Boeing to replace 900 inspectors with technology amid increased scrutiny over 737 Max
Source: USA Today
Boeing is pushing ahead on a plan to cut about 900 inspectors, replacing their jobs with technology improvements at its Seattle area factories, despite being under fire for software flaws in the 737 Max and quality issues in its other aircraft.
The union has raised an outcry, calling it a "bad decision" that will "eliminate the second set of eyes on thousands of work packages" in its newsletter to members.
Some 451 inspectors will be transferred to other jobs this year, and about the same number next year, out of a total of about 3,000 at its commercial aircraft operations in the Seattle area, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, Local 751, has told its members.
... snip ...
But when it comes to paring its inspection staff on the West Coast, Boeing says the "QA Transformation Plan" won't undermine safety. Substituting technology gains, it says, will increase quality and effect only "stable" procedures, those in which there is a low probability of mistakes.
Read more: https://amp.usatoday.com/amp/3650026002
Ummm .... what a grand idea!
turbinetree
(24,703 posts)this normalization that "technology" is better than a human eye....................bull shit...................I guess Boeing forgets that when a spy satellite takes a picture, a set of human eyes looks at the picture...................I guess they forgot when some of there planes became convertibles in flight because of technology failure, on the lap joint, thinking that there would not be a failure, until after the fact ..............................................
Sapient Donkey
(1,568 posts)I understand that technology can streamline and make a single person more efficient to the point that not as many humans are needed to do the same work, but given the recent events with Boeing I have reservations about their judgement when it comes to doing the right thing.
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)technology that better HELPS the inspectors, and faster followthrough are the answers.
rocktivity
DENVERPOPS
(8,825 posts)Soooooo typical of corporations:
Problems being given by Safety Inspectors to Executives???????
Get rid of the Safety Inspectors, problem solved.
These were computer PROGRAMMING caused problems.......not really correctible by computers........the onboard computer systems caused this whole mess, not because the computers were defective, but because they were poorly programmed....
pazzyanne
(6,556 posts)Whatever in the world could go wrong with this plan?
not fooled
(5,801 posts)Talk about bad timing--with all of the negative publicity re Boeing and lack of adequate concern for safety.
Just goes to show that the arrogance of corporate America knows no bounds.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)Blame the workers and replace them with robots, automation and AI.
Stuart G
(38,427 posts)PSPS
(13,599 posts)Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,752 posts)Kablooie
(18,634 posts)It's reported that they had hundreds of reports of the 737 angle sensor problem and did nothing about it.
I get the feeling that Boeing is flailing and trying out every idea and story they can think of to defend themselves from the 737 disasters.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)(Except for the harsh bright white/blue LED overhead reading lights and the ones in the lavatory.)
keithbvadu2
(36,809 posts)"Technology" seems to be a factor in two 737 Max crashes.