Top Bernie Sanders 2016 adviser accused of forcibly kissing subordinate
Source: Politico
On the final night of the Democratic National Convention in July of 2016, Bernie Sanders staffers went out to a Mediterranean restaurant and hookah bar in Center City Philadelphia to celebrate and mourn the end of the campaign.
Sitting at the bar sometime after midnight, convention floor leader Robert Beckerwho oversaw Sanders Iowa campaign, then helped lead his efforts in Michigan, California, and New York as deputy national field directorbegan talking with a female staffer who had worked under him along with her boyfriend.
Becker, now 50 years old, told the 20-something woman that he had always wanted to have sex with her and made a reference to riding his pole, according to the woman and three other people who witnessed what happened or were told about it shortly afterward by people who did. Later in the night, Becker approached the woman and abruptly grabbed her wrists. Then he moved his hands to her head and forcibly kissed her, putting his tongue in her mouth as he held her, the woman and other sources said.
The woman did not formally report the incident at the time because the campaign was over. But over the past several months, Becker, who is not on Sanders payroll, has been calling potential staffers and traveling to early primary states to prepare for another presidential runactivities that Sanders top aides did not endorse, but did not disavow, either.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/09/bernie-sanders-2016-robert-becker-women-inappropriate-behavior-1093836
dalton99a
(81,543 posts)LiberalFighter
(51,005 posts)Why do they think this is okay and can get away with it? There are certain boundaries that should not be crossed.
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)First Hillary Clinton staffers accused of sexual harassment.Then Kamala Harris staffers accused of sexual harassment and now Bernie's campaign. This is getting crazy. These candidates need to have better control over who is working for them! Enough is enough!!
StevieM
(10,500 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 12, 2019, 05:29 PM - Edit history (1)
It called for her to take direct responsibility for handling these situations if they were to arise.
When HRC found out about a much less severe situation, she immediately took action. The staffer hadn't forcibly kissed her, or asked her for sex, or pressured her. He didn't have the official power to hire or fire her. But he did place his hands on her shoulders and he did send her some suggestive, if not explicit, emails.
Hillary took action. She listened to the staffer. She believed her. She transferred her to a different position, one where she thrived and built her future career from. The offender was suspended for 5 weeks, demoted, had his salary cut and was ordered to go for sexual harassment counseling. Given the details of the story, it has to be said that HRC exceeded the standards of 2017.
Of course, that didn't stop the media from claiming that she "shielded" the offender, or that she "overrode" her campaign manager--as if the campaign manager, rather than the candidate is supposed to be the final authority. Can you imagine how people would have reacted if the campaign manager made the decision and Hillary said that she simply trusted her judgement and her right to make the call? People would have excoriated her for not taking personal responsibility for making the decision, or thinking it was important enough to get involved and be the one who made the call.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)When HRC found out about a much less severe situation, she immediately took action.
There are a lot of revelations and stories coming from the Bernie campaign recently... but it's a shame that none of them shock me. They upset me, of course, but I'm not shocked or surprised.
Heaven help us all.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)"I didn't sense much fun or [having sex] in Brooklyn," she deadpans.
A man thinks that unless "the kids are having sex" they're "not having fun." That might explain the attitude at campaigns run primarily by men for men.
Perhaps because the environment was safe for women, she hired a lot of women, and she attracted feminists to work on her campaign, there was less "having fun" in bed, and more fun with comradarie and mutual respect.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)JudyM
(29,251 posts)R B Garr
(16,964 posts)to muddy the waters to exonerate and excuse Sanders. He had pervasive problems in his campaign, starting at the top. He hasnt handled it well, as evidenced by the letter from former female staffers.
Lets not smear other female politicians to excuse one male Senator.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)R B Garr
(16,964 posts)Triangulation of the both sides smears. Its so obviously meant to deflect.
emulatorloo
(44,156 posts)TexasTowelie
(112,322 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Everybody's doing it!!!! So it's not really a problem when it's found to have been going on in my favorite Independent politician, even if it way different than what actually happened with all those DEMOCRATIC WOMEN politicians that we should be criticizing instead... over there!!!! They're ALL crazy!!
Don't expect people to get down there in the mud, now...
at140
(6,110 posts)to be attracted to others of their desirable sex partners. It is nature doing its work to keep the human race going. Most people can control their urges and behave themselves. A few cannot and they should be held accountable for their actions.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)It just seems that there are many, not a few, who don't choose to, and it turns out are protected and enabled by those around them who could have done something to stop it.
That attitude of downplaying repeated, predatory behavior as nothing more than "natural impulses of a very few" is what got Kavanaugh confirmed.
R B Garr
(16,964 posts)accusing others of wrongdoing and corruption. This is outrageous.
at140
(6,110 posts)at140
(6,110 posts)It said------->"A few cannot and they should be held accountable for their actions."
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Bernie's came right out with "I didn't know."
One of those who were involved said that Bernie has known for a long time - at least since 2017, when she and others told Sanders not to endorse Carmona.
The LA Times broke the story about Arturo Carmona and 2016 Sanders staffers story:
https://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-congressional-candidate-arturo-carmona-1491016048-htmlstory.html
Had Sanders come forward in March of 2017, and said, "The buck stops here," and apologized then you could compare his response to Kamala Harris.
And the situation with Kamala Harris was also very different, as you well know...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/longtime-aide-to-sen-kamala-d-harris-resigns-amid-sexual-harassment-allegations/2018/12/06/b748934c-f94b-11e8-8c9a-860ce2a8148f_story.html?utm_term=.4735534a91db
George II
(67,782 posts)BeckyDem
(8,361 posts)Every exposed story is a win, imo.
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)yurbud
(39,405 posts)napi21
(45,806 posts)anyone's campaign again! If they get together, they can probably hire an attorney to file the suit with lots of publicity. If they don't want to continue they can just drop it after the publicity does the job. Of course if they decide to go through with it, all the better. Maybe they can drag a few sheckles out of him.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)could receive? They are afraid of it already...
It just really sucks because no one ever held him accountable and he kept pushing and pushing and seeing how much he could get away with. This cant happen in 2020. You cant run for President of the United States unless you acknowledge that every campaign demands a safe work environment for every employee and volunteer.
The Sanders 2016 HR person has said that the women are lying to kneecap the 2020 campaign.
Would that be worth the "opportunity to make Becker pay a few shekels?"
Cha
(297,441 posts)Last edited Thu Jan 10, 2019, 03:00 AM - Edit history (1)
Becker continued making plans for 2020, however, and attracted press attention for a trip to South Carolina in mid-December to recruit campaign staffers for Sanders.
Candidates who allow people like Robert Becker to lead their organizations shouldn't earn the highest office in our government, said the woman, who was granted anonymity because she feared retaliation from supporters of Sanders and Becker, who has a loyal following of his own.
It just really sucks because no one ever held him accountable and he kept pushing and pushing and seeing how much he could get away with. This cant happen in 2020. You cant run for President of the United States unless you acknowledge that every campaign demands a safe work environment for every employee and volunteer.
This isn't the only woman who has reported sexual misconduct in this campaign.
emulatorloo
(44,156 posts)Jeff Weaver won't reprise role as Sanders campaign manager
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211648488
Cha
(297,441 posts)when I read this, emulatorloo.
Gothmog
(145,427 posts)SunSeeker
(51,607 posts)lunamagica
(9,967 posts)McKim
(2,412 posts)Interesting. I wonder where all this is coming from. Will there be more inside stories coming from other candidates campaigns? I believe women and I understand why she would not report it immediately. Many women never report. Still something doesnt smell right about this to me.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)did nothing. It smells exactly right to me.
yardwork
(61,678 posts)If you read the article, she told numerous people at the time that her boss sexually assaulted her. There were witnesses, too. She chose not to press charges at the time because the campaign ended that night.
She came forward publicly now because her former boss, the one who sexually assaulted her, recently contacted her. He has been traveling around the country launching a campaign for Bernie.
This survivor, and the others who are speaking up now, don't want the Bernie 2020 campaign to involve sexual assault by his top campaign directors.
Seems reasonable to me.
George II
(67,782 posts)....when he recently contacted her (among others) about his intentions of working in the 2020 campaign. That alarmed her. No doubt that concerned her, thinking that others in two years might be subjected to his abuse.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)and it has been a problem in many businesses. The relative short term nature, the real camaraderie, the hours and being away from home all probably make it more likely. One reason the me too movement was eye opening is that it showed that most women have to one degree or another faced this. As has been said - it needs to end. Looking at the internet, this guy seems to be a real character and he is defined on the Sanders 2016 website as someone who worked on campaigns for decades - http://www.p2016.org/sanders/sandersorg.html
As can be seen, he was the Iowa director for Bill Richardson's campaign. Before that he worked in Florida - in 2004 he was a Florida field director for ACT, in 2000, he ran the Polk County Bill Bradley primary campaign. It looks like he was one of junior or many second tier operatives who were hired by the Sanders campaign. That is not surprising - his first field director moved from his Senate staff.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Brazile wrote of HRC's campaign
"I didn't sense much fun or [having sex] in Brooklyn," she deadpans.
Apparently, Tony Coelho seemed to think that a campaign needed staffers in bed with each other in order to "have fun" and "win."
Perhaps because HRC created a safe work environment, hired many women and attracted feminists to her campaign, the "fun" didn't involve encouraging "the kids to have sex."
karynnj
(59,504 posts)could have had someone out in their field staff doing such things. I would agree that the candidate could set a tone that makes it more or less likely. Still, I would not feel comfortable ruling out anything wrong happened.
I would agree that Clinton's campaign, with the many women in leadership positions, might have had far less than other campaigns, but that same kind of tone could have been set for a male campaign. (In fact, I have seen no accusations for either the Obama's or Kerry's campaign -- though, as with the comment I made - I would not rule out that someone, in some state, in any campaign might have misbehaved.
PS I seriously doubt that many, if any, candidates explicitly encouraged the "kids" on their campaigns to have sex. Not even Bill Clinton.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)dealt with the 2008 incident to the satisfaction of those involved, who didn't feel a need to meet with her and her staff to prevent it from happening again.
No one has come forward with a complaint about ANY issues on HRC's 2016, not "far less" than other campaigns. And only one person, not several were at issue in the HRC 2008 campaign.
P.S I only said that Tony Poehlo said that people should be encouraged to have sex, and I don't know what campaigns he has worked on.
R B Garr
(16,964 posts)was abused like she was. Now the excuses are that other politicians and now businesses do the same things, so everyone just look away from Bernie.
The problem is that the behavior was very visible and we know where it came from. Now we see the behavior was also internalized in his campaign, so the pattern is evident.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Staffers from the 2016 campaign wanted a meeting with Sanders and staff to ensure that it wouldn't happen again. They didn't think that enough had been done to prevent it. They were not going to go public with it until the letter leaked.
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/12/30/bernie-sanders-campaign-harassment-1077014
This is not just one woman with a history of instability - it's men and women, some high level staff that called this meeting.
There is nothing that smells funny, except the entire situation that they are trying to prevent for future staffers.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Or hell, if the specifics are too difficult, what about 'in general' then?
Cha
(297,441 posts)with #Whataboutism.
Fuzzpope
(602 posts)Seriously, how do these assholes not realize forcing themselves on a woman is not going to end up with their ass in a sling.
Drunk or not, you'd think somebody would consider the extinction level event they're about to trigger can't possibly end well.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)had no obvious consequences - though I would imagine that for many who seemingly got away with it - did have it impact their reputation.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)that would be different.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)because of "Me Too." That should have changed both how the men might see what they are doing as not just wrong, but despicable AND they would have seen various people in entertainment and media with their reputations in tatters because they thought they were entitled to act like that.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Either in 2008 or 2016. She walked the walk.
So did her campaign committee - at her direction.
karynnj
(59,504 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Cha
(297,441 posts)betsuni
(25,576 posts)bluestarone
(17,002 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Maybe this is why he's not coming back as manager?
George II
(67,782 posts)If so, they didn't report his salary as an expenditure on their FEC filing.
And who paid the $30,000 settlement mentioned in the article? It appears that the campaign did, but these are the only $30,000 expenses reported to the FEC:
SPOKANE PUBLIC FACILITIES DISTRICT, EVENT SITE RENTAL
WATERMARK EVENT MANAGEMENT, SOUND/STAGE/LIGHTING
PEOPLE'S BANK, CREDIT CARD PAYMENT
HUBDIALER, TELEPHONE CALLS
LIVEVOX, INC., SOFTWARE
LIVEVOX, INC., SOFTWARE
WATERMARK EVENT MANAGEMENT, SOUND/STAGE/LIGHTING
BLUE WAVE POLITICAL PARTNERS LLC, CONSULTING/ACCOUNTING/COMPLIANCE
LIVEVOX, INC., SOFTWARE
LIVEVOX, INC., SOFTWARE
Despite the fact that a settlement was agreed to by the victim and the campaign, there still was a federal discrimination complaint. You can't cover that up.
R B Garr
(16,964 posts)Where is his salary?? How was the settlement paid! Great questions, George. Those FEC filings faced some heavy questioning, as I recall.....but hmm.
George II
(67,782 posts)There were literally hundreds of thousands of contributions flagged by the FEC as either impermissible or questionable, many from foreign sources.
The FEC is a treasure trove of information about campaigns, both Democratic and republican. One can learn quite a bit about campaigns just from the candidates' filings. When I was a treasurer of campaigns and committees several years ago, it seemed that I was researching something every quarter (they were state reports in those cases, not federal) We uncovered a few "Ahas!" about our opposition.
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Garvey, Schubert & Barer
$839,053
17 payments
That may be who cut the check, and handled the legal issues for the campaign.
Yet, still - I can't understand why or how the candidate was not advised of the reason for a 30k campaign expense, or that a federal discrimination complaint had been filed against the campaign by two staffers.
George II
(67,782 posts)Wasn't payments through a law firm or LLC something that got trump in trouble?
Here's another curious expenditure (off this topic), the campaign spent more than $600,000 with Amazon, $500,000+ with "Amazon HDQT".
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)I've worked a few places that utilize that.
the HDQT could be ad buys.
However, Tad Devine did all the ad buys via a two person company called Old Town Media, LLC
$220 million worth of ads.
No one has been able to determine who owns it.
George II
(67,782 posts)...Very little is known about OTM, which operates out of a private house in Alexandria, Virginia, Revolution Messaging is in Washington DC. It looks like it might be owned by a married couple, David and Shelli Hartig.
R B Garr
(16,964 posts)with ehrnst, and it looks to confirm some suspicions.
The connection with Tad Devine having worked with Paul Manafort also explains some campaign similarities.
This is a very interesting development!
Response to George II (Reply #32)
ehrnst This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to ehrnst (Reply #37)
George II This message was self-deleted by its author.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)Recommended.
Gothmog
(145,427 posts)sheshe2
(83,833 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Last edited Thu Jan 10, 2019, 03:41 PM - Edit history (1)
in a federal discrimination complaint by other staffers concerning Becker:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100211652213
emulatorloo
(44,156 posts)enid602
(8,629 posts)Well, at least it wasnt Bernie himself.