UPDATED Pence Office Pushes Back: 'The Vice President Puts His Name on His Op-Eds'
Last edited Thu Sep 6, 2018, 09:35 AM - Edit history (1)
Source: Mediate
by Ken Meyer | Sep 6th, 2018, 8:12 am
The communications director for Mike Pence is making a point of denying that the vice president is behind the anonymous New York Times op-ed denouncing Donald Trumps chaotic tendencies.
As people continue to guess the identity of the unknown Senior Trump Official, some political observers have looked at the evidence and convinced themselves that it may very well be Pence. However, Pence senior staffer Jarrod Agen is saying that idea is completely preposterous.
Link to tweet
The anonymously-written op-ed caused a major firestorm because of what it describes about inner White House forces working to undermine and restrain the president before his amorality and conduct damages the country. This comes amid the intrigue over Bob Woodwards new bombshell-filled book, which suggested Trumps team is frantically working to stop him from taking the country into a nosedive.
###
Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/online/pence-office-pushes-back-the-vice-president-puts-his-name-on-his-op-eds/
UPDATE:
Pence, Pompeo deny they wrote anonymous op-ed slamming Trump
By CAITLIN OPRYSKO 09/06/2018 08:43 AM EDT
Vice President Mike Pence and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo are publicly denying that they are the author of an anonymous New York Times op-ed detailing a "resistance" movement inside the Trump administration, in an extraordinary demonstration of how the editorial has rattled the highest levels of government.
The editorial which was published on Wednesday from a senior official in the Trump administration and accuses the president of acting in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic" has kicked off a wild guessing game inside the White House and out about the authors identity.
In the hours after the remarkable rebuke of the president by one of his own, parts of the internet, searching for any clues as to who could have written the piece, latched on to the use of one word in particular: lodestar.
Some pointed out that Pence had used the fairly uncommon word in at least two speeches he delivered in 2017. But in a tweet condemning the column as gutless, Pences office denied that he wrote it, charging that The Vice President puts his name on his Op-Eds.
more
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/06/nyt-op-ed-pence-pompeo-809125
cstanleytech
(26,306 posts)central scrutinizer
(11,659 posts)This is right out of the Rove playbook: when theyre explaining, theyre losing.
Maxheader
(4,373 posts)The louder the denial....
Course the rightys don't pick up on that...
LonePirate
(13,428 posts)This denial rings hollow.
Botany
(70,551 posts)It was Pence.
emulatorloo
(44,164 posts)JMHO of course.
Botany
(70,551 posts)n/t
Mosby
(16,332 posts)His chief of staff.
Cosmocat
(14,567 posts)He is too smart/conniving to do it.
Whoever wrote that letter will have no future as an elected republican, and that goes double for Pence as the VP, the person next in line, will be taken as doing it for his own personal motives, generally, and more specifically for the lunatics in his voting block, purported "evangelicals" who have more loyalty to Trump than any other politician in our history.
His best shot at the Oval Office is keeping his head down, and let nature take its course and slide in as the supposed "good guy" who stayed about the shit show.
brooklynite
(94,670 posts)If (when) the OP writer's name is revealed, his public persona in the WH will be evaluated. A suck-up like Pence secretly working to undermine the President would be seen as devious rather than patriotic.
Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)n/t
brooklynite
(94,670 posts)Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)Pence is NO secret agent. He's a bit of a dumbass like everyone else in Shithole's admin.
haele
(12,665 posts)He's the type of slime that knows everyone in the Administration uses phrasing from the same book the more successful televangelicals use, and could easily write up something to not only take the news cycle off Republican Senators looking piss-poor against the Democratic block, but can get rid of those few high level staff "roadblocks" that keep him and his fellow Nazis from just "doing it" and completely taking over the Administration using Trump as a populist battering ram while they still can.
Bannon could do it, too. He thrives on "disruptive innovation" - of burning the establishment down to rebuild something more to their liking.
Hannity - naah. That bastard is smarmy enough to have written it, but is too stupid to actually time it well enough it could give Kavanaugh some breathing room, take attention off a rare show of political aggression by the Democrats that actually might help them, and cause Trump to re-stack his staff with less "thoughtful" staff members who would be willing to just blow things up and damn the consequences.
Haele
It does not even read like him, at all - he is disciplined right wing talking points machine.
People are latching on to Lodestar, but nothing else fits at all.
Pence is no such thing. He's stupid enough to give himself away.
sure ...
It's him.
Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)you're the smart ass around here.
Cosmocat
(14,567 posts)but, I fail to see how not arguing with someone further is being a smart ass.
You want to believe what you want to believe, so be it.
Liberalagogo
(1,770 posts)Thanks for proving my point, and welcome to ignore.
SWBTATTReg
(22,156 posts)article...we're giving Pence way too much intelligence...why do you think rump picked him? A toady, that's why and that is all Pence it, a toady.
djacq
(1,634 posts)Agent Lodestar.
machoneman
(4,007 posts)I'll venture that 2-3 staffers or even Cabinet members (or a mix) drafted the op-ed but had only one come forward to give it to the Times.
PubliusEnigma
(1,583 posts)elmac
(4,642 posts)this seems like something they would come up with to stir things up. Nice to see what goes around comes around.
AndJusticeForSome
(537 posts)...not because of *who* said it. (That part not in OP quote).
But thinking about it, there may have been good reason for it being anonymous, at least for a day or so, so that the "firestorm" is focused on the content rather than the author.
Although much of the focus was on the mystery of "who?", If the source had been identified, the focus may have really been off the content, and onto the author.
truthisfreedom
(23,151 posts)Solly Mack
(90,778 posts)lolol
King_Klonopin
(1,306 posts)If you think in terms of organized crime (i.e. gangsters) he stands
to gain the most if Trump if removed from office. If he is trying to
overthrow the current Don of this cabal, he is setting it into motion.
He gets to be POTUS without being voted into office - nice deal.
Like any gangster, he sees his chance. Once in office, he has 2 years
to sway the Rep base that he is a hero.
Pence is a creepy weasel of a man. His fawning posturing around the Boss
is ingratiating. Keep your friends close, but keep your enemies closer.
Reason number 2: if anyone is capable of acting out fantasies that can
be described as "savior complex" or messianic self-image, this guy is the
one. He can claim that he and a few colleagues saved the nation from ruin
after the dust settles. There is obvious self-righteousness woven into that
op-ed letter. Every time I watch this story being covered on cable news,
the only person I see in my minds-eye is Pence, Pence, Pence.
This is what happens when your government is taken over by antisocial,
psychopathological miscreants.
Pence is my first guess. Mattis is my second choice. Whoever it is, this admin.
is beyond the point of dysfunctional and cowardly. Psychotic?
DeminPennswoods
(15,289 posts)as an indicator of who is likely the source(s). Pence and Pompeo were at the top of my suspect list, and, bingo, they are also the first and loudest to say "not me".