Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,545 posts)
Tue Sep 18, 2018, 11:51 PM Sep 2018

Los Angeles takes step toward banning sale of fur products

Source: Associated Press


By ASSOCIATED PRESS
SEP 18, 2018 | 7:20 PM

Los Angeles, one of the world's major fashion centers and long a symbol of glitz and glamour, is taking steps to ban the sale of new fur products, a move that would make it the largest city in the U.S. to do so.

A proposal to ban the sale of fur products advanced in the City Council on Tuesday. The council voted unanimously to direct the city attorney to draft an ordinance that will prohibit the manufacture and sale of new fur products. The ordinance must be presented to the council at a future date for final approval.

“This is something that is not just a good legislative win, it's a moral win,” Councilman Bob Blumenfield said. “We feel like we're evolving as a city, as people, to stop this kind of unnecessary cruelty.”

The vote also directed the city attorney to report back to the council on several issues, including how fur apparel is utilized by religious organizations, and possible exemptions, as well as potential conflicts with federal and state laws relating to sale of fur products derived from legally trapped animals.


Read more: http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-fur-ban-20180918-story.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Los Angeles takes step toward banning sale of fur products (Original Post) Judi Lynn Sep 2018 OP
Seeing as fur is not illegal under the Constitution is this likely to be thrown out as overreach by cstanleytech Sep 2018 #1
Doubtful. Maven Sep 2018 #2
Good... Raine Sep 2018 #3
Wonderful. Torturing animals for vanity is no different than torturing them for pleasure. MLAA Sep 2018 #4
Or for dinner. Codeine Sep 2018 #5
Amen. Thank you for posting. I quit eating all animal products about 5 years ago MLAA Sep 2018 #6
Good! Bayard Sep 2018 #7
Next: leather? nt JustABozoOnThisBus Sep 2018 #8

cstanleytech

(26,299 posts)
1. Seeing as fur is not illegal under the Constitution is this likely to be thrown out as overreach by
Wed Sep 19, 2018, 12:16 AM
Sep 2018

LA as far as trying to ban the selling of fur?

Maven

(10,533 posts)
2. Doubtful.
Wed Sep 19, 2018, 01:52 AM
Sep 2018

There is no Constitutional right to buy or sell fur; it is a form of commerce that can be regulated or even prohibited — much like, say, the buying and selling of cannabis.

Just because the Constitution does not expressly prohibit something does not, on its own, mean that you have an affirmative right to do it.

MLAA

(17,299 posts)
6. Amen. Thank you for posting. I quit eating all animal products about 5 years ago
Wed Sep 19, 2018, 07:07 AM
Sep 2018

went vegetarian about 10 years ago, then realized eating eggs and cheese also contributed to torturing animals.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Los Angeles takes step to...