Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Initech

(100,068 posts)
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 09:15 AM Jul 2018

Lawsuits claim MGM has no liability to Las Vegas shooting victims

Last edited Tue Jul 17, 2018, 01:20 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: Las Vegas Review Journal

MGM Resorts International has filed federal lawsuits against more than 1,000 Las Vegas mass shooting victims in an effort to avoid liability.

The company, which owns Mandalay Bay and the Route 91 Harvest festival venue, argues that it cannot be held liable for Oct. 1 deaths, injuries or other damages, adding that any claims against MGM parties “must be dismissed,” according to complaints filed Friday in Nevada and California.

“Plaintiffs have no liability of any kind to defendants,” the complaints argue.

The company cites a 2002 federal act that extends liability protection to any company that uses “anti-terrorism” technology or services that can “help prevent and respond to mass violence.”

In this case, the company argues, the security vendor MGM hired for Route 91, Contemporary Services Corp., was protected from liability because its services had been certified by the Department of Homeland Security for “protecting against and responding to acts of mass injury and destruction.”

The lawsuits argue that this protection also extends to MGM, since MGM hired the security company.

Read more: https://www.reviewjournal.com/crime/homicides/lawsuits-claim-mgm-has-no-liability-to-las-vegas-shooting-victims/



This is utterly appalling. A giant corporation like MGM is spitting on the graves of the victims in that horrible shooting. This is a new low.
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lawsuits claim MGM has no liability to Las Vegas shooting victims (Original Post) Initech Jul 2018 OP
My God. MGM's board and CEO should be put before a firing squad. lagomorph777 Jul 2018 #1
Just when you thought the 'bottom' had been reached. FailureToCommunicate Jul 2018 #2
My god, that was only last October? Gidney N Cloyd Jul 2018 #3
Greed is a disease. This is already backfiring, MGM trending on Twitter for the wrong reasons. sarcasmo Jul 2018 #4
I think greed is an addiction. Initech Jul 2018 #21
Metro Goldwyn-Mayer? truthisfreedom Jul 2018 #5
But it's not Terrorism atreides1 Jul 2018 #6
Job creators always talk about putting America first IronLionZion Jul 2018 #7
Bankrupt MGM! mpcamb Jul 2018 #8
Profit before people heaven05 Jul 2018 #9
Honestly I hope it gets dropped in court. Initech Jul 2018 #13
These GOP corporate entities want total unrestricted gun sales workinclasszero Jul 2018 #10
What is MGM talking about? It has to prove that its negligence in allowing no_hypocrisy Jul 2018 #11
Did the people at the front desk see the weapons? christx30 Jul 2018 #15
A petition for removal is not really "suing"... so the click bait premise of the whole article lost. Fred Sanders Jul 2018 #20
The surveillance tape showed bulky stuff that was covered on the baggage cart. no_hypocrisy Jul 2018 #22
Bad news for the plaintiffs... BeatStanford Jul 2018 #12
I'm not a lawyer but I think the State of Nevada needs to stop this FakeNoose Jul 2018 #14
I thought our SC told us Corgigal Jul 2018 #16
so you can now get sued by the place where you got shot dembotoz Jul 2018 #17
Good one! Bayard Jul 2018 #18
This is the defendants and their insurance ... Whiskeytide Jul 2018 #19
putting this back at the top UpInArms Jul 2018 #23
Unless the defendants of this case, the victims, Cold War Spook Jul 2018 #24

atreides1

(16,076 posts)
6. But it's not Terrorism
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 09:41 AM
Jul 2018

As defined by the FBI, this multiple murder is not terrorism!

I don't think this will go very far...but with a federal judge, you never know!!!

IronLionZion

(45,433 posts)
7. Job creators always talk about putting America first
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 09:42 AM
Jul 2018

Those victims were this corporation's customers.

While I get that there's only so much a hotel can do to prevent such an unthinkable tragedy, I would hold NRA and politicians more responsible. Especially the politicians who keep telling us that terrorists are brown and we should ignore the many angry white males killing Americans because each one is a mentally ill lone wolf, not a terrorist with legally purchased weapons of mass murder.

While the TSA and other government agencies harass brown people and sexually assault attractive women in skirts, the Stephen Paddocks of the world always get every courtesy and benefit of a doubt. Racism puts Americans in danger.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
9. Profit before people
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 09:58 AM
Jul 2018

a perfect example of the predatory nature of our country's financial/judicial system which has always protected wealth over the needs of the common citizen. Now we'll see what becomes of this counter-suit by MGM.

Initech

(100,068 posts)
13. Honestly I hope it gets dropped in court.
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 10:45 AM
Jul 2018

And the executives involved all get fired and blacklisted from the gaming industry. That would be the best possible outcome. The sad thing is MGM owns half the Strip, it would be pretty difficult to stage a boycott like that. I hope their PR department is working overtime.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
10. These GOP corporate entities want total unrestricted gun sales
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 10:00 AM
Jul 2018

but weasel out of any liability for the inevitable results of that policy.

Watch this go all the way up to Dotard Traitor's kangaroo SCOTUS and be upheld!

no_hypocrisy

(46,088 posts)
11. What is MGM talking about? It has to prove that its negligence in allowing
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 10:01 AM
Jul 2018

its guest, the shooter, to check in with a multitude of weapons, which he subsequently used to perpetrate mass murder.

christx30

(6,241 posts)
15. Did the people at the front desk see the weapons?
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 10:56 AM
Jul 2018

Is MGM supposed to do searches of its guests prior to admitting them into the building?

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
20. A petition for removal is not really "suing"... so the click bait premise of the whole article lost.
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 11:44 AM
Jul 2018

Armchair lawyers, what ya gonna do?

 

BeatStanford

(20 posts)
12. Bad news for the plaintiffs...
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 10:08 AM
Jul 2018

At least one of their attorneys may or may not have ever seen a petition for removal before.

FakeNoose

(32,634 posts)
14. I'm not a lawyer but I think the State of Nevada needs to stop this
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 10:55 AM
Jul 2018

This is an outrage, and a new low.

If these lawsuits are allowed it could trigger a boycott of Las Vegas tourism.

Just sayin'

Corgigal

(9,291 posts)
16. I thought our SC told us
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 11:02 AM
Jul 2018

that corporations are people? If true, write those checks, and it will never be enough.

dembotoz

(16,802 posts)
17. so you can now get sued by the place where you got shot
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 11:09 AM
Jul 2018

pretty damn funny

will white star lines sue the folks who drowned on the titanic?
how dare they not swim better!!!!

Whiskeytide

(4,461 posts)
19. This is the defendants and their insurance ...
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 11:36 AM
Jul 2018

... companies filing an action to declare them immune from liability. They aren’t suing the victims for anything other than a declaration on the issue of liability. They have to name all the victims/estates in order for the ruling - whatever it may eventually be - to have a binding effect.

It’s kind of shitty - and is certainly a bad look - but the alternative would be defending dozens of separate actions and raising the defense in each one. They have an argument that has some merit. The concept of a property owner being liable for the criminal acts of a third person has always been a tough win for victims.

They are just trying to be more efficient by filing a single action to address that issue and apply it to all the existing and potential claims. It’s kinda of a dick thing to do, but not as nefarious as its being made out to be.

 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
24. Unless the defendants of this case, the victims,
Tue Jul 17, 2018, 05:42 PM
Jul 2018

have proof that employees of the hotel knew what was in those bags, I don't see where the hotel is liable.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Lawsuits claim MGM has no...