Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,275 posts)
Fri Oct 18, 2019, 05:55 PM Oct 2019

Supreme Court will rule on expedited removal of those denied asylum requests

Source: Washington Post

The Supreme Court said Friday it will review a lower court decision that hinders the Trump administration’s desire to more quickly deport undocumented immigrants after their requests for asylum have been denied. The case concerns “expedited removal,” a procedure approved by Congress in 1996. Currently, it provides quick removal of thousands of people who are arrested within 100 miles of the border, less than two weeks after arrival, when U.S. officials do not find they make a credible case that they would be persecuted if returned to their home countries.

But in the case at hand, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit said the Constitution gives a man from Sri Lanka more of a chance to make his case to a federal judge. Vijayakumar Thuraissigiam is being represented by the American Civil Liberties Union. “The expedited removal process provides drastically truncated administrative procedures, and virtually no judicial review of purely legal claims, and even of claims that the removal would violate the Constitution,” wrote ACLU lawyer Lee Gelernt. “By comparison, noncitizens placed in regular removal proceedings are afforded a full immigration hearing, an administrative appeal, and judicial review on a petition for review to the federal court of appeals.”

The Trump administration, which wants to expand the expedited removal process to apply to even more undocumented immigrants, asked the Supreme Court to review the 9th Circuit’s decision. The effect of the 9th Circuit’s ruling, Solicitor General Noel J. Francisco told the court, would be to delay removal of aliens such as Thuraissigiam, “preventing expedited removal of such aliens from being expedited at all and undermining the government’s ability to control the border.”

The case does not directly concern the administration’s efforts to enhance the expedited removal program to include aliens who have been in the United States as long as two years and could be anywhere in the country. A federal judge has blocked that initiative while litigation continues.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-will-rule-on-expedited-removal-of-those-denied-asylum-requests/2019/10/18/916a4716-f1dd-11e9-89eb-ec56cd414732_story.html

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court will rule o...