Democrats unveil resolution setting scope of public phase of impeachment inquiry of Trump
Source: Washington Post
The House Democrats unveiled a resolution Tuesday afternoon to set the parameters of the public phase of the impeachment inquiry. They plan to vote to formalize it Thursday.
President Trump and Republican lawmakers continued to assail the impeachment process as House investigators heard testimony for the first time from a White House official who listened in on the controversial Trump call at the heart of the Ukraine controversy.
Lt. Col. Alexander S. Vindman, a top Ukraine expert on the National Security Council, was expected to testify that he did not think it was proper for Trump to demand that Ukraine investigate former vice president Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden and feared that doing so undermined U.S. national security.
Ahead of Vindmans closed-door deposition, Trump complained about testimony from people that I never even heard of, while GOP allies continued to portray the process as unfair. Some also questioned Vindmans loyalty because he was born in Ukraine.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-impeachment-inquiry-live-updates/2019/10/29/225c84e8-f9de-11e9-8906-ab6b60de9124_story.html
Full headline: Live updates: Democrats unveil resolution setting scope of public phase of impeachment inquiry of Trump, empowering Schiff to make key decisions
Copy of the resolution - https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/BILLS-116-HRes660.pdf (PDF)
Copy of Fact Sheet -https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/InquiryResolutionFactSheet.pdf (PDF)
Original article -
This is a developing story. It will be updated.
Here is the text of the "Fact Sheet" -
Key Provisions in the Resolution
Reaffirms the ongoing impeachment inquiry.
Ensures transparency.
Enables effective public hearings.
oThis approach builds on the precedent of having staff counsels conduct initial questioning, followed by Member questions, that Republicans set for the questioning of Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr in 1998.
Provides the President opportunities to participate.
oPresent their case and respond to evidence;
oSubmit written requests for additional testimony or other evidence;
oAttend hearings, including those held in executive session;
oRaise an objection to testimony given; and
oCross-examine witnesses.
Directs the Committee on the Judiciary to review the evidence and, if necessary, to report Articles of Impeachment to the House.
###
Yavin4
(35,453 posts)witnesses.
nykym
(3,063 posts)For Hilary's emails, Benghazi, Fast & Furious, Obama's Birth certificate, Democratic National Committee server in Ukraine, FBI spying on tRump and so on...
Fiendish Thingy
(15,687 posts)The rules give the minority the right to question witnesses, but I don't see any language allowing them to subpeona witnesses or documents.
nykym
(3,063 posts)and minority members would get to request subpoenas, ultimately subject to a committee vote.
Of course the chair can squash it but they do have the right.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,320 posts)JudyM
(29,294 posts)They clamored for public hearings and boy are they going to get them. Evidence coming straight out to the public, and if/when littleDon attempts to refute, the Dems control the process. This thwarts, as much as possible, hiding behind fake news and distortions. The more arguments they bring out, the more we shoot down, and we control the pace and the news cycle around this.
Big props to Nancy, Adam and the rest.
BumRushDaShow
(129,727 posts)by GOP circus performers like Jordan, Gaetz, and Gohmert who would love to have a Mueller hearing redux filled with grandstanding, deflections from the subject, and insults.