Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 03:13 PM Jul 2018

White House: Trump considering revoking clearances from former CIA, FBI chiefs

Source: Politico



07/23/2018 03:06 PM EDT

President Donald Trump is considering revoking security clearances from ex-officials including former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI Director James Comey and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said Monday.

Sanders said Trump believes the former officials "politicized" their positions by accusing Trump of inappropriate contact with Russia, and she said in some cases they "monetized their clearances," without clarifying what she meant.

"The fact that people with security clearances are making baseless charges provides inappropriate legitimacy to accusations with zero evidence," Sanders said. She also said Trump was eyeing clearances held by former NSA Director Michael Hayden, former national security adviser Susan Rice and former FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe.

###

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/23/white-house-trump-considering-revoking-clearances-from-former-cia-fbi-chiefs-735968

40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House: Trump considering revoking clearances from former CIA, FBI chiefs (Original Post) DonViejo Jul 2018 OP
This is yet another step toward a dictatorship of the incompetent. Sophia4 Jul 2018 #1
Even Nixon didn't go this far. BigmanPigman Jul 2018 #25
They should reply by saying Mr.Bill Jul 2018 #2
A short story with a moral Perseus Jul 2018 #3
I love those kinds of fables. Dave Starsky Jul 2018 #9
The traitor gets to keep his clearance Chickensoup Jul 2018 #4
Yet those who can't attain clearances are given a pass. JDC Jul 2018 #5
IQ-45 is telling us how he and his administration should be NCjack Jul 2018 #6
Orange Clown abuses power that he shouldn't have. djacq Jul 2018 #7
Rand Paul started the wheels turning on ths issue INdemo Jul 2018 #8
Ever notice that fear sweat smells different than regular sweat? lagomorph777 Jul 2018 #10
If "baseless charges" is the threshold then 90% of White House staff would have it revoked. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jul 2018 #11
Forgive the ignorance... Ztolkins Jul 2018 #12
If they want to work as contractors to the federal government. nt BumRushDaShow Jul 2018 #16
Ohhh, okay. Ztolkins Jul 2018 #21
Couldn't they reapply if they actually take a position? B2G Jul 2018 #22
They can reapply but as you have seen from the fiasco in the West Wing BumRushDaShow Jul 2018 #26
Did not know that. B2G Jul 2018 #31
No prob! BumRushDaShow Jul 2018 #34
They have the clearance because they have to sometimes go to meetings "if asked" some turbinetree Jul 2018 #23
The clearances are usually good for more than a year BumRushDaShow Jul 2018 #30
Yepper, spot on turbinetree Jul 2018 #33
Doing that e-QIP thing was a PITA. BumRushDaShow Jul 2018 #35
...six people Grasswire2 Jul 2018 #13
NBC calling it an "ENEMIES LIST" nt Grasswire2 Jul 2018 #14
EXCELLENT. (n/t) FreepFryer Jul 2018 #32
This is just silly BumRushDaShow Jul 2018 #15
Oh, looky...Republicans throwing conservatives under the bus pecosbob Jul 2018 #17
Another abuse of power charge for the articles of impeachment. nt Cognitive_Resonance Jul 2018 #18
The charges are stacking so high they're going to fall over. dem4decades Jul 2018 #27
Pure fear orangecrush Jul 2018 #19
Comey and McCabe don't even janx Jul 2018 #20
Trump is going to put Comey and McCabe on double secret probation SkatmanRoth Jul 2018 #24
Paranoia. It's what's for breakfast. C_U_L8R Jul 2018 #28
He knows that Brennan and Clapper know htuttle Jul 2018 #29
Revoking security clearance won't make them DeminPennswoods Jul 2018 #37
Just having the clearance doesn't mean they are actually read into or notified about anything htuttle Jul 2018 #38
Heard that explanation, too DeminPennswoods Jul 2018 #39
Goddamn traitor dalton99a Jul 2018 #36
If it weren't for the fact he is President: Trump would never be able to get a security clearance. YOHABLO Jul 2018 #40

Mr.Bill

(24,238 posts)
2. They should reply by saying
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 03:20 PM
Jul 2018

it won't be a problem, there's plenty of people in high positions in the White House that tell us everything anyway.

 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
3. A short story with a moral
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 03:22 PM
Jul 2018

"There was a donkey tied to a tree, the devil came and let the donkey loose. The donkey went into a barn and started eating everything in its path. The farmer's wife saw what the donkey was doing, picked up a rifle and shot the donkey. The donkey's owner heard the shot, saw the donkey was not tied, run to the farmer's barn and saw his donkey had been shot, so he picked up a gun and shot the farmer's wife.
The farmer heard the shot, run to the barn and saw his wife dead, so he picked up a gun and shot the donkey's owner. The donkey owner's children learned of the death of their father so they burned down the farmers ranch. The farmer took vengeance and killed all the donkey owner's children.
Someone asked the devil what it had done, and the devil answered "nothing, I just let the donkey loose."

Moral of the story: If you want to destroy a country, let the donkey loose. 1/3 of the USA has let Trump loose.

Dave Starsky

(5,914 posts)
9. I love those kinds of fables.
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 03:28 PM
Jul 2018

They exist, and have stood the test of time, for a very good reason.

Thanks for that one. So true.

INdemo

(6,994 posts)
8. Rand Paul started the wheels turning on ths issue
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 03:28 PM
Jul 2018

when he stated John Brennan was violating his clearance by using secret issues to accuse the President.
Yep Rand Paul put this idea in Trumps head

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
10. Ever notice that fear sweat smells different than regular sweat?
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 03:30 PM
Jul 2018

More of a sour, metallic odor?

That's how the White House smells today.

 

B2G

(9,766 posts)
22. Couldn't they reapply if they actually take a position?
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 05:09 PM
Jul 2018

I really don't understand why any ex-employee retains clearance.

BumRushDaShow

(128,441 posts)
26. They can reapply but as you have seen from the fiasco in the West Wing
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 06:02 PM
Jul 2018

these types of things take a long time (and resources - often contractors, which cost $$$) to complete. When you have tens of thousands of generic new civil servants going through clearances, you can imagine the backlog (which has been in place for decades). Of course Drumpf has no clue about anything to do with "government" because to him "government = bad and useless", so this sort of nonsense is to be expected.

From what I understand, once they have done one for what these Intel folks had, it is good for like 5 years for "Top Secret" and 10 years for "Secret". The last "Confidential" one I had before I retired was supposedly good for 15 years.

turbinetree

(24,683 posts)
23. They have the clearance because they have to sometimes go to meetings "if asked" some
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 05:24 PM
Jul 2018

information they might know about...................they have the clearance for about one year.

Anyone that has worked for the government in any capacity employee, contractor, manufacture has the clearance, for about one year............this act, this "fuming" that this traitor wants to do because he and his team are being boxed in, he attacks the fundamental right to free speech, these men and woman have a right to comment on this traitor, just, like I did. I may not be as powerful as them, but I have a right and we should call out a wanna be, putin clone....................

BumRushDaShow

(128,441 posts)
30. The clearances are usually good for more than a year
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 06:06 PM
Jul 2018

but for the highest level ones, the timeframes are generally shorter than the lower level ones like I had.

BumRushDaShow

(128,441 posts)
15. This is just silly
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 04:18 PM
Jul 2018

They are acting as if any of them can just randomly walk into a government office and ask for information.

If anyone was "abusing" someone's "security clearance" it was most likely Ghouliani and his apparent contacts with certain NY FBI folks during the 2016 campaign season.

htuttle

(23,738 posts)
29. He knows that Brennan and Clapper know
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 06:05 PM
Jul 2018

They were some of the people who briefed Trump before the inauguration with the raw evidence that Russia had hacked the election to Trump's benefit.

So when Brennan speaks about Trump, Trump knows that Brennan knows he's guilty. Has nothing to do with their current security clearances.

DeminPennswoods

(15,265 posts)
37. Revoking security clearance won't make them
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 07:21 PM
Jul 2018

forget what they know.

I'm a little surprised that former officials can keep their clearances after they leave govt. Figluzzi said on Wallace's show that he had his for a year after he retired.

htuttle

(23,738 posts)
38. Just having the clearance doesn't mean they are actually read into or notified about anything
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 07:24 PM
Jul 2018

They keep their clearances in case someone needs to ask them something pertinent to their tenure. Or in case they need to come back for some reason.

At least that's how I understand it.

DeminPennswoods

(15,265 posts)
39. Heard that explanation, too
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 09:03 PM
Jul 2018

Given the civilian continuity in federal agencies, I don't see this need for current political appointees to "talk to" the former occupants of the job.

OTOH, not having a security clearance can put the kibosh on the kind of well-paying contractor/private sector jobs these guys might want.

 

YOHABLO

(7,358 posts)
40. If it weren't for the fact he is President: Trump would never be able to get a security clearance.
Mon Jul 23, 2018, 09:59 PM
Jul 2018
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House: Trump consid...