Amazon's Facial Recognition Wrongly Identifies 28 Lawmakers, A.C.L.U. Says
Source: New York Times
Representative John Lewis of Georgia and Representative Bobby L. Rush of Illinois are both Democrats, members of the Congressional Black Caucus and civil rights leaders.
But facial recognition technology made by Amazon, which is being used by some police departments and other organizations, incorrectly matched the lawmakers with people who had been arrested for a crime, the American Civil Liberties Union reported on Thursday morning.
The errors emerged as part of a larger test in which the civil liberties group used Amazon's facial software to compare the photos of all federal lawmakers against a database of 25,000 publicly available mug shots.
In the test, the Amazon technology incorrectly matched 28 members of Congress with people who had been arrested, amounting to a 5 percent error rate among legislators. The test disproportionally misidentified African-American and Latino members of Congress as the people in mug shots.
"This test confirms that facial recognition is flawed, biased and dangerous," said Jacob Snow, a technology and civil liberties lawyer with the A.C.L.U. of Northern California...more..
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/amazon%e2%80%99s-facial-recognition-wrongly-identifies-28-lawmakers-aclu-says/ar-BBL4WWr
Proponents see it as a useful tool that can help identify criminals. It was recently used to identify the man arrested for the deadly shooting at The Capital Gazette's newsroom in Annapolis, Md. But civil liberties groups view it as a surveillance system that can inhibit people's ability to participate in political protests or go about their lives anonymously. Over the last two months, Amazon has come under increasing pressure for selling its facial technology, called Rekognition, to law enforcement agencies.
*ACLU Report, July 26, 2018, "Amazon's Face Recognition Falsely Matched 28 Members of Congress With Mugshots"
https://www.aclu.org/blog/privacy-technology/surveillance-technologies/amazons-face-recognition-falsely-matched-28
Our test used AmazonRekognition to compare images of members of Congress with a database of mugshots. The results included 28 incorrect matches.
ADX
(1,622 posts)...as the people in mug shots."
What a shock.
We really need a "rolling eyes" smiley on this board.
appalachiablue
(41,118 posts)That's some dodgy 'recognition' tech..
LakeSuperiorView
(1,533 posts)ADX
(1,622 posts)Yonnie3
(17,427 posts)ADX
(1,622 posts)Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)ancianita
(36,017 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,123 posts)beware computerization
appalachiablue
(41,118 posts)CaptainTruth
(6,585 posts)appalachiablue
(41,118 posts)The Mouth
(3,148 posts)Look for the (R). Simple 'nuff
Mr.Bill
(24,274 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,444 posts)iluvtennis
(19,844 posts)EX500rider
(10,835 posts)"Amazon took issue with the findings, saying the system needed to be set at 95% accuracy not the 80% used by ACLU."
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-44965154
Harker
(14,012 posts)to any of their own mugshots? Mr. Lewis racked up a lot of arrests in his fight for civil rights.
appalachiablue
(41,118 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,783 posts)there probably is a mug shot of the 26-year old Bobby Rush in 1972 when he was arrested and served time as a Panther.
Harker
(14,012 posts)in protesting at the Sudanese embassy.
Science usually lags way behind science fiction, but developers and users get dazzled by the possibilities. Ask anyone who has survived a bad encounter with a self driving car.
BumRushDaShow
(128,783 posts)along with Dick Gregory.
appalachiablue
(41,118 posts)28 Congress members with photos of OTHER PEOPLE arrested for a crime.
ACLU article posted with the news OP above:
"Amazons face surveillance technology is the target of growing opposition nationwide, and today, there are 28 more causes for concern. In a test the ACLU recently conducted of the facial recognition tool, called Rekognition, the software incorrectly matched 28 members of Congress, identifying them as *other people* who have been arrested for a crime...https://www.aclu.org/blog/privacy-technology/surveillance-technologies/amazons-face-recognition-falsely-matched-28
Harker
(14,012 posts)but it seems to me that if it also failed to recognize actual arrestees as who they are (or were), that ramps up the failure level to 11.
I'd hate to have my lunch money riding on that, let alone my life or liberty.
BumRushDaShow
(128,783 posts)which is why I did the -->
Although I suppose I could have done this --->
appalachiablue
(41,118 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,783 posts)Harker
(14,012 posts)I think I'm a tad out of synch.
BumRushDaShow
(128,783 posts)Harker
(14,012 posts)I'm a little awkward, as I'm new at this, but I've been what you call a lurker since the early days of DU.
You folks have caused me to think as deeply as I've thought, and to laugh loudly and often. I'm sorry it took a complete lunatic in the WH to bring me into the conversation.
I'm grateful for your welcome.
bucolic_frolic
(43,123 posts)We've breeched the limits of IT accuracy. Time for a pause on the mountain.
NBachers
(17,098 posts)paleotn
(17,911 posts)are precisely why I am not afraid of Skynet. Nor am I worried about the "singularity." Certainly not in my lifetime or the lifetimes of anyone I know.
Homer Wells
(1,576 posts)Sounds like it's working just fine.