Virtual Caucus at Risk After DNC Experts Hacked Conference Call
Source: Bloomberg
By Tyler Pager
August 24, 2019, 2:19 PM PDT
The Democratic National Committee has raised substantial cybersecurity concerns over virtual caucusing, potentially dooming the effort just five months before Iowa begins its process of choosing a presidential nominee.
At a closed-door session of the Rules and By-Laws Committee on Thursday, the DNC told the panel that experts convened by the party were able to hack into a conference call among the committee, the Iowa Democratic Party and Nevada Democratic Party, raising concerns about teleconferencing for virtual caucuses, according to three people who were at the meeting.
For the first time the DNC is requiring states that hold caucuses instead of primary elections to offer voters a way to participate without showing up at sites across the state. Iowa and Nevada are building a teleconference system for 2020, and Alaska plans a phone and web-based operation.
The state parties are waiting for final approval of their plans for the February caucuses in Iowa and Nevada and hoped it would come at the DNCs summer meeting this week in San Francisco.
We are continuing to work with Democrats in these states to address the Rules and By-Laws committees questions about their proposed plans," the DNC said in a statement Saturday.
Read more: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-24/dnc-virtual-caucus-at-risk-after-experts-hacked-conference-call?srnd=premium
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)Perseus
(4,341 posts)This is something I have been asking myself for months...They know the republicans, aided by the Russians, are going to cheat, that their cyber attack is and will be restless, the FBI warned, Muller warned, but they do nothing, they still get surprised. I am more concerned with voting machines because those are going to change the votes in key states.
MrsCoffee
(5,801 posts)The Ununity Reform thing always seemed super sketch to me.
LiberalFighter
(50,939 posts)Unless the vote is done in sight of those in charge it should not be held.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)Evidence of that would be interesting. I thought caucus locations were local and well-turned out.
Why am I not surprised about said complaints?
Just out of morbid curiosity, did these states come up with their own schemes for teleconferencing, or did they go to established teleconference companies that just might have security in mind when they sign you up?
LiberalFighter
(50,939 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,939 posts)They were only interested in getting an advantage.
Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)PSPS
(13,599 posts)Um, you can't "hack into a conference call." It sounds like they're using the internet for this which is always a big, big mistake. Web-based conferences are completely insecure. They should be using a legitimate conference call provider that uses telephone numbers participants dial into.
SunSeeker
(51,559 posts)Maggiemayhem
(809 posts)pecosbob
(7,541 posts)We need a straight primary vote in Nevada...no more chicanery.
Roy Rolling
(6,917 posts)At the size gatherings they suggest ensuring every participant is a card-carrying, loyal to America Democrat is virtually impossible. (No pun intended)
Its a public gathering for Gods sake, what is it they want to hide?
Spies are everywhere, deal with it. We cant instantaneously put that genie back in the bottle for 2020. With convenience comes compromise. Make a fucking decision but stop whining about security. Go hard on things that require strict security and stop the charade elsewhere.
We are all vulnerable, dont put your business on the street.
still_one
(92,202 posts)a process that discriminates people with mobility issues, and people trying to bully people into voting one way or another
agalisgv
(148 posts)Or maybe have a better vetting process for their own IT people?