Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

nitpicker

(7,153 posts)
Thu Aug 23, 2018, 06:08 AM Aug 2018

Paris knife attack: Two killed, one seriously injured

Source: DW

Two people were killed and one seriously wounded in a knife attack in the Paris suburb of Trappes, about 30 kilometers (20 miles) southwest of the French capital.

The knife attacker was then shot dead by police. The motive for the attack was under investigation.

The local authorities tweeted that the operation was complete.
(snip)

The "Islamic State" claimed responsibility for the attack, saying one of its members had carried out the assault. The militant group did not provide any evidence.
(snip)

Read more: https://www.dw.com/en/paris-knife-attack-two-killed-one-seriously-injured/a-45191500

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Paris knife attack: Two killed, one seriously injured (Original Post) nitpicker Aug 2018 OP
It is reported that he killed his mother and sister. yallerdawg Aug 2018 #1
+1, sounds like the perfect recruiting slogan; join Isis kill your family uponit7771 Aug 2018 #2
Apparently not very. Igel Aug 2018 #3

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
1. It is reported that he killed his mother and sister.
Thu Aug 23, 2018, 07:44 AM
Aug 2018

How desperately insane do you have to be to claim responsibility for THAT?

"Look, world, this is what we do!"

Igel

(35,332 posts)
3. Apparently not very.
Thu Aug 23, 2018, 05:27 PM
Aug 2018

Depends on the why: Were they apostate? Then he's just doing justice, seeing that the laws are executed in an impartial manner. (It's not a trendy definition, but it's still used in its traditional sense).

The problem is whether that person is responsible for executing the laws, and whether religious laws must always trump secular laws. (It's clear that sometimes religious-based moral laws do: conscientious objectors, for instance, in violating the law to uphold their beliefs have long been considered a kind of hero by many for defying authority; their punishment's often been viewed as unfair, and their suffering under it a kind of martyrdom. We finally accommodated their moral system in our laws.)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Paris knife attack: Two k...