Swiss drug maker Novartis was questioned over ties to Trump attorney
Source: USA Today
John Fritze, USA TODAY Published 9:14 a.m. ET May 9, 2018
WASHINGTON A Swiss pharmaceutical giant that paid President Trumps personal attorney hundreds of thousands of dollars was questioned by special counsel Robert Mueller late last year, the company acknowledged Wednesday.
A subsidiary of Novartis which makes Ritalin, Lamisil and other well-known drugs paid Trump attorney Michael Cohen nearly $400,000 from late 2017 to early 2018 as part of a one-year agreement company officials said expired in February. The company described Cohens work as focused on US healthcare policy matters.
Days after the final payment was made to a company Cohen created called Essential Consultants, Trump met with European business leaders for dinner in Switzerland, including Vasant Narasimhan, the CEO of Novartis International. The meeting, which took place at the World Economic Forum in Davos, was billed as an opportunity for the president to pitch overseas firms on investing in the United States.
The dinner also included Werner Baumann, CEO of Bayer, which is based in Germany, and Mark Schneider, the CEO of Switzerland-based Nestle. There is no evidence Cohen helped to set up that meeting. A Novartis statement said the company hired Cohens firm before Narasimhan became CEO in September.
Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/05/09/novartis-questioned-mueller-ties-trump-attorney-michael-cohen/593732002/
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)Is it uncovering a slush fund and how it's done? How many republicans have taken bribes besides trump? Nunes?....Ryan????....Starting to make more sense now. How many other slush funds going? Is that how the NRA got all the money for 2016 election cycle?
BumRushDaShow
(129,258 posts)That will be something for media to look into (Mueller probably already knows).
beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)Others....
The media is not doing their job as we expect.
BumRushDaShow
(129,258 posts)they can hop right to it (I'm sure some have but it may take awhile considering how convoluted the stuff is)!
Cognitive_Resonance
(1,546 posts)makers. "Funnel it through a law firm" so the cloak of attorney-client privilege would add a near bulletproof layer of protection from discovery.
Freethinker65
(10,029 posts)C_U_L8R
(45,013 posts)the swamp is full of slush.
Stinky Trump slush.
groundloop
(11,520 posts)Spanky obviously put the word out that he could be bought, and it was certainly a nice touch to funnel the bribes through an "attorney". I suspect Mueller won't have any trouble convincing a judge what the truth is.
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
marble falls This message was self-deleted by its author.