Trump's communications with foreign leader are part of whistleblower complaint that spurred standoff
Source: WaPo
By
Greg Miller, Ellen Nakashima and Shane Harris
September 18, 2019 at 8:56 p.m. EDT
The whistleblower complaint that has triggered a tense showdown between the U.S. intelligence community and Congress involves President Trump's communications with a foreign leader, according to two former U.S. officials familiar with the matter.
Trump's interaction with the foreign leader included a "promise" that was regarded as so troubling that it prompted an official in the U.S. intelligence community to file a formal whistleblower complaint with the inspector general for the intelligence community, said the officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.
It was not immediately clear which foreign leader Trump was speaking with or what he pledged to deliver, but his direct involvement in the matter has not been previously disclosed. It raises new questions about the president's handling of sensitive information and may further strain his relationship with U.S. spy agencies. One former official said the communication was a phone call.
The White House did not respond to requests for comment. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence and a lawyer representing the whistleblower declined to comment.
Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson determined that the complaint was credible and troubling enough to be considered a matter of "urgent concern," a legal threshold that requires notification of congressional oversight committees.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/trumps-communications-with-foreign-leader-are-part-of-whistleblower-complaint-that-spurred-standoff-between-spy-chief-and-congress-former-officials-say/2019/09/18/df651aa2-da60-11e9-bfb1-849887369476_s
tblue37
(64,979 posts)dawg day
(7,947 posts)MBZ?
>according to two former U.S. officials familiar with the matter.
Hmm, still sounding like Coats and his former deputy Sue Gordon, who resigned almost in tandem right before the complaint was filed.
And Coats interrupted a meeting Gordon was having to recommend she resign with him. Hmm, wonder what he said? "Leave with me, and we'll both file the complaint with the IG."
trueblue2007
(17,138 posts)this week. It sounds realllyyyyyyyyyy scary !!!
PerceptionManagement
(461 posts)and continue to commit further treason and sedition
Jim__
(14,045 posts)At this point, I doubt it.
SergeStorms
(18,882 posts)And since they only watch FOX Noise, the chances of that are slim and none.
ck4829
(34,971 posts)In this case, Putin or whoever would have to annex their house.
Amaryllis
(9,523 posts)the medial is close to knwoing who the whistelblower is, right?
dalton99a
(81,065 posts)SergeStorms
(18,882 posts)I wonder what the orange asshole gave away this time? Oh, November 2020 can't come soon enough, so let's impeach the bastard!
yaesu
(8,020 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,694 posts)Jesus H. Christ. More obstruction and probably an impeachable offense.
world wide wally
(21,718 posts)Any calls with MBS?
gordianot
(15,226 posts)Can a walrus whistle?
ffr
(22,644 posts)Give this the airtime it warrants. The country you've grown up to needs you to act like journalists, not advertising whores.
IT'S TIME TO STEP UP AND BE COUNTED AS AMERICANS.
aggiesal
(8,863 posts)ABCNNBCBSFOX
PSPS
(13,512 posts)ck4829
(34,971 posts)Stuart G
(38,359 posts)A troubling promise to someone...."so troubling that it prompted an official in the U.S. intelligence community to file a formal whistleblower complaint with the inspector general for the intelligence community,"
This is it...Trump thought that he was making a private promise to someone....but it was overheard by the intelligence community." This one says it all. (in my opinion)
Bayard
(21,801 posts)Does it mean the intelligence officer was in the room? (then it would be easy to figure out who it was). That they have the Oval Office bugged? It doesn't sound like this is third hand information, and if it is, that means others know.
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)🙏
amcgrath
(397 posts)What's he saying when he meets one on on behind closed doors, demands the translators hand over their notes for destruction and threatens them with prosecution for talking about what was discussed ?
EarthFirst
(2,877 posts)He has no filter; so the depth and breadth of the information being transferred is without a doubt; treasonous.