White House: Trump considering revoking clearances from former CIA, FBI chiefs
Source: Politico
07/23/2018 03:06 PM EDT
President Donald Trump is considering revoking security clearances from ex-officials including former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Monday.
Sanders said Trump believes the former officials "politicized" their positions by accusing Trump of inappropriate contact with Russia, and she said in some cases they "monetized their clearances," without clarifying what she meant.
"The fact that people with security clearances are making baseless charges provides inappropriate legitimacy to accusations with zero evidence," Sanders said. She also said Trump was eyeing clearances held by former NSA Director Michael Hayden, former national security adviser Susan Rice and former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe.
###
Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/23/white-house-trump-considering-revoking-clearances-from-former-cia-fbi-chiefs-735968
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,567 posts)This is unprecedented in the history of the US, MSNBC said earlier.
Mr.Bill
(24,238 posts)it won't be a problem, there's plenty of people in high positions in the White House that tell us everything anyway.
Perseus
(4,341 posts)"There was a donkey tied to a tree, the devil came and let the donkey loose. The donkey went into a barn and started eating everything in its path. The farmer's wife saw what the donkey was doing, picked up a rifle and shot the donkey. The donkey's owner heard the shot, saw the donkey was not tied, run to the farmer's barn and saw his donkey had been shot, so he picked up a gun and shot the farmer's wife.
The farmer heard the shot, run to the barn and saw his wife dead, so he picked up a gun and shot the donkey's owner. The donkey owner's children learned of the death of their father so they burned down the farmers ranch. The farmer took vengeance and killed all the donkey owner's children.
Someone asked the devil what it had done, and the devil answered "nothing, I just let the donkey loose."
Moral of the story: If you want to destroy a country, let the donkey loose. 1/3 of the USA has let Trump loose.
Dave Starsky
(5,914 posts)They exist, and have stood the test of time, for a very good reason.
Thanks for that one. So true.
Chickensoup
(650 posts)and patriots lose theirs.
Give me a break!!!
JDC
(10,114 posts)A la Jared Kushner, Rob Porter, etc.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)treated after they leave office.
djacq
(1,633 posts)Vets should take notice CIC being spiteful.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)when he stated John Brennan was violating his clearance by using secret issues to accuse the President.
Yep Rand Paul put this idea in Trumps head
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)More of a sour, metallic odor?
That's how the White House smells today.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,955 posts)Ztolkins
(429 posts)Why do these former officials have/need security clearances?
BumRushDaShow
(128,441 posts)Ztolkins
(429 posts)Thanks!
B2G
(9,766 posts)I really don't understand why any ex-employee retains clearance.
BumRushDaShow
(128,441 posts)these types of things take a long time (and resources - often contractors, which cost $$$) to complete. When you have tens of thousands of generic new civil servants going through clearances, you can imagine the backlog (which has been in place for decades). Of course Drumpf has no clue about anything to do with "government" because to him "government = bad and useless", so this sort of nonsense is to be expected.
From what I understand, once they have done one for what these Intel folks had, it is good for like 5 years for "Top Secret" and 10 years for "Secret". The last "Confidential" one I had before I retired was supposedly good for 15 years.
B2G
(9,766 posts)Thanks!
BumRushDaShow
(128,441 posts)turbinetree
(24,683 posts)information they might know about...................they have the clearance for about one year.
Anyone that has worked for the government in any capacity employee, contractor, manufacture has the clearance, for about one year............this act, this "fuming" that this traitor wants to do because he and his team are being boxed in, he attacks the fundamental right to free speech, these men and woman have a right to comment on this traitor, just, like I did. I may not be as powerful as them, but I have a right and we should call out a wanna be, putin clone....................
BumRushDaShow
(128,441 posts)but for the highest level ones, the timeframes are generally shorter than the lower level ones like I had.
turbinetree
(24,683 posts)Mine was about 5 years after I left, then I would have to re-apply............
BumRushDaShow
(128,441 posts)Grasswire2
(13,565 posts)Clapper
Hayden
Brennan
Comey
McCabe
Rice
Grasswire2
(13,565 posts)FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,441 posts)They are acting as if any of them can just randomly walk into a government office and ask for information.
If anyone was "abusing" someone's "security clearance" it was most likely Ghouliani and his apparent contacts with certain NY FBI folks during the 2016 campaign season.
pecosbob
(7,533 posts)Cognitive_Resonance
(1,546 posts)dem4decades
(11,269 posts)orangecrush
(19,409 posts)Mueller is closing in!
?fit=559%2C485
janx
(24,128 posts)SkatmanRoth
(843 posts)Just don't tell anybody
C_U_L8R
(44,987 posts)And lunch. And dinner.
htuttle
(23,738 posts)They were some of the people who briefed Trump before the inauguration with the raw evidence that Russia had hacked the election to Trump's benefit.
So when Brennan speaks about Trump, Trump knows that Brennan knows he's guilty. Has nothing to do with their current security clearances.
DeminPennswoods
(15,265 posts)forget what they know.
I'm a little surprised that former officials can keep their clearances after they leave govt. Figluzzi said on Wallace's show that he had his for a year after he retired.
htuttle
(23,738 posts)They keep their clearances in case someone needs to ask them something pertinent to their tenure. Or in case they need to come back for some reason.
At least that's how I understand it.
DeminPennswoods
(15,265 posts)Given the civilian continuity in federal agencies, I don't see this need for current political appointees to "talk to" the former occupants of the job.
OTOH, not having a security clearance can put the kibosh on the kind of well-paying contractor/private sector jobs these guys might want.