US deploys carrier strike group to send 'clear and unmistakable message' to Iran
Source: The Hill
The United States is deploying a carrier strike group and a bomber task force to the Middle East in response to what it called "troubling and escalatory indications and warnings" from Iran, national security adviser John Bolton announced on Sunday.
Bolton said in a statement that the USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group and a bomber task force would be deployed to a region overseen by the Pentagon's U.S. Central Command, whose areas of responsibility include the Middle East.
"In response to a number of troubling and escalatory indications and warnings, the United States is deploying the USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group and a bomber task force to the U.S. Central Command region to send a clear and unmistakable message to the Iranian regime that any attack on United States interests or on those of our allies will be met with unrelenting force," Bolton said.
"The United States is not seeking war with the Iranian regime, but we are fully prepared to respond to any attack, whether by proxy, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, or regular Iranian forces."
Read more: https://thehill.com/policy/defense/442229-us-deploys-carrier-strike-group-to-send-clear-and-unmistakable-message-to-iran
Oh bullshit Bolton
Harker
(14,020 posts)sakabatou
(42,152 posts)at140
(6,110 posts)Just like Bush-43's dream was to change regime in Iraq, Trump is wetting his panties about Iran.
If Mueller report was conclusively against Trump, Iran war would have already started.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)at140
(6,110 posts)Especially Bolton, who never met a war he did not like.
Marcuse
(7,487 posts)at140
(6,110 posts)I can't think of a single leader fighting in combat since Napoleon Bonaparte.
LuvLoogie
(7,009 posts)Teddy Roosevelt, Ulysses S. Grant.
at140
(6,110 posts)That was BEFORE they became leaders. Even Hitler was a corporal in army.
But all his war mongering was AFTER he became leader of the Third Reich.
But did Hitler go to the front to fight in combat? NO!
Did Bush-41 go to the front in Kuwait to dislodge Iraqi army? NO!
JFK got US involved in Vietnam after he was elected president.
He did not captain any speed boats in Vietnam while president.
LuvLoogie
(7,009 posts)the sanity of any modern head of state that would "armor up" as a combatant.
That said, the term "chicken hawk" applies in many cases, Bolton and trump being examples.
The formula of conquest in order to rule is too dated and dangerous for most power banks. They don't have to destroy another country in order to destroy it.
at140
(6,110 posts)their lives in combat, why should those leaders who send them should stay safely behind?
Alexander the Great never did.
Napoleon Bonaparte fought with soldiers.
Shivaji who liberated India from Mughal rulers never stayed behind.
Trump should send Don Jr & Eric to lead the attack on Iran.
Otherwise Trump is another chicken hawk.
emmaverybo
(8,144 posts)Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)"We have boats, and we aren't afraid to use them."
pangaia
(24,324 posts)UpInArms
(51,284 posts)🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬
Eugene
(61,899 posts)Source: Associated Press
44 minutes ago
WASHINGTON (AP) The Latest on United States and Iran (all times local):
10:25 p.m.
A U.S. defense official says the deployments of an aircraft carrier strike group and land-based bombers to the Middle East are in response to indications that Iran and its proxy forces were preparing to possibly attack U.S. forces in the region.
The defense official tells The Associated Press that the Pentagon approved the deployments of the USS Abraham Lincoln and its strike group of ships and combat aircraft.
The official says U.S. forces at sea and on land were thought to be the potential targets. The official wasnt authorized to discuss the matter publicly and requested anonymity.
A White House statement says the military resources were deployed to send a message to Iran that unrelenting force will meet any attack on U.S. interests or those of its allies.
-snip-
Read more: https://apnews.com/b64d3f60cc5d4db5a812b4d11e39a0da
watoos
(7,142 posts)Iran didn't do anything to provoke the US, Trump got his countries mixed up, it was N. Korea.
sinkingfeeling
(51,457 posts)A reason for US to start a military action.
B Stieg
(2,410 posts)pazzyanne
(6,556 posts)and North Korea's expanding their nuclear options. Tell me again how tRump is representing the United States of America.
infullview
(981 posts)Next tRump will claim martial law and delay elections. He's following the dictator's playbook.
Ramsey Barner
(349 posts)Otherwise, the stable genius will let Bolton create a Mustache Cloud over Tehran.
Blues Heron
(5,937 posts)what? No? Then F these violent-thinking fuckwits.
Bayard
(22,075 posts)Except boys wanting to play with their toys.
I'd like to hear these, "indications". Sabre rattling? Something worth starting another war over? Just in time for 2020 elections, to get MAGA's more riled up, along with the brain dead who always say you should support a prez in times of war.
Firestorm49
(4,035 posts)kimbutgar
(21,155 posts)Msnbc this am discussing but saying it is the US trying to provoke Iran into a war. Iran knows that the orange anus and Bolton want a war and they will not respond. And that nut job in Israel also is pushing for a war with Iran.