Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 Max makes emergency landing in Orlando
Source: Washington Post
A Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 Max 8 on its way to storage was forced to make an emergency landing shortly after departing Orlando on Tuesday afternoon.
Southwest Flight 8701 took off from Orlando International Airport at 2:50 p.m. and returned to the airport just before 3 p.m. after pilots reported an engine problem, federal aviation and airline officials said.
The aircraft was being ferried to an airport in southern California with no passengers aboard, officials said. All Boeing 737 Max aircraft have been grounded by the Federal Aviation Administration and are only allowed to fly in special circumstances, such as being transferred to a storage facility.
The Crew followed protocol and safely landed back at the airport. The flight was scheduled to fly to Southern California Logistics Airport in Victorville, Calif., for short-term storage, Southwest said in a statement. The Boeing 737 MAX 8 will be moved to our Orlando maintenance facility for a review.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/transportation/2019/03/26/southwest-airlines-boeing-max-makes-emergency-landing-orlando/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.19ba8418d49f#click=https://t.co/VxlHOz4wSe
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,799 posts)Chin music
(23,002 posts)to a russian company? Bc the problems above? Sounds like one of those private, no-translator meetings may have been an exchange on a flashdrive of malware. The russians are cleaning up.
paleotn
(17,938 posts)is Boeing's only serious competitor. For all Boeing's problems, no one in their right mind would fly Russian built airliners....except Russians who have little choice.
Chin music
(23,002 posts)VMA131Marine
(4,145 posts)madaboutharry
(40,216 posts)There will be people who refuse to get on them. I doubt that there will be future orders for this boondoggle.
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Flown to the scrapyard at Boeings expense and everyone reimbursed.
Boomer
(4,168 posts)Who would be willing to fly them to the scrapyard.
Hassler
(3,382 posts)Mr. Sparkle
(2,937 posts)into the system to fly safely back to the airport. It has nothing to do with the widespread mcas failure.
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,799 posts)I knew some pilots who did test and ferry flights for an airline - they flew the broken ones. But still, I wouldn't want to do even a ferry flight in a MAX until they figure out that MCAS problem.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)Let's make the Boeing 737 Max the official airline of the Republican party.
Thin out the herd a little.
DemoTex
(25,400 posts)On July 31, 1989, I had a flight control problem with a Boeing 737-400. I was flying a red-eye flight from San Francisco to Philly. We had about 180 seconds over Denver, at 2 AM, to figure the problem out. We did.
It was a Boeing design flaw in the electric rudder trim system. They stonewalled, at first. Then there was a fatal crash involving the same system, about two months laters (USAir 5050).
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,799 posts)And then there was USAir 427 in 1994, the 737 crash near Pittsburgh, where the rudder went full deflection because of a jammed valve in the rudder control system (and there had been previous similar incidents, including an unsolved accident). It took the NTSB more than four years to figure that one out because they had so much trouble duplicating the malfunction.
Maxheader
(4,373 posts)At wichita...called spirit then...The question I had was why were they going from a domed bulk head to a flat?
I was contract engineering at the time..Directs don't like hanging out the dirty laundry. Turns out later the
stresses from the vertical fin were causing some "problems" within the structure and the flat bulkhead was
an attempt to strengthen the load paths down in the fuselage....48 section..
Bengus81
(6,932 posts)Bengus81
(6,932 posts)Same rudder problem they couldn't figure out or just blamed on pilot error?
MaxFine
(42 posts)Those guys were as cool as a cucumber.