Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mia

(8,361 posts)
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:06 AM Sep 2012

BLM declares Burning Man Second Amendment-free zone

Source: Examiner.com

The Bureau of Land Management has declared the Burning Man “radical self-expression/self-reliance" community “experiment” in northern Nevada’s Black Rock Desert a temporary weapons-free zone, GunLeaders Blog reported today. Citing a Department of the Interior “Notice of Temporary Closure and Temporary Restrictions of Specific Uses on Public Lands in Pershing County, NV” appearing in the Federal Register Volume 77, Number 157 (Tuesday, August 14, 2012), the edict mandates “temporary closures and temporary restrictions will be in effect from August 13, 2012 to September 17, 2012.

Proclaiming its authority under 43 CFR 8364.1., and issued by Gene Seidlitz, District Manager, Winnemucca District, the restriction notice declared “The possession of any weapon is prohibited except weapons within motor vehicles passing through the public closure area, without stopping, on the west or east playa roads.

“The prohibitions above shall not apply to county, state, tribal, and Federal law enforcement personnel, or any person authorized by Federal law to possess a weapon," the notice continued. "‘Art projects' that include weapons and are sanctioned by BRC LLC will be permitted after obtaining authorization from the BLM authorized officer.”

“Any person who violates the above rules and restrictions may be tried before a United States Magistrate and fined no more than $1,000, imprisoned for no more than 12 months, or both,” the notice warned, adding “Such violations may also be subject to the enhanced fines provided for at 18 U.S.C. 3571.”



Read more: http://www.examiner.com/article/blm-declares-burning-man-second-amendment-free-zone



[link:http://www.examiner.com/article/blm-declares-burning-man-second-amendment-free-zone|
36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
BLM declares Burning Man Second Amendment-free zone (Original Post) mia Sep 2012 OP
Shouldn't the Constitution be the supreme law of all the land? alp227 Sep 2012 #1
Someone is mixing-up rights with privileges appal_jack Sep 2012 #6
Because a privilege has been granted... jberryhill Sep 2012 #16
I disagree. appal_jack Sep 2012 #25
You don't understand - the area has been essentially rented out jberryhill Sep 2012 #34
We don't allow prisoners to have guns. ZombieHorde Sep 2012 #30
So, allow guns at wild, drunken, parties, where people are not in their right minds? boppers Sep 2012 #18
We already ban guns for most people in some places, such as White House tours and airplanes. ZombieHorde Sep 2012 #29
Makes sense - what with recent reports about target shooting sparking fires and all... petronius Sep 2012 #2
I thought it was the middle of a dry lake bed....? PavePusher Sep 2012 #9
It is, I was just trying to make a joke on the 'burning' aspect petronius Sep 2012 #28
Naw, that was my caffein-deficiency at work. Well played! n/t PavePusher Sep 2012 #35
I doubt many burners would want to push this DBoon Sep 2012 #3
Why would you need a gun at a peaceful event ? Grassy Knoll Sep 2012 #4
in case of an armed intruder? alp227 Sep 2012 #7
That would be the genius with the gun. aquart Sep 2012 #12
Such a recurring problem at Burning Man oh wait. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2012 #15
Intruder? boppers Sep 2012 #19
It's not limited to that alone, though. Occulus Sep 2012 #11
There is no imaginable need for a gun at that place The_Casual_Observer Sep 2012 #5
When my son is old enough, I'm going to take him there. AtheistCrusader Sep 2012 #10
You want to take guns to church? aquart Sep 2012 #13
Well no. AtheistCrusader Sep 2012 #14
What's the problem? PavePusher Sep 2012 #36
A co-worker of mine goes every year and is very active in the SF Area Burning Man community lunatica Sep 2012 #8
Yeah, I have a son that wants to take me. bemildred Sep 2012 #21
If you like genuinely creative people you'll enjoy it lunatica Sep 2012 #22
I like crazy people. bemildred Sep 2012 #27
I'd love to put together a little theater a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #31
There you go, we don't do enough with blimps. nt bemildred Sep 2012 #32
Maybe... a geek named Bob Sep 2012 #33
In the early days of Burning Man it was common to see participants carrying firearms slackmaster Sep 2012 #24
Not sure that guns and peyote buttons are such a great mix. leveymg Sep 2012 #17
Good. nt bemildred Sep 2012 #20
This rule will help increase gun sales. Festivito Sep 2012 #23
This is redundant. The festival rules have prohibited firearms for many years. slackmaster Sep 2012 #26
 

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)
6. Someone is mixing-up rights with privileges
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:28 AM
Sep 2012

Someone is mixing-up rights with priileges.

If it can be revoked, even temporarily, it is a privilege.

However, rights > privileges.

The Constitution has a Bill of RIGHTS, iirc.

I fully support arresting and fining (or imprisoning, if necessary), people who commit crimes with guns at Burning Man, particularly violent crimes. But making gun possession a crime is unwarranted. Why is the BLM free to reoke the Second Amendment at its whim?

_app

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
16. Because a privilege has been granted...
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 02:47 AM
Sep 2012

...in permitting, in an environmentally sensitive area, a large gathering of people, vehicles, and unusual behavior involving alcohol, drugs, fireworks, and a tremendous bonfire.

Any other time, you can go out there with your gun, and that is your right. However, in the context of an event which is not a right, but subject to exacting conditions on impact to the land, then we are operating under a different set of right/privilege conditions.

 

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)
25. I disagree.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 11:20 AM
Sep 2012

The very nature of a codified right is that the government shold have no power to revoke it. This whole Hollywood police state notion of 'we are suspending the Constitution' is bullshit.

-app

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
34. You don't understand - the area has been essentially rented out
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 02:17 PM
Sep 2012

The playa is closed to the general public.

It's been permitted to the exclusive use of a private group.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
30. We don't allow prisoners to have guns.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 01:02 PM
Sep 2012

We don't allow people taking White House tours to have guns. We don't allow people on airplanes to have guns.

By your definition (which isn't a bad one), guns are a privilege in the US.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
18. So, allow guns at wild, drunken, parties, where people are not in their right minds?
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 03:52 AM
Sep 2012

Have you been to a burn?

Or do you just frequent parties like that, where guns aren't taboo?

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
29. We already ban guns for most people in some places, such as White House tours and airplanes.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:58 PM
Sep 2012

Banning guns in certain areas seems pretty normal in the US.

petronius

(26,602 posts)
28. It is, I was just trying to make a joke on the 'burning' aspect
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:54 PM
Sep 2012

Probably funnier before I typed it...

DBoon

(22,366 posts)
3. I doubt many burners would want to push this
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:23 AM
Sep 2012

even the ones who own.

Burning Man attracts a much different crowd than a typical gun show. Burners respect the culture and rule of the event, regardless of what they might do elsewhere.

You don't want to follow the rules, you can participate in a different event.

boppers

(16,588 posts)
19. Intruder?
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 04:06 AM
Sep 2012

It's not private land.

That being said, burners build massive flamethrowers, that they mount on desert capable tanks, for *fun*.

A handgun is just asking for a public beat down.

Occulus

(20,599 posts)
11. It's not limited to that alone, though.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 01:30 AM
Sep 2012

It seems to apply to out-of-state persons traveling through the area who stop to take a picture. Note the "without stopping" part. Effectively, they're saying "if you stop, your rights end here".


Nope.


Could anyone tell me if there would be a money award for a successful test of this? It seems like a slam dunk and I need the cash...

half

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
10. When my son is old enough, I'm going to take him there.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 01:03 AM
Sep 2012

To be honest, I normally carry, but all I need is for the organizers to say 'please, no guns', and I would respect their wishes.

That said, it's an event somewhat at risk from some right wing nutjob.

Two killed, 7 injured:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knoxville_Unitarian_Universalist_church_shooting

Why any asshole came up with a reason to attack these peaceful, wonderful people, I cannot imagine, but there it is. It can happen.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Norway_attacks
Unless you might have police there, to watch over it, there's always a chance some scumbag is going to show up and hurt good people. Having the tools to respond isn't necessarily a bad idea.

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
14. Well no.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 02:41 AM
Sep 2012

I don't 'do' church.

No curious child would ever be capable of obtaining my firearm though. I elect carry options that preclude such negligence.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
8. A co-worker of mine goes every year and is very active in the SF Area Burning Man community
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 12:32 AM
Sep 2012

I can't imagine her thinking of it as a place for guns.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
21. Yeah, I have a son that wants to take me.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 10:12 AM
Sep 2012

I'm not sure I can handle it, but it sounds like fun to try.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
22. If you like genuinely creative people you'll enjoy it
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 10:46 AM
Sep 2012

Everyone I know who has gone are interesting, creative and somewhat geeky people.

 

a geek named Bob

(2,715 posts)
31. I'd love to put together a little theater
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 01:29 PM
Sep 2012

For Burning man...

Fly a solar powered blimp to Burning Man. On landing, use the blimp itself as a massive sun shade, and the propellers as wind generators...

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
24. In the early days of Burning Man it was common to see participants carrying firearms
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 11:08 AM
Sep 2012

Dozens of people have been injured and even killed at Burning Man, but never by gunshot.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
17. Not sure that guns and peyote buttons are such a great mix.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 03:03 AM
Sep 2012

. . . Hunter Thompson is the exception that may prove the rule.

Festivito

(13,452 posts)
23. This rule will help increase gun sales.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 10:59 AM
Sep 2012

And, not even one reason why, just a non-discriptive comment from opponents to this government opposition to guns.


"Actions by a few participants at previous events have resulted in law enforcement and public safety incidents similar to those observed in urban areas of similar-size populations,”

My guess, this is done by a Republican plant. We won't get his/her name. Knee-jerks will knee-jerk blame lee-bruls and Obama while guns sales will go up.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»BLM declares Burning Man ...