Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
Thu Sep 27, 2018, 08:34 PM Sep 2018

California man is "genuinely remorseful" for role in 2016 election interference

Source: CBS News

The man who sold the personal banking information of Americans to the Russian nationals indicted for interfering in the 2016 U.S. elections pleaded guilty to one count of identity fraud in connection with special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation. Richard Pinedo, a California native, will be sentenced in federal court in Washington, D.C. on October 10th. He faces 12-18 months imprisonment according to the guidelines.

A sentencing memo filed Wednesday night indicated prosecutors for the special counsel have no opinion about what his sentence should be. The memo can be read here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/17K-OOvpDnZguGQojkWaKTOB1l3QrLAml/preview



Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-man-richard-pinedo-is-genuinely-remorseful-for-role-in-2016-election-interference/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California man is "genuinely remorseful" for role in 2016 election interference (Original Post) JonLP24 Sep 2018 OP
Fascinating! BadGimp Sep 2018 #1
He's probably only genuinely remorseful that he got caught. ancianita Sep 2018 #2
Yeah, your remorse does us a lot of good, fuckhead... Aristus Sep 2018 #3
This guy usually doesn't get counted in Mueller's tally of convictions. Wonder why? n/t Julian Englis Sep 2018 #4
didn't read the article but maybe because he wasn't knowingly involved JI7 Sep 2018 #5

JI7

(89,250 posts)
5. didn't read the article but maybe because he wasn't knowingly involved
Fri Sep 28, 2018, 05:40 AM
Sep 2018

with the larger plan of affecting the election.

it was more of them finding a guy they could bribe at the moment to give up something he had access to in exchange for money.

but i haven't read the article or other details so i could be wrong about that.

either way he should still be considered as one of the convictions. he still knowingly did something illegal .

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»California man is "genuin...