MSNBC gives 'verbal warning' to host Hugh Hewitt over Pruitt meeting
Source: cnn
MSNBC has admonished weekend host Hugh Hewitt for lobbying EPA head Scott Pruitt to clean up a polluted site near Hewitt's home in California.
In a statement released Wednesday, a spokesperson for MSNBC said that Hewitt "was given a verbal warning as such activity is a violation of our standards."
The revelation of a request for a meeting between Pruitt and Hewitt's law firm came earlier this week after a cache of internal emails was released as a result of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit by the environmental group The Sierra Club.
In one of the correspondences from September, first reported by Politico, the MSNBC host asked Pruitt for a meeting with lawyers from Hewitt's firm who represent a water district that sought federal help to clean up a toxic waste site in Orange County, California, where Hewitt lives.
Read more: http://money.cnn.com/2018/05/09/media/hugh-hewitt-msnbc-verbal-warning-scott-pruitt/index.html
George II
(67,782 posts)pbmus
(12,422 posts)He fits with maga....which is a fallacy built on lies and hypocrisy...
sandensea
(21,643 posts)Pathetic.
catbyte
(34,413 posts)mouth starts yapping lies.
samplegirl
(11,488 posts)Everyone should email MSNBC!
Gothmog
(145,415 posts)RockRaven
(14,978 posts)Really what people look for in a crowded media landscape.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)That grinning idiot adds nothing to the larger journalistic conversation.
SharonAnn
(13,777 posts)Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)WhiteTara
(29,719 posts)the feds know you are a lobbyist?
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Its a little different when you are getting paid to do it so there are different rules.
WhiteTara
(29,719 posts)isn't that illegal?
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)It was completely a self-serving endeavor. In doing so he places no jeopardy upon himself as far as the government is concerned anymore than you would if you lobbied your own representatives. The problem he has is his employer has rules about such things because he is using his position to influence politics which attacks the credibility of the news organization.
WhiteTara
(29,719 posts)never answer a post before the first sip of coffee. I was thinking of the wrong person and then realized the discussion was about that ass hugh hewitt. Thanks for the answer and the polite explanation!
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)WhiteTara
(29,719 posts)it was all I had all day. I'm having a cup of tea and sitting down for the first time today. Aah.
BootinUp
(47,168 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)ToxMarz
(2,169 posts)lillypaddle
(9,581 posts)know our disgust with this RWNJ, how will they get the word? I probably send them tweets at least once a week, but I don't know if anyone else is contacting them. Same with them having Scaramucci on.
We need to start making our voices heard in places other than DU, IMHO.
louis c
(8,652 posts)I have complained to MSNBC about Hewitt. Why does this right wing piece of shit have air time at this station?
I have been watching more and more of CNN. It's bad enough if I have to tolerate the right wing talking points from invited guests, but to host his own show is a bad idea.
If I want to hear the other opinion, I'll watch FOX (which I do, on occasion, to see what the other side is saying), but to listen to a host spray that bullshit on MSNBC is intolerable.