Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,542 posts)
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 05:20 PM Oct 2018

Ruling strikes down parts of St. Louis 'abortion ordinance'

Source: Associated Press


Jim Salter, Associated Press Updated 3:57 pm CDT, Thursday, October 4, 2018

ST. LOUIS (AP) — A federal judge has ruled that some provisions of a St. Louis ordinance banning discrimination based on reproductive health decisions violate the U.S. Constitution and Missouri law.

A lawsuit questioned the city's 2017 ordinance that bars employers from hiring or firing workers based on whether they have had an abortion, been pregnant outside marriage, or used contraceptives or artificial insemination. Landlords also can't refuse tenants based on those criteria.

Judge Audrey Fleissig's ruling said the ordinance violated the First Amendment rights of Catholic elementary schools and Our Lady's Inn, a home for pregnant homeless women, by requiring them to employ or house people who are not abortion opponents. She ruled that a provision requiring O'Brien Industrial Holdings LLC, a company operated by a devout Catholic, to offer health care covering abortion and contraception violated Missouri law.

But the judge's order stopped short of declaring the ordinance unconstitutional. Fleissig wrote that it remains valid for organizations that "hold no contrary expressive or religious beliefs." The ruling, issued Sunday, offered no explanation of how the city should draw that distinction.

Read more: https://www.chron.com/news/us/article/Ruling-strikes-down-parts-of-St-Louis-abortion-13281693.php

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ruling strikes down parts of St. Louis 'abortion ordinance' (Original Post) Judi Lynn Oct 2018 OP
good gopiscrap Oct 2018 #1
Some times I think throwing the "Christians" to the lions... malthaussen Oct 2018 #2
Me too SoCalNative Oct 2018 #3
It's a slippery slope down the chute of Personal Belief about everything bucolic_frolic Oct 2018 #4
Marital status and number of children should not be application nor interview questions. forgotmylogin Oct 2018 #5
And a Catholic SCOTUS gets to decide whose beliefs out weigh everyone else's. sinkingfeeling Oct 2018 #6
How is this good? AZ8theist Oct 2018 #7

bucolic_frolic

(43,173 posts)
4. It's a slippery slope down the chute of Personal Belief about everything
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 05:45 PM
Oct 2018

anyone can say just about anything is a personally held religious belief. If you lobby enough or sue enough you'll get your day your way. And we can all disobey everything, all laws, totally a matter of conscience.

forgotmylogin

(7,529 posts)
5. Marital status and number of children should not be application nor interview questions.
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 07:31 PM
Oct 2018

As well as credit checking applicants - I've never understood that. You have bills to pay, that's why you need a job.

AZ8theist

(5,470 posts)
7. How is this good?
Fri Oct 5, 2018, 09:42 AM
Oct 2018

The judge struck down parts of the ordinance that PREVENTED discrimination based on reproductive decisions. She basically said the Catholics are free to discriminate if you take birth control. This was a bad decision. Just wait, with KavaNOPE on the SC, the wing nuts will overturn Griswold v. Connecticut. Forget Roe v. Wade, thats a lost cause.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ruling strikes down parts...