Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 08:08 AM Jun 2018

Trump: Why hasn't Samantha Bee been fired over crude Ivanka remark?

Source: Politico




By LOUIS NELSON 06/01/2018 07:57 AM EDT

President Donald Trump lashed out at TBS host Samantha Bee on Friday morning, asking his Twitter followers why the comedian had not been fired over a vulgar insult she directed at Ivanka Trump and suggesting Bee is being held to a different standard than Roseanne Barr, the pro-Trump comedian whose ABC sitcom was canceled over a racist remark she made online.

“Why aren’t they firing no talent Samantha Bee for the horrible language used on her low ratings show?” the president wrote on Twitter. “A total double standard but that’s O.K., we are Winning, and will be doing so for a long time to come!”

Bee attacked Ivanka Trump on Wednesday night on her TBS show “Full Frontal,” where she urged the president’s daughter to “do something about your dad’s immigration practices, you feckless c---!”

“He listens to you,” she continued. “Put on something tight and low-cut and tell your father to f---ing stop it. Tell him it was an Obama thing and see how it goes, OK?”

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/01/trump-samantha-bee-ivanka-tbs-616318




24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump: Why hasn't Samantha Bee been fired over crude Ivanka remark? (Original Post) DonViejo Jun 2018 OP
"When you repeat Trump, you help Trump." Nm sharedvalues Jun 2018 #1
The truth is an absolute defense against ranting maniacs bucolic_frolic Jun 2018 #2
Why did thousands of American citizens perish in Puerto Rico bronxiteforever Jun 2018 #3
Oh please, he tossed them paper towels Rorey Jun 2018 #6
Thanks Rorey! bronxiteforever Jun 2018 #11
How about because him suggesting it violates US Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 11 227 forgotmylogin Jun 2018 #4
Good point, thanks. Miles above my reaction Hortensis Jun 2018 #17
Maybe because the comments weren't racist? thesquanderer Jun 2018 #5
Exactly! Rorey Jun 2018 #8
One is a racist comment, one is a comment on character...why is it so hard to tell the difference?? Fred Sanders Jun 2018 #12
Samantha's Winning Solution Roy Rolling Jun 2018 #7
Good plan, except that she's not eligible Rorey Jun 2018 #9
Because she was right, leftynyc Jun 2018 #10
C%nt v P%ssy displacedtexan Jun 2018 #13
IQ45, why hasn't your staffer been fired over her crude John McCain remark? LastLiberal in PalmSprings Jun 2018 #14
And to you daughter spawn of the play at President.. relogic Jun 2018 #15
False equivalency between Barr and Bee Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2018 #16
"put on something tight and low cut..." JohnnyRingo Jun 2018 #18
Sad thing though, Samantha was right. Ivanka is a cunt in most definitions of the word. notdarkyet Jun 2018 #19
I've wondered.... Plucketeer Jun 2018 #20
Why aren't they firing the pussy-grabbing son of a bitch shithole president dalton99a Jun 2018 #21
Because it was vulgar, but not racist TexasBushwhacker Jun 2018 #22
Let's talk crude: You salivating over your own daughter. Marie Marie Jun 2018 #23
Only Trump can use vulgarities.... pfitz59 Jun 2018 #24

Rorey

(8,445 posts)
6. Oh please, he tossed them paper towels
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 08:27 AM
Jun 2018

Such a noble act.

And now you think he should acknowledge their/our losses? Apparently you have him confused with normal humans who actually care about others.

Seriously, good point. Thank you.

bronxiteforever

(9,287 posts)
11. Thanks Rorey!
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 08:40 AM
Jun 2018

Cheetos distraction trick never gets old for the media, even in light of all we know.
We can’t (nation not us) even pay attention to thousands of American deaths.
It’s enough to makes the stones in the ground weep.

forgotmylogin

(7,528 posts)
4. How about because him suggesting it violates US Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 11 227
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 08:21 AM
Jun 2018
(a) Whoever, being a covered government person, with the intent to influence, solely on the basis of partisan political affiliation, an employment decision or employment practice of any private entity—
(1) takes or withholds, or offers or threatens to take or withhold, an official act, or
(2) influences, or offers or threatens to influence, the official act of another,
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than 15 years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.
(b) In this section, the term “covered government person” means
(1) a Senator or Representative in, or a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to, the Congress;
(2) an employee of either House of Congress; or
(3) the President, Vice President, an employee of the United StatesPostal Service or the Postal Regulatory Commission, or any other executive branch employee (as such term is defined under section 2105 of title 5, United States Code).

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/227#

If she were fired for it now, Bee can probably win a huge settlement. This is why government officials usually don't weigh in during litigation or court cases because as it turns out, there's no faster way to get a judge to throw a case out because there's potentially no more significant way to prejudice a jury pool and proceedings than the POTUS giving an opinion.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
17. Good point, thanks. Miles above my reaction
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 09:56 AM
Jun 2018

that to Trump the word's used for women in its most indecent dehumanizing way because that's how he regards us.

Bee used the mercifully far more common meaning of being a...schmuck. Turns out there are very few substitutable synonyms that don't involve a body part. I imagine jerk has a vulgar origin. Which would be related to that of schmuck as checking that origin reveals. (!)

thesquanderer

(11,989 posts)
5. Maybe because the comments weren't racist?
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 08:25 AM
Jun 2018

You can argue about whether SB should lose her show, but you can't say she did the same as what Roseanne did.

Rorey

(8,445 posts)
8. Exactly!
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 08:30 AM
Jun 2018

Roseanne made comments based on someone's race and (her perception of their) heritage.

Samantha Bee made her comments based on Ivanka's actions.

Huge difference.

Roy Rolling

(6,917 posts)
7. Samantha's Winning Solution
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 08:29 AM
Jun 2018

On her next show, she should call the entire Trump family "rapists", and then announce her candidacy for president.

That's a winning strategy.

Rorey

(8,445 posts)
9. Good plan, except that she's not eligible
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 08:34 AM
Jun 2018

At least I don't think so, because she is Canadian/American.

But I get your point.

displacedtexan

(15,696 posts)
13. C%nt v P%ssy
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 09:09 AM
Jun 2018

Hm. I thought I was supposed to accept President Half Day's language as just locker room talk.

relogic

(155 posts)
15. And to you daughter spawn of the play at President..
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 09:35 AM
Jun 2018

May we ask “Why hasn’t your father been fired over his crude...

Where to begin.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,002 posts)
16. False equivalency between Barr and Bee
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 09:46 AM
Jun 2018

Bee (wrongly) used a misogynistic word AGAINST a misogynistic racist regime.

Barr (wrongly) used a racist word SUPPORTING a misogynistic racist regime.

notdarkyet

(2,226 posts)
19. Sad thing though, Samantha was right. Ivanka is a cunt in most definitions of the word.
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 10:33 AM
Jun 2018

A cunt is a cunt and Ivanka is definitely a cunt. First time I have ever called someone a cunt. Don’t like the word, but if anyone deserves to be called a cunt it is Ivanka.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
20. I've wondered....
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 11:32 AM
Jun 2018

Given 45's obsession with his daughter..... are we SURE she's HIS daughter? Maybe Donald has a truly awful secret that he sees as leeway to viewing her with a carnal eye.

dalton99a

(81,512 posts)
21. Why aren't they firing the pussy-grabbing son of a bitch shithole president
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 11:44 AM
Jun 2018
https://www.thedailybeast.com/forget-samantha-beedonald-trump-has-called-women-cnt-for-30-years
Forget Samantha Bee—Donald Trump Has Called Women ‘C*nt’ for 30 Years
The White House’s war on the ‘Full Frontal’ host risks renewing public attention on Trump’s own alleged use of the word ‘c*nt’ to describe at least three women since the 1980s.
Scott Bixby
05.31.18 7:42 PM ET

TexasBushwhacker

(20,190 posts)
22. Because it was vulgar, but not racist
Fri Jun 1, 2018, 12:01 PM
Jun 2018

Trump says vulgar (and racist) stuff all the time. Why would he hold a TV personality to a higher standard?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump: Why hasn't Samanth...