Income Inequality Grows To Its Highest Level In 50 Years
Source: Associated Press
The gap between the haves and have-nots in the United States grew last year to its highest level in more than 50 years of tracking income inequality, according to U.S. Census Bureau figures released Thursday.
Income inequality in the United States expanded from 2017 to 2018, with several heartland states among the leaders of the increase, even though several wealthy coastal states still had the most inequality overall, according to the figures.
The nation's Gini Index, which measures income inequality, has been rising steadily over the past five decades. The Gini Index grew from 0.482 in 2017 to 0.485 last year, according to the bureau's one-year American Community Survey data. The Gini Index is on a scale of 0 to 1; a score of "0'' indicates perfect equality, while a score of 1 indicates perfect inequality, where one household has all the income.
The increase in income inequality comes as two Democratic presidential candidates, U.S. Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, are pitching a wealth tax on the nation's richest citizens as a way to reduce wealth disparities. -MORE...
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/us-income-inequality-grows-to-its-highest-level-in-50-years/ar-AAHRBWn?ocid=HPCOMMDHP15
Last year areas with the most income inequality were coastal regions with large amounts of wealth DC, New York and Connecticut as well as areas with great poverty: Puerto Rico and Louisiana. Utah, Alaska, Iowa, North Dakota and South Dakota had the most economic equality.
Three of the states with the biggest gains in inequality from 2017 to 2018 were places with large pockets of wealth: California, Texas and Virginia. But the other six states were primarily in the heartland: Alabama, Arkansas, Kansas, Nebraska, New Hampshire and New Mexico.
Many factors were at play, from a slowdown in agricultural trade and manufacturing to wages that haven't caught up with other forms of income, economists say. While some states have raised the minimum wage, other states such as Kansas haven't.
Also, sustained economic growth from the recession a decade ago has enriched people who own stocks, property and other assets, and have sources of income other than wages. "We've had a period of sustained economic growth, and there are winners and losers. The winners tend to be at the top," Ginther said. "Even though we are at full employment, wages really haven't gone up much in the recovery."
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)If "The nation's Gini Index, which measures income inequality has been rising steadily over the past five decades." then 50 years ago the index would have been much lower and not a high water mark. That would have made it 1969 and a period with still strong labor unions and the war in Viet Nam going strong so times were pretty good. Perhaps they meant to say more than 90 years, taking us back to 1928 and just before the stock market crash.
appalachiablue
(41,113 posts)">The nation's Gini Index, which measures income inequality, has been rising steadily over the past five decades"<
progree
(10,901 posts)Selected Measures of Household Income Dispersion: 1967 to 2018 [<1.0 MB]
Table A-5. Selected Measures of Equivalence-Adjusted Income Dispersion
Selected Measures of Equivalence-Adjusted Income Dispersion: 1967 to 2018 [< 1.0MB]
...
I looked at the below (I opened the spreadsheet) and the first year was 1967.
Gini Ratios for Households, by Race and Hispanic Origin of Householder [<1.0 MB]
https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/tables/time-series/historical-income-households/h04.xls
appalachiablue
(41,113 posts)appalachiablue
(41,113 posts)INCOME INEQUALITY In America Is The Highest It's Been Since Census Started Tracking It
'Income inequality in America is the highest its been since census started tracking it, data shows.' In the midst of the nations longest economic expansion, the separation between rich and poor is at a five-decade high. Washington Post, Sept. 26, 2019.
Income inequality in the United States has hit its highest level since the Census Bureau started tracking it more than five decades ago, according to data released Thursday, even as the nations poverty and unemployment rates are at historic lows. The gulf is starkest in wealthy regions along both coasts such as New York, Connecticut, California and Washington, D.C., as well as in areas with widespread poverty, such as Puerto Rico and Louisiana. Equality was highest in Utah, Alaska and Iowa.
And while the nation is in the midst of its longest economic expansion, nine states saw spikes in inequality from 2017 to 2018: Alabama, Arkansas, California, Kansas, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Texas and Virginia.
The Gini index measures wealth distribution across a population, with zero representing total equality and 1 representing total inequality, where all wealth is concentrated in a single household. The indicator has been rising steadily for several decades. When the Census Bureau began studying income inequality in 1967, the Gini index was 0.397. In 2018, it climbed to 0.485. By comparison, no European nation had a score greater than 0.38 last year...
https://www.democraticunderground.com/1016239923
appalachiablue
(41,113 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(48,986 posts)scipan
(2,341 posts)We're the 4th worst after taxes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_income_equality#Gini_coefficient,_after_taxes_and_transfers
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,986 posts)Bradical79
(4,490 posts)Headline writer didn't do a good job.
Roy Rolling
(6,911 posts)Theres class warfare, all right, but its my class, the rich class, thats making war, and were winning.
SergeStorms
(19,190 posts)The very wealthy are doing all the fighting to "make the pie higher" (remember that?). The almost extinct middle class and the poor haven't had anyone fighting for them, and they're too damned busy trying to make ends meet to fight for themselves.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,986 posts)Such levels of income inequality do not last, historically.
If they are not corrected democratically, they get corrected violently in revolutions. Or dramatically with huge economic upheavals like the great depression.
FakeNoose
(32,612 posts)That's the real story. The rest of us are doing OK (or not) but we're still within a stone's throw of where we were in 1980 when Reagan took office. The humongous growth on the charts shows most of the wealth going to the super-wealthy class, and they're not sharing with anybody. Our US tax laws aren't helping either.
Yavin4
(35,427 posts)Remember the "peace dividend"? Remember how we were going to channel money away from defense into shoring up social security and bigger investments in education? Remember all of that?
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)One would think that this chart would closely follow movement in the Dow. It doesn't.
FakeNoose
(32,612 posts)Our parents and grandparents all shared in that boom. Unions were strong then and unemployment was way down. That's the kind of growth we'd love to see again, but the Reagan boom was co-opted by the one-percenters. Nowadays the middle class is almost on life-support, and the next generation is ready to give up. My 12 year old grandson will face very different world than the one we Baby-boomers were handed.
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)While all 3 were fairly shallow the Eisenhower years were fairly tough, especially in the Midwest, and that opened the door to JFK being elected. While Ike was personable and well liked his policies, except for getting us out of Korea and the interstate highway system, were not well liked.