murdoch might as well give up his US Citizenship once his FCC licenses are revoked, permanently.
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)I'm for this action. It is long overdo. Murdoch has mislead the masses who have these lies available to them thinking that it is new when it is destructive propaganda. Monopolies are bad for free and open societies.Murdoch has too much power.
onenote
(42,703 posts)And I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for them to pull any of Fox's broadcast licenses. The leading precedent in this area is the RKO General case -- that case took over two decades and the principal basis for the FCC ruling that RKO should lose its licenses was not various deceptive practices and other misconduct by its corporate parent, but its lying about those and other matters to the FCC.
pbrower2a
(132 posts)General Tire was the problem; RKO wasn't.
The oxymoronic News Corporation (it should be Newspeak Corporation) has had some horrible scandals in the UK, and those reflect on the Murdoch media empire overall. In view of the requirement that ownership be of good character even if the station operates without objectionable characteristics, the General Tire/RKO case is valid.
Television is effectively an oligopoly in most markets. One of the assumed responsibilities of TV broadcasting is to inform people... and to NOT allow stations to become propaganda machines. News Corporation has largely stripped local stations of their individuality and has micromanaged the content of political news to coordinate with the content of FoX Newspeak Channel.
onenote
(42,703 posts)That "lack of candor" with the FCC is what led to the first licenses being pulled.
And, again, none of this has any relevance for Fox News, which isn't licensed by the FCC.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Or on Fox broadcast licenses everywhere else.
pbrower2a
(132 posts)Lamar Broadcasting (WLBT, Jackson, Mississippi) was one of two TV stations in mid-Mississippi in the early 1960s. Its ownership was not subtle in its racism.
from Wikipedia:
[quote]The station (WLBT, NBC-3, Jackson, Mississippi)attained notoriety for its aggressive support of racial segregation in Mississippi in the 1950s and 1960s. Lamar had close ties to the state's white political and business elite and with segregationist groups, such as the White Citizens' Council. It went as far as to coordinate opposition to civil rights with these groups. For instance, the station allowed the WCC to operate a bookstore in the lobby of its studios in downtown Jackson. and the station manager editorialized on the air against the admission of James Meredith to the University of Mississippi in 1962, arguing that states should determine who should and should not be allowed to attend their schools.
For the most part, the station ignored the Civil Rights movement, cutting out coverage of it from the NBC News feed (largely by pretending that technical problems were the cause of interruptions). It also pre-empted NBC programs that even mildly referred to racial justice or featured African American actors prominently. At the same time, it provided a platform on its local newscasts and public affairs programs for individuals advocating resistance to efforts by the federal government to enable African Americans to vote and gain access to basic amenities such as non-segregated public schools.
Many television stations in the South felt chagrin at network coverage of the Civil Rights movement, especially WBRC-TV in Birmingham, Alabama and WRAL-TV in Raleigh, North Carolina. Although some Southern stations severed their ties with their networks in order to prevent being forced to air coverage of the movement, Channel 3 kept its affiliation with NBC, even though that network historically had an extremely low tolerance towards local pre-emptions at the time. Indeed, many NBC stars, like Bonanza's Pernell Roberts, were speaking out on behalf of civil rights. This was largely because WLBT's only competition was CBS affiliate WJTV, a situation that lasted until 1970, when the market picked up a full-time ABC affiliate in WAPT.
Over the years, NBC, civil rights groups and the United Church of Christ (represented locally by the Woodworth Chapel at nearby Tougaloo College) sent numerous petitions to the Federal Communications Commission to complain of WLBT's flagrant bias. The FCC issued several warnings to Lamar, but these went unheeded. The issue was contested in court, with the United States courts of appeals, in an opinion written by Warren Burger, forcing the FCC to revoke the station's license in 1969. Lamar appealed, but lost in 1971. That June, control of the station was given to a bi-racial, non-profit foundation called "Communications Improvement, Inc." The group promised to make the station a beacon of tolerance. While most WLBT employees were retained, a new group of managers, including some of the first African American television executives in the South, recreated the station as a far more neutral news source.
To this day, WLBT remains one of only two television stations that has ever lost its license for violating FCC regulations on fairness. The other station, WJIM-TV (now WLNS-TV) in Lansing, Michigan, had its license reinstated on appeal. [/quote]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WLBT
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,457 posts)WTTG is channel 5, WDCA is channel 20, and WUTB is channel 45.
Please note that, even though these are Fox-owned stations, they are not part of Fox News. I watch them all the time. I never see any of those people who show up on Fox News. Fox News is a separate operation.
I happen to like channel 5. It used to be the DuMont station in Washington. Back in the 60s, it would show Mothra in prime time. How can I turn my back on someone who did that?
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)We need a dedicated government bureaucracy to monitor all broadcasts for truthiness! We can't have True Democracy if we let a bunch of commoners run around making their own decisions! What kind of liberty would that be? All right-thinking people understand that only government can guarantee the sort of government we all deserve. And anyone who says differently? We all know what kind of people *they* are.