Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,585 posts)
Fri Oct 26, 2018, 07:09 AM Oct 2018

Dems hold active discussions on 2020 debates

Source: The Hill

The Democratic National Committee is undergoing a series of internal and external discussions on how to handle primary debates during the 2020 presidential election, according to sources familiar with the conversations.

The sources say the discussions — which have been taking place for several months and are being led by interim DNC CEO Mary Beth Cahill and a small group of party officials — include how early in the cycle the debates should begin as well as how many debates the party should have, two main sticking points from the 2016 cycle.

DNC officials are also faced with how to handle the number of expected candidates and their criteria for being included in the debates. Some believe as many as 30 Democrats may run for president in 2020.

The officials are looking at how the Republican National Committee handled the 17 primary candidates who ran for that nomination in 2016, according to sources familiar with the conversations.

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/413163-dems-hold-active-discussions-on-2020-debates

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dems hold active discussions on 2020 debates (Original Post) brooklynite Oct 2018 OP
Screw The Hill, watoos Oct 2018 #1
Wow, it really IS "just around the corner". 7962 Oct 2018 #2
Just saw the OP, and knew exactly this had to be from either The Hill or Politico still_one Oct 2018 #3
Yeah name 30 national democrats zipplewrath Oct 2018 #4
Absolutely right on still_one Oct 2018 #6
Well, the Wash Post has published a couple articles on as many as 15 7962 Oct 2018 #5
 

watoos

(7,142 posts)
1. Screw The Hill,
Fri Oct 26, 2018, 07:20 AM
Oct 2018

Talking about 2020 is a big distraction is meaningless. Vote Vote Vote on November 6th 2018, after that we can talk about 2020.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
2. Wow, it really IS "just around the corner".
Fri Oct 26, 2018, 07:23 AM
Oct 2018

It'll be '19 soon and then everyone is going to come out of the woodwork

still_one

(92,209 posts)
3. Just saw the OP, and knew exactly this had to be from either The Hill or Politico
Fri Oct 26, 2018, 07:29 AM
Oct 2018

We are only a few days before the midterms, and they are pushing the idea of 30 Democratic candidates


Bullshit. The Hill wishes there would be 30 candidates, and we wouldn't think about the midterms


There will be no more than 5 candidates, and that will filter out to 2 to 3 candidates relatively quickly






zipplewrath

(16,646 posts)
4. Yeah name 30 national democrats
Fri Oct 26, 2018, 07:54 AM
Oct 2018

When I saw 30 my first thought was "name 'em". It might be more than 5, but it gets hard to drum up financing for 30. 15 is about the upper limit.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
5. Well, the Wash Post has published a couple articles on as many as 15
Fri Oct 26, 2018, 08:30 AM
Oct 2018

Even ranking them. As have several other large publications. Just google it. I dont know why its hard to believe that a TON of people would love to run against trump

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Dems hold active discussi...