New picture emerging of "terrorist attack" in Benghazi
Source: Reuters
(Reuters) - Thu Sep 20, 2012 6:21am BST
The U.S. Consulate in Benghazi apparently was not troubled at first by a smattering of protesters on the anniversary of the September 11 attacks last week, but that changed abruptly at 9:35 p.m. when it sent a message that the building was under heavy assault, U.S. government sources said.
New information emerging a week after attackers launched rocket-propelled grenades and mortars and killed four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador to Libya Christopher Stevens, suggests that the protests at the outset were so small and unthreatening as to attract little notice.
While many questions remain, the latest accounts differ from the initial information provided by the Obama administration, which had suggested that protests in front of the consulate over an anti-Islamic film had played a major role in precipitating the subsequent violent attack.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/09/20/uk-usa-libya-consulate-idUKBRE88I1IS20120920
Read more: http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/09/20/uk-usa-libya-consulate-idUKBRE88I1IS20120920
Further down the article the claim made that Blackwater had the security contract appears to be contradicted.
blm
(113,091 posts)They ginned up the violence to do exactly what the film-maker and many RW extremists here want - a prolonged, violent confrontation with the Muslim world - coincides with what Bin Laden wanted, too.
RW extremists are the minority in all these countries want to drag the rest of the world into waging the battles and genocides THEY envision - including the crazies in this country, like those who made that film and publicly post disgusting, incendiary posts on Facebook and YouTube.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)if you really think that "RW extremists are the minority in all these countries want to drag the rest of the world into waging the battles and genocides THEY envision" how the hell do you think the "revolution" in Libya started? Do you think it was democracy-loving freedom fighters from Yemen and Saudi Arabia coming in to join them?
If the majority of the Libyan people were on the side of the revolution, why did they need military support from the strongest countries in the world? The US military wasn't needed to help the revolutionaries in Egypt and Tunisia.
As much as it sickens me, we made our own bed in Libya, and now we have to lie in it. It's not as if this is the first shitty foreign policy/military decision made by the US since WWII - it follows the pattern of usually making a terrible decision. Time after time, for over 60 years now, we've based policy on "the enemy of our enemy is our friend" and I can't think of a single time when that's been the case.
UnseenUndergrad
(249 posts)If the majority of the Libyan people were on the side of the revolution, why did they need military support from the strongest countries in the world? The US military wasn't needed to help the revolutionaries in Egypt and Tunisia.
Let's see: heap big weaponry that he bought while playing nicey-nice with Europe and the US, existing weaponry from the former Soviet sphere along with mercenaries and techs from same, Sahelian and Sub-Saharan mercenaries loosely connecting to his support of the African Union (and the source of most of the racist backlash immediately post war), A state apparatus controlled through fear and patronage and Russia and China remaining on the fence for the longest time.
I hope I've covered most of it.
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)people are needed to operate those weapons. The police and the militaries of Egypt and Tunisia were more-or-less on the side of the revolutionaries. For the most part, this was not the case in Libya. There were a great number of Libyans fighting for the country they had and loved.
As for mercenaries, there were plenty on the side of the revolutionaries from Saudia Arabia, Yemen, etc.
Libya is also the only country of those three where blacks were murdered because of their race and dumbed in mass graves or simply left to rot.
We fucked up in Libya. Just how bad is now becoming more clear.
johnfunk
(6,113 posts)And I know I'm not alone in my suspicions.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Although the Libyan government wishes it was Gaddafi loyalists.
blm
(113,091 posts).
liberallibral
(272 posts)The President's Administration, and especially Susan Rice were adamant about the attacks being due solely to the video...
Now they have to back-track...
Awful! Romney is a complete buffoon, and keeps giving us the gift of GAFFES that keep on giving - and we can't seem to put him away..... Very annoying and scary!!!
glacierbay
(2,477 posts)I've been saying this from the first time I saw Susan Rice on Sun. adamantly insisting that this was a spontaneous attack, and not a pre-planned attack. I was shaking my head thinking does she honestly think that the vast majority of americans, or the world for that matter, believe that?
I truly hope this doesn't bite the Admin. in the ass too hard.