Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,602 posts)
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:03 PM Oct 2018

Kavanaugh: I said things I 'should not have said' during Senate testimony

Source: Washington Post

Judge Brett Kavanaugh has admitted to saying some things he should not have during a Senate hearing last week, a tacit acknowledgement of the questions being raised about his conduct and emotions as he seeks confirmation to the Supreme Court.

Kavanaugh made the remarks in a column for the Wall Street Journal, arguing that he would be an independent and nonpartisan judge. But he did not apologize for his behavior at the hearing, in which he interrupted senators, turned questions about drinking back on them and seeded his opening remarks with comments about “revenge on behalf of the Clintons” and left-wing groups.

His performance has come under increased scrutiny as his potential appointment to the Supreme Court hangs in a delicate balance.

More than 2,400 law professors from across the political spectrum signed a letter this week arguing that the lack of “judicial temperament” that Kavanaugh displayed would be disqualifying for any court, let alone the highest in the land. A former Supreme Court justice, John Paul Stevens, has also weighed in, calling Kavanaugh’s hearing performance disqualifying during an event Thursday, according to the Palm Beach Post.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/10/05/kavanaugh-i-said-things-i-should-not-have-said-during-senate-testimony/?utm_term=.cbc062003a74

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kavanaugh: I said things I 'should not have said' during Senate testimony (Original Post) brooklynite Oct 2018 OP
Bad judgement -- bad judge Blue Owl Oct 2018 #1
Yeah. Like none of it. WhiteTara Oct 2018 #2
Left unsaid: "I drank things I should not have drank, I assaulted women I should not have assaulted" RockRaven Oct 2018 #3
I am glad he said those things because he made it perfectly clear how unfit he is for a job cstanleytech Oct 2018 #4
What he should have said was Jarqui Oct 2018 #5
Would these be his PREPARED remarks? DeminPennswoods Oct 2018 #6
Exactly. This was a CALCULATED performance. SunSeeker Oct 2018 #16
So right! True Blue American Oct 2018 #20
Why this today, because news of the phoney investigation, appalachiablue Oct 2018 #7
Yes. Curious timing They_Live Oct 2018 #10
The best judicial temperament ever dalton99a Oct 2018 #8
And the backpedal begins... Mr.Bill Oct 2018 #9
He is too hysterical ellie Oct 2018 #11
He's not capable to judge a pie-eating contest at the county fair. Dave Starsky Oct 2018 #27
Judge Kavanaugh, you can't "take back" a Supreme Court decision affecting millions of lives. Midnight Writer Oct 2018 #12
When he says... Whiskeytide Oct 2018 #13
Fuck this douchebro asshole. Fuck him and his second chance entitlement. FreepFryer Oct 2018 #14
How did he make it this far? He isn't even poised Glimmer of Hope Oct 2018 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author geralmar Oct 2018 #17
EXACTLY!!!!! NT bonniebgood Oct 2018 #25
No self control. Entitled whiny chickenshit bully. mahina Oct 2018 #18
Umm... what things, exactly, Brett? HMM? truthisfreedom Oct 2018 #19
And the 30%ers opinion? Maxheader Oct 2018 #21
And he wanted to testify "THE NEXT DAY" as Matt Damon parodied.......LOL Trust Buster Oct 2018 #22
The first thing he should not have said: "The Surpreme Court? Sure, why not?" marble falls Oct 2018 #23
I agree w/ the thousands of those professors that such a partisan person is not a fair or ... SWBTATTReg Oct 2018 #24
Yeah, booze will do that to you, cupcake. Dave Starsky Oct 2018 #26
GOD DAMN IT THAT'S CALLED "LYING!" Blue_Tires Oct 2018 #28
Forget the saying, it was the DOING Zambero Oct 2018 #29
Character only reveals itself under pressure... BlueIdaho Oct 2018 #30
If I "said things I should not have said" at work, I would be fired. Lack of professional demeanor. haele Oct 2018 #31
I like Beer. Lifting with Squi. sarcasmo Oct 2018 #32

RockRaven

(14,974 posts)
3. Left unsaid: "I drank things I should not have drank, I assaulted women I should not have assaulted"
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:06 PM
Oct 2018

"I boofed people I should not have boofed..." etc.

cstanleytech

(26,299 posts)
4. I am glad he said those things because he made it perfectly clear how unfit he is for a job
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:06 PM
Oct 2018

that is as important as SCOTUS is.

Jarqui

(10,126 posts)
5. What he should have said was
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:07 PM
Oct 2018

that he wanted a full, open and thorough investigation of these allegations by the FBI.

Any respectable justice with nothing to hide would call for that because they would not fear the outcome.

It is the proper due process for such a circumstance - try to get to the bottom of the truth.

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
6. Would these be his PREPARED remarks?
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:10 PM
Oct 2018

The ones he had time to think about and re-read before hitting send to his mouth? Would this be the pre-prepared attitude he came to his testimony with? The one he was determined to showcase to every Dem senator who dared ask him a question?

SunSeeker

(51,574 posts)
16. Exactly. This was a CALCULATED performance.
Fri Oct 5, 2018, 01:41 AM
Oct 2018

Now he realizes it backfired.


Sorry, Kav, no backsies. You gave us your true self. You can't take it back. You can't unring the bell.

appalachiablue

(41,146 posts)
7. Why this today, because news of the phoney investigation,
Thu Oct 4, 2018, 11:14 PM
Oct 2018

demonstrations, many withdrawing support, Justice Steven's remarks today that he's not suitable, concern about the vote.

Otherwise why not write this explanation, non apology earlier this week or last week?

Dave Starsky

(5,914 posts)
27. He's not capable to judge a pie-eating contest at the county fair.
Fri Oct 5, 2018, 09:56 AM
Oct 2018

He would probably pass out in the chocolate cream.

Whiskeytide

(4,461 posts)
13. When he says...
Fri Oct 5, 2018, 12:23 AM
Oct 2018

... “some things I should not have said” he means he revealed some things he wishes he had not revealed.

FreepFryer

(7,077 posts)
14. Fuck this douchebro asshole. Fuck him and his second chance entitlement.
Fri Oct 5, 2018, 12:36 AM
Oct 2018

That op-ed makes him look terrible. Good for him.

Response to brooklynite (Original post)

SWBTATTReg

(22,143 posts)
24. I agree w/ the thousands of those professors that such a partisan person is not a fair or ...
Fri Oct 5, 2018, 08:46 AM
Oct 2018

balanced pick for the highest court in the land.

By nominating BK, rump did BK and the country a great disservice, in that rump is thinking that BK could be a potential backstop against impeachment or other such actions against rump. What other qualifications did BK have if he was already so partisan and emotional already? Why were so many documents withheld during the discovery phase that were requested on BK? Why such a weak FBI investigation into the BK allegations?

One does tend to believe that this whole process is a total sham, no less.

We all saw BK's actions live on TV and how partisan it was. How very partisan it was as a matter of fact. Blatantly so. Voters saw thru this. Voters also saw not BK in a more favorable light, but the victims in a more favorable light. There seems to be some talk of repugs picking up minor % points in the polls because of 'the attacks on BK' but this is wrong, it's the attacks on women and not believing them that's causing the polls to move, and move favorable towards the democrats.

Zambero

(8,964 posts)
29. Forget the saying, it was the DOING
Fri Oct 5, 2018, 10:02 AM
Oct 2018

What you said merely confirmed your unfitness to serve on the Supreme Court.

BlueIdaho

(13,582 posts)
30. Character only reveals itself under pressure...
Fri Oct 5, 2018, 10:12 AM
Oct 2018

We finally got to see the real Barfing Brett. He is one ugly son of a bitch.

haele

(12,660 posts)
31. If I "said things I should not have said" at work, I would be fired. Lack of professional demeanor.
Fri Oct 5, 2018, 10:39 AM
Oct 2018

Simply put, if he can't get it together enough to not approach a couple hours of Congressional Hearing like a stereotypical South-side dockworker might approaches a sports discussion at the corner bar after a couple drinks before staggering home to a cooling dinner, he's not mentally competent enough to be making a determination on the legal complexities of Constitutional Law for the Nation.

My apologies to the stereotypical South-side dockworkers that reside in any number of coastal cities.

Haele

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Kavanaugh: I said things ...