60% in City Oppose Soda Ban, Calling It An Overreach by Bloomberg, a Poll Finds
Source: The New York Times
Three weeks before a scheduled Board of Health vote on the proposal, New Yorkers are cool to Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg's plan to prohibit sales of large sugary drinks in city restaurants, stadiums and movie theaters, according to a new poll by The New York Times.
Six in 10 residents said the mayor's soda plan was a bad idea, compared with 36 percent who called it a good idea. A majority in every borough was opposed; Bronx and Queens residents were more likely than Manhattanites to say the plan was a bad idea.
Read more: http://mobile.nytimes.com/2012/08/23/nyregion/most-new-yorkers-oppose-bloombergs-soda-ban.xml
There are better ways to fight obesity and combat HFCS than over reaching into adults' dietary choices.
(edit) I would support taxing soda though, and the only argument the sugar water industry would have is this notoriously bad "Americans Against Food Taxes" ad:
DuaneBidoux
(4,198 posts)Definite overreach.
Now banning soda from schools--that's a different chestnut.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)I agree with the ban although better still; I think all soda should be a controlled substance
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Why give them new rationales?
Selatius
(20,441 posts)Tax it like they're cigarettes.
RevStPatrick
(2,208 posts)100% tax on all sodas over 20 ounces.
Or something like that.
I don't really care.
I drink one Mexican Coke a month, and maybe one Jones or Fenniman's a month.
I think it's pretty much a non-issue for most people.
David__77
(23,418 posts)What the hell else was I supposed to buy with my two dollar a day budget?!?
part man all 86
(367 posts)I do not need a daddy day care mentality tax to show me the way to healthy living. Why stop there, how about a motor tax on any electric, diesel, gas, or fuel burning engine from a lawn mower to a huge cargo ship at 100% or a tax on potty mouth at $100 a pop or if you wear too much perfume or cologne that will be $10 odor draft. Or if you tell any lie it will be 10 days in the pokey, do not pass go or collect $200 or forgot to take a bath a day, be force to swim in a suds pool for 24 hours. Or better yet, it is our life and stay out of it unless you want to start something that can and will snowball into a clusterfuck. I, the evil one have typed!
*But I do agree sweets and sodas in schools should be limited.
SylviaD
(721 posts)bhikkhu
(10,718 posts)...for the poor and middle class to know that they are giving their kids obesity, hypoglycemia and diabetes when they supply them regularly with cheap soda. In any case, it has nothing to do with income, same as cigarettes - disease disables and kills with an egalitarian lack of concern for wealth and status.
http://rense.com/general69/fruc.htm
http://www.thekitchn.com/princeton-proves-high-fructose-112003
http://drmericle.com/hypoglycemia.php
...and so forth. There's plenty of documentation, although (like with global warming) there is plenty of money behind any narrative that changes the subject and changes nothing.
erpowers
(9,350 posts)The Mayor's plan was bad policy. The ban did not extend to grocery stores, or convenience stores, which it seems most people get most of the sodas. As a result the ban was bad policy in that very few people, if any, we're prevented from getting large sodas.
bhikkhu
(10,718 posts)then its worth it. The studies linking high fructose corn syrup to diabetes are enough for me, though the correlation in the rise of diabetes and the use of the sweetener should have been sufficient. I wish we had more substitutes on the market - cane sugar sweetened sodas taste wonderful, but why are they so hard to find?
Javaman
(62,530 posts)I love humans, the ridiculous things really matter to them.