Reporter Reviewed WH Memo That Allegedly Implicates Trump In Obstruction
Source: Talking Points Memo
By Allegra Kirkland | July 31, 2018 4:28 pm
The question of whether President Trump obstructed justice in the FBIs investigation of Michael Flynn has always hinged on his familiarity with the details of that probe and when he learned them.
A new report out Tuesday in the New York Review of Books suggests Trump knew that there was an ongoing criminal investigation into Flynn and his interactions with Russian officials when he asked then-FBI director James Comey on Feb. 14, 2017 to let Flynn go.
Reporter Murray Waas said that he reviewed a White House memo that explicitly states that when Trump pressured Comey he had just been told by two of his top aides his then chief of staff Reince Priebus and his White House counsel Don McGahn that Flynn was under criminal investigation.
According to Waas, people familiar with the matter have told him that both Priebus and McGahn also testified to Special Counsel Robert Mueller that they personally provided this information to Trump during a Jan. 26, 2017 meeting.
Read more: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/report-trump-knew-flynn-under-fbi-investigation-obstruction
Flynn, Comey, and Mueller: What Trump Knew and When He Knew It
Murray Waas
Previously undisclosed evidence in the possession of Special Counsel Robert Muellerincluding highly confidential White House records and testimony by some of President Trumps own top aidesprovides some of the strongest evidence to date implicating the president of the United States in an obstruction of justice. Several people who have reviewed a portion of this evidence say that, based on what they know, they believe it is now all but inevitable that the special counsel will complete a confidential report presenting evidence that President Trump violated the law. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who oversees the special counsels work, would then decide on turning over that report to Congress for the House of Representatives to consider whether to instigate impeachment proceedings.
The central incident in the case that the president obstructed justice was provided by former FBI Director James B. Comey, who testified that Trump pressed Comey, in a private Oval Office meeting on February 14, 2017, to shut down an FBI criminal investigation of Trumps former national security adviser, Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn. I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go, Comey has testified the president told him.
In an effort to convince Mueller that President Trump did not obstruct justice, the presidents attorneys have argued that the president could not have broken the law because the president did not know that Flynn was under criminal investigation when he pressured Comey to go easy on Flynn. In a confidential January 29 letter to the special counsel first reported by The New York Times, two of the presidents attorneys, John Dowd (who no longer represents Trump) and Jay Sekulow, maintained that the president did not obstruct justice because, even though Flynn had been questioned by the FBI, Trump believed that the FBI investigation was over, and that Flynn had been told that hed been cleared.
On its face, this is a counter-intuitive argumentfor if Trump believed that Flynn had been cleared and was no longer under investigation, there would have been no reason for the president to lean on Comey to end the FBIs investigationtelling Comey that Trump hoped that Comey would be able to see your way clear to letting this go. Yet Trumps attorneys have pursued this line of argument with the special counsel because perjury and obstruction cases depend largely on whether a prosecutor can demonstrate the intent and motivation of the person they want to charge. Its not enough to prove that the person under investigation attempted to impede an ongoing criminal investigation; the statute requires a prosecutor to prove that the person did so with the corrupt intent to protect either himself or someone else from prosecution.
more
https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2018/07/31/what-trump-knew-and-when-he-knew-it/
iluvtennis
(19,833 posts)investigation. Good to have reporter substantiate my theory.
procon
(15,805 posts)It makes sense that McGahn would inform Priebus as Trump's Chief of Staff that Flynn was under criminal investigation. So both of them notified Trump personally during a Jan. 26, 2017 meeting.
Then McGahn called Yates to return for a second in-person meeting on Jan. 27, 2017.
Trump fired Yates on January 30, 2017.
Of course Trump Knew!
FakeNoose
(32,579 posts)Obama told Trump that Flynn was bad news, don't hire him and certainly don't give him a job that requires security clearance. Being the complete asshole that he is, Trump did exactly that! Now here we are, 18 months later.
creeksneakers2
(7,472 posts)I believe Trump told Flynn to lie to the FBI.
duforsure
(11,884 posts)And if he approved everyone lying on their National Security forms assuring them it it was ok , then his fate is pretty clear he committed criminal acts to undermine our national security to cover up crimes against this country. He should be charged with many counts of treason against him, with others. He basically told Jr to lie about the meeting, and everything else too. Looks like more flippers coming soon against trump.
Crutchez_CuiBono
(7,725 posts)Hmm.
ffr
(22,665 posts)Reasoning that just doesn't add up and actions that are counter to reality.
Snellius
(6,881 posts)Josh Marshall at TPM really gets into the weeds of this stuff. Really interesting but easy to get lost. Speculating about speculations.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Just sayin....
Trump - obstructs - religiously
turbinetree
(24,683 posts)November 2018 cannot get here fast enough.......................vote