Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,047 posts)
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 05:59 PM Aug 2012

John Sununu calls major TV networks ‘hypocritical’ on convention coverage

Source: Washington Post

A leading surrogate for Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign called the major television networks “hypocritical” for making millions of dollars from campaign advertisements but reserving only three hours for prime-time broadcasts from the Republican National Convention.

John H. Sununu, a former New Hampshire governor and White House chief of staff, said in an interview Saturday that the three major broadcast networks “have become great takers and not enough givers,” pointing to their decision not to broadcast from Tampa on Monday, the convention’s first day.

ABC, CBS and NBC will each broadcast from the convention for one hour on Tuesday and Wednesday nights, as well as on Thursday night, when Romney will deliver his acceptance speech. The networks will give equal time to the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte next month.

GOP officials failed to persuade the major broadcast networks to add coverage on Monday night, although C-SPAN and the cable news networks are planning complete live coverage of the entire convention.

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/john-sununu-calls-major-tv-networks-hypocritical-on-convention-coverage/2012/08/25/70b3c592-eecf-11e1-b829-786e028dccb3_story.html

77 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Sununu calls major TV networks ‘hypocritical’ on convention coverage (Original Post) alp227 Aug 2012 OP
Waaaa! Waaaa! n/t Raven Aug 2012 #1
EXACTLY!! SkyDaddy7 Aug 2012 #66
I'd rather see retrospect films on the life of Neil Armstrong and the contributions he monmouth Aug 2012 #2
Yup. Panasonic Aug 2012 #6
That would be nice. . . daligirl519 Aug 2012 #16
LOL..what? No Cha Aug 2012 #64
I think that would be wonderful. Remind people what america is great at doing. southernyankeebelle Aug 2012 #25
And that is what the repubs are afraid will happen again if they let President Obama shine, madokie Aug 2012 #58
I agree but we must keep Obama in office. southernyankeebelle Aug 2012 #68
No doubt madokie Aug 2012 #76
It's the glory of the unregulated private sector thucythucy Aug 2012 #3
very nice point hollysmom Aug 2012 #12
Love it. Mz Pip Aug 2012 #20
Go fuck yourself, you lying bastard. TahitiNut Aug 2012 #4
John incorrectly calls them "hypocritical", instead of the correct word SDjack Aug 2012 #5
Mr. Sununu, takes one to know one Demeter Aug 2012 #46
Nothing stopping the RNC from buying gavel-to-gavel coverage on every network . . . Journeyman Aug 2012 #7
They should capitulate at the last minute... Blue State Bandit Aug 2012 #8
Hey, I think they should take the money and do no coverage at all! mbperrin Aug 2012 #9
Actually, I agree with him. I remember when there was gavel to totodeinhere Aug 2012 #10
PBS - Gavel to Gavel BumRushDaShow Aug 2012 #15
PBS - Gavel to Gavel AlbertCat Aug 2012 #21
Exactly. BumRushDaShow Aug 2012 #28
We could mandate that they do in the public interest, using the public broadcast spectrum... JHB Aug 2012 #18
Agreed Sherman A1 Aug 2012 #40
In the old days nominating conventions used to be an actual contest for delegates but xtraxritical Aug 2012 #59
Maybe it was a civics lesson when things actually happened at the conventions, NYC Liberal Aug 2012 #50
The conventions ceased to have any relevance a long time ago. Warren Stupidity Aug 2012 #75
The "market" has decided Snotnunu BumRushDaShow Aug 2012 #11
Sununu - blaaaahhh. SutaUvaca Aug 2012 #13
The market speaks, John.....nt msanthrope Aug 2012 #14
But ABC, NBC and CBS are businesses that exist to avebury Aug 2012 #17
umm, john, do you REALLLLY want the people to see what is going on at your convention? niyad Aug 2012 #19
This video immediately came to mind: Jamaal510 Aug 2012 #22
It is nothing short of despicable that these networks get free licences dsc Aug 2012 #23
There are plenty of places to see and hear their lies. julian09 Aug 2012 #33
I don't care how many places there are dsc Aug 2012 #42
They are covering an hour nightly. enough julian09 Aug 2012 #49
not by a long shot dsc Aug 2012 #61
Petty whines will increase as the barometric pressure drops Deb Aug 2012 #24
He would know hypocrisy. liberal N proud Aug 2012 #26
How would Sununu even know? The only channel those fools watch is fox noise. madinmaryland Aug 2012 #27
So they made a lot of money and can maximize their profit and make brewens Aug 2012 #29
Who wants to see the repubs 24/7? muntrv Aug 2012 #30
Somebody needs to define "hypocritical" for him. nolabear Aug 2012 #31
That free market's a bitch eh John? I guess y'all are not that interesting! Dustlawyer Aug 2012 #32
Just another GOP suckling at the government teat while in office,,,, benld74 Aug 2012 #34
Look at the birght side: more time can be spent in the strip clubs and brothels! CTyankee Aug 2012 #35
Sounds like what Sununothing is prosposing is old fashioned corruption and graft. Tanuki Aug 2012 #36
This turd wipe is one sick bastard. Hulk Aug 2012 #37
Erm... great takers and not enough givers? Let's see... I wonder if I can come up with an analogy truthisfreedom Aug 2012 #38
No one really gives a shit what The Wizard Aug 2012 #39
In the current political climate there's no need for gavel-to-gavel coverage jmowreader Aug 2012 #41
I lost any respect for him after the Soledad O'Brien interview Canuckistanian Aug 2012 #43
He would ailsagirl Aug 2012 #44
Did he complain in 2004 when they first went to 3 hours? karynnj Aug 2012 #45
The networks played all 3 hours in 2004? alp227 Aug 2012 #57
Yes karynnj Aug 2012 #72
oh my bad i thought you meant 3 hours a night. alp227 Aug 2012 #73
Not your fault - my writing was ambiguous karynnj Aug 2012 #77
Maybe the problem is that conventions are now completely scripted? starroute Aug 2012 #47
Right on. No news at the conventions. The Presidential Electoral cycle is too long and drawn out. nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2012 #48
Hey pal, it's a business. no_hypocrisy Aug 2012 #51
What? oldsarge54 Aug 2012 #52
The GOP--the party of whiners. n/t tooeyeten Aug 2012 #53
Mr Sununu, it really doesn't matter anymore. mwooldri Aug 2012 #54
I'm just guessing here, EC Aug 2012 #55
poor johnny, no one cares what you think anymore... madrchsod Aug 2012 #56
I would think that Mitt the Twitt will get plenty of coverage on Faux. olddad56 Aug 2012 #60
Nothing like WHINING coming from Cha Aug 2012 #62
I can only hope Sununu keeps running his mouth for the next 3+ months davidpdx Aug 2012 #63
Who cares what "Johnny the Groper" thinks? MADem Aug 2012 #65
“We’ve got the money to put our message out." So what are you complaining about, then? wordpix Aug 2012 #67
I thought the Republics were canceling Mon anyway due to hurricane wordpix Aug 2012 #69
What swamp did they drain............. SILVER__FOX52 Aug 2012 #70
Sununu is their appointed cry baby I guess. nt BootinUp Aug 2012 #71
The conventions ceased to be news events decades ago. Warren Stupidity Aug 2012 #74

monmouth

(21,078 posts)
2. I'd rather see retrospect films on the life of Neil Armstrong and the contributions he
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:05 PM
Aug 2012

made in his lifetime. Re-playing of the moon landing would be wonderful for the generation that came after.

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
6. Yup.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:12 PM
Aug 2012

I would rather watch the funeral of Neil Armstrong than to watch a monkey flinging and screeching morons.

daligirl519

(285 posts)
16. That would be nice. . .
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:28 PM
Aug 2012

but I would rather watch 24-hour coverage of fungus growing than that Hellfest.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
25. I think that would be wonderful. Remind people what america is great at doing.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:40 PM
Aug 2012

I remember how proud of america I was. My sister was visiting our Italian relatives in Naples and they were all gathered around the tv watching it live like we in america were. They had tears in their eyes my sister said. They were all so emotional about the landing. She said everyone hugged her and she felt like Armstrong was a relative. Everyone came over and congratulated her and said she must be proud of america. Way back then that is how people reacted to america.

madokie

(51,076 posts)
58. And that is what the repubs are afraid will happen again if they let President Obama shine,
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 10:18 PM
Aug 2012

hence the opposition to him by them. Actually that should be hatred of him by them.
Make no mistake America can and will be great.

thucythucy

(8,086 posts)
3. It's the glory of the unregulated private sector
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:06 PM
Aug 2012

at work. Isn't this the way Republicans want it? What would Ayn Rand say about the idea of private corporations being forced to "give" in the name of community service? Heaven Forfend!

Poor John. This is some vintage Republican whine.

Mz Pip

(27,452 posts)
20. Love it.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:33 PM
Aug 2012

Suununununu always talks like he has bad gas. He's so unpleasant. He radiates unpleasant.

TahitiNut

(71,611 posts)
4. Go fuck yourself, you lying bastard.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:09 PM
Aug 2012

You're one of the biggest "takers" on the planet, you self-aggrandizing asshole.


SDjack

(1,448 posts)
5. John incorrectly calls them "hypocritical", instead of the correct word
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:10 PM
Aug 2012

"greedy". Wonder why he couldn't say the word: Greedy?

Journeyman

(15,037 posts)
7. Nothing stopping the RNC from buying gavel-to-gavel coverage on every network . . .
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:16 PM
Aug 2012

as it is, the networks are simply doing what capitalists do -- making money. If Sununu has a problem with that, and thinks there needs to be more fairness in broadcasting, I'm certain there are many large groups with which he can align himself against Limbaugh and others of his ilk who seek to keep the airways exclusive and permit only considerations of the dollar to dictate content.

Blue State Bandit

(2,122 posts)
8. They should capitulate at the last minute...
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:17 PM
Aug 2012

just when the Paulites start interfering with the delegate count.

It'll give old Ben Ginsburg a coronary!

mbperrin

(7,672 posts)
9. Hey, I think they should take the money and do no coverage at all!
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:21 PM
Aug 2012

Isn't that what maximizing profit is all about? When did the Republicans become Commies!!??

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
10. Actually, I agree with him. I remember when there was gavel to
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:22 PM
Aug 2012

gavel coverage on the broadcast networks of both conventions. It was a great civics lesson. And remember that especially in these hard times no everybody can afford cable. I wish the networks would provide more coverage of both conventions.

BumRushDaShow

(129,304 posts)
28. Exactly.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:47 PM
Aug 2012

And as a sidenote, I saw today that the puppeteer who voiced Sesame Street's "Count" died. A shame that these rethugs keep trying to eliminate everything intellectual (including the CPB that produces Sesame Street) but leaves the propaganda outlets intact.

JHB

(37,161 posts)
18. We could mandate that they do in the public interest, using the public broadcast spectrum...
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:30 PM
Aug 2012

...but that would be 'communism' or regulation or one of the other things get very agitated about unless it quietly works in their favor.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
40. Agreed
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 07:44 PM
Aug 2012

The may be commercial networks, but those airwaves are held in the public trust, so they benefit from the resources of the people. Hence they have a duty to the people.

 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
59. In the old days nominating conventions used to be an actual contest for delegates but
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 11:14 PM
Aug 2012

in the last few decades they are just proforma dog and pony shows with the primaries deciding the candidates. There's really not much reason to watch gavel to gavel unless you like partisan speechifying.

NYC Liberal

(20,136 posts)
50. Maybe it was a civics lesson when things actually happened at the conventions,
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 09:07 PM
Aug 2012

when the nominees were actually decided on the floor and they went through multiple rounds of balloting to get a majority and you had all the various blocs of supporters going around trying to get votes for their guy.

Now, the conventions are formalities. They're just giant multi-day campaign rallies with lots of speeches supporting the already-decided nominee. "Gavel-to-gavel" coverage isn't nearly as important now.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
75. The conventions ceased to have any relevance a long time ago.
Mon Aug 27, 2012, 08:00 AM
Aug 2012

They became staged events, and as such ceased to be news. They are not a great civics lesson, they are an appalling display of a bankrupt culture and an ossified corrupt dysfunctional political system.

SutaUvaca

(482 posts)
13. Sununu - blaaaahhh.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:27 PM
Aug 2012

Haven't actually logged in for a year and a half until now. Just needed to say Sununu is an asshole.
I keep seeing him brought on for comment by Wolf Blitzer. Sununu is an asshole. 'Nuff said.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
17. But ABC, NBC and CBS are businesses that exist to
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:28 PM
Aug 2012

make a profit. If the Republicans want full time TV coverage of their convention then the need to get Adeslon and the Koch to put a crowbar to their wallets and pony up the money to buy the air time.

niyad

(113,510 posts)
19. umm, john, do you REALLLLY want the people to see what is going on at your convention?
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:32 PM
Aug 2012

maybe full coverage of the platform committee hearings? reallly?

Jamaal510

(10,893 posts)
22. This video immediately came to mind:
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:33 PM
Aug 2012

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="

" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

dsc

(52,166 posts)
23. It is nothing short of despicable that these networks get free licences
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:34 PM
Aug 2012

due to supposedly existing to cover news for the public and then they behave like this. They should be covering gavel to gavel.

 

julian09

(1,435 posts)
33. There are plenty of places to see and hear their lies.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 07:24 PM
Aug 2012

They want to force people to watch, take their choice away,and not let people see what they want to see.
To me their lies and distortions are bad enough in 30 second and 60 second ads; I'm NOT WATCHING hours at a time, actually none.
There is no news, there, we already know who will be the Presidental and Vice Presidental candidates.
They intend on SPENDING BILLIONS, in ads let them begin.

dsc

(52,166 posts)
42. I don't care how many places there are
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 07:46 PM
Aug 2012

these are news and deserve to be covered, as is our convention.

dsc

(52,166 posts)
61. not by a long shot
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 11:44 PM
Aug 2012

they are given licenses worth literally billions of dollars yearly and all they are asked for in return is to inform the public. I hardly think that is too much.

Deb

(3,742 posts)
24. Petty whines will increase as the barometric pressure drops
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:38 PM
Aug 2012

Jeez, just like a bunch of little kids...

brewens

(13,615 posts)
29. So they made a lot of money and can maximize their profit and make
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 06:52 PM
Aug 2012

a lot more money, by limiting TV coverage? Is doing this kind of thing usually a problem for Sununu?

nolabear

(41,990 posts)
31. Somebody needs to define "hypocritical" for him.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 07:07 PM
Aug 2012

Hmmm...with the schedule change to beginning Tuesday wonder how that's all going to work.

benld74

(9,909 posts)
34. Just another GOP suckling at the government teat while in office,,,,
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 07:31 PM
Aug 2012

Sununu angered some when he was the only governor of a U.S. state not to call for repeal of the controversial UN General Assembly Resolution 3379 ("Zionism is Racism&quot . He later reversed his position on this issue and supported the Republicans' pro-Israel 1988 platform.[11]

As White House Chief of Staff, Sununu reportedly took personal trips, for skiing and other purposes, and classified them as official, for purposes such as conservation or promoting the Thousand Points of Light.[16] The Washington Post wrote that Sununu's jets "took him to fat-cat Republican fund-raisers, ski lodges, golf resorts and even his dentist in Boston."[16] Sununu had paid the government only $892 for his more than $615,000 worth of military jet travel.[17] Sununu said that his use of the jets was necessary because he had to be near a telephone at all times for reasons of national security.[18] Sununu became the subject of much late-night television humor over the incident.[16] Sununu worsened the situation shortly afterwards when, after leaking rumors of financial difficulties in his family, he traveled to a rare stamp auction at Christie's auction house in New York City from Washington in a government limousine, spending $5,000 on rare stamps.[19] Sununu then sent the car and driver back to Washington unoccupied while he returned on a corporate jet.[19] In the course of one week, 45 newspapers ran editorials on Sununu, nearly all of them critical of his actions.[20]

Sununu repaid over $47,000 to the government for the flights on the orders of White House counsel C. Boyden Gray, with the help of the Republican Party.[21] However, the reimbursements were at commercial rates, which are about one-tenth the cost of the actual flights; one ski trip to Vail, Colorado alone had cost taxpayers $86,330.[22]

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
35. Look at the birght side: more time can be spent in the strip clubs and brothels!
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 07:36 PM
Aug 2012

I just hope we get some juicy stories out of Tampa on this!

Tanuki

(14,920 posts)
36. Sounds like what Sununothing is prosposing is old fashioned corruption and graft.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 07:40 PM
Aug 2012

I'm sure the Koch brothers are ticked that their wealth did not purchase what they expected. Maybe they will do as Rupert Murdoch did and buy their own network so they can float whatever delusions they please and cover whatever interests them.

 

Hulk

(6,699 posts)
37. This turd wipe is one sick bastard.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 07:40 PM
Aug 2012

I've watched him a few times lately, and he is one snorting, insane horse's ass. He seems to get angry and starts foaming at the mouth as he ARGUES back with the host. What an ass wipe. Where did they pull this dumb ass out from under?

truthisfreedom

(23,151 posts)
38. Erm... great takers and not enough givers? Let's see... I wonder if I can come up with an analogy
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 07:40 PM
Aug 2012

that helps you understand, John Sununu. How about the ultra-rich, who pay the least percentage of their income in taxes?

jmowreader

(50,562 posts)
41. In the current political climate there's no need for gavel-to-gavel coverage
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 07:45 PM
Aug 2012

We don't need to be "introduced" to the candidates. The Democratic candidate is the incumbent president and the Republican candidate has been in full-on general-election campaign mode since the last not-Romney fell.

We already know who's going to be on both tickets in November, unless Romney winds up doing the perp walk in front of the SEC between now and then.

We can pretty much figure out what both campaigns' platforms will be: Obama's will be "finish what we started" and Romney's will be red meat for the teabaggers--repeal everything Obama did, ban abortion, cut spending on everything but the army, and cut taxes.

The only reason anyone outside the hardcore political junkie class and high-school history students who have to write papers about the conventions for class would even watch anything but the acceptance speeches at either convention, is if the Republicans shoot Romney tomorrow night and a brokered convention ensues. Otherwise, all the newsworthy things that could have happened already have.

Canuckistanian

(42,290 posts)
43. I lost any respect for him after the Soledad O'Brien interview
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 08:05 PM
Aug 2012

He's a bought-out hack, nothing more, nothing less.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
72. Yes
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 10:44 PM
Aug 2012

In 2000, they reduced the time to 9 hours. In 2004, it was reduced to 4 hours and in addition for the first time ABC, NBC, and CBS did not do the typical puff piece biography they always did that essentially tried to make the candidate's life lead to his nomination by his party. It was a struggle to do this in 2000 for Bush, but Kerry's lifetime of service and accomplishment would have made this simple. (CNN and MSNBC both did stories JUST on Kerry's 1971 protests, very commendable, but the ONLY controversial part of his life.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
77. Not your fault - my writing was ambiguous
Mon Aug 27, 2012, 08:35 AM
Aug 2012

I WISH they would have given Kerry 9 hours. He used the 3 as best he could, but 9 hours could have covered his life a lot better. ( That could have nipped the Republican accusations that he did nothing in the Senate in the bud. In fact, he was a REAL policy wonk - unlike Ryan, who is just an ideologue. There were reasons the Democrats years before he ran made an exception to let him sit on the Finance committee in addition to the SFRC and Commerce - when there was a Democratic rule that a Senator could have only 2 of a list of high powered committees.)

As to Romney, given that most of his life can't be talked about - at least by us (or per Romney) it would be no fair - I assume they want the extra 6 hours to bash Obama.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
47. Maybe the problem is that conventions are now completely scripted?
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 08:37 PM
Aug 2012

It's been a long time since they allowed anything that could pass for actual news.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mississippi_Freedom_Democratic_Party

Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party

The MFDP sent its elected delegates by bus to the convention. There they challenged the right of the Mississippi Democratic Party's delegation to participate in the convention, claiming that the regulars had been illegally elected in a completely segregated process that violated both party regulations and federal law, and that furthermore the regulars had no intention of supporting Lyndon B. Johnson, the party's presidential candidate, in the November election. They therefore asked that the MFDP delegates be seated rather than the segregationist regulars.[2]

The Democratic Party referred the challenge to the Convention Credentials Committee. The MFDP delegates lobbied and argued their case, and large groups of supporters and volunteers established an around-the-clock picket line on the Boardwalk just outside the convention, which garnered considerable publicity.

The Credentials Committee televised its proceedings, which allowed the nation to see and hear the testimony of the MFDP delegates, particularly the testimony of Fannie Lou Hamer, who gave a moving and evocative portrayal of her hard brutalized life as a sharecropper on a cotton plantation in the Mississippi Delta and the retaliation inflicted on her for trying to register to vote.

After that, most knowledgeable observers thought the majority of the delegates were ready to unseat the regulars and seat the MFDP delegates in their place. But some of the all-white delegations from other southern states threatened to leave the convention and bolt the party (as they had done in previous years) if the regular Mississippi delegation was unseated, and Johnson feared losing Southern support in the coming campaign against Republican Party candidate Barry Goldwater.



oldsarge54

(582 posts)
52. What?
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 09:11 PM
Aug 2012

Republican politicians angry for corporations putting profits over the consumer's needs? Now I am more likely to believe that THAT is a sign of the end of times.

mwooldri

(10,303 posts)
54. Mr Sununu, it really doesn't matter anymore.
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 09:35 PM
Aug 2012

In the days when broadcast TV reigned supreme... and with analog cable in its infancy... for networks to run full coverage would be expected.

Now we have digital terrestrial TV, lots of choice on cable or satellite (note: didn't say all of it was good though) and the Internet... anyone who really wants to watch the full convention can.

The broadcasters have moved on with the times. Appears Mr. Sununu has not.

EC

(12,287 posts)
55. I'm just guessing here,
Sat Aug 25, 2012, 09:37 PM
Aug 2012

but I think the campaign needs the ad time more than the network needs them. Don't they get a discounted rate?

Cha

(297,497 posts)
62. Nothing like WHINING coming from
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 01:39 AM
Aug 2012

Big Mouth, "Is PObama American enough(some such drivel..I can't keep up), Sununu.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
63. I can only hope Sununu keeps running his mouth for the next 3+ months
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 01:39 AM
Aug 2012

like he has recently. It's going to get him and Romney in trouble.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
65. Who cares what "Johnny the Groper" thinks?
Sun Aug 26, 2012, 01:56 AM
Aug 2012

The old pervert can run his mouth all he wants--who's going to listen? Answer--NO ONE.

He's stuck sucking up to CSPAN, the entity some Republicans wanted to axe. Deal with it, putz--RMoney is more boring than the WORST sitcom.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»John Sununu calls major T...