Hill Democrats, Republicans remain at odds after national security officials make their case for Ira
Source: Washington Post
House Republicans were satisfied and Democrats exasperated by Wednesdays Iran briefing from top national security officials, during which they argued that President Trump had legal authority to kill a top military commander without seeking Congresss permission and that he did so to ward off an imminent threat.
Sophomoric and utterly unconvincing, Rep. Gerald E. Connolly (D-Va.), a member of the House Foreign Affairs and Oversight committees said upon exiting the closed-door briefing, adding that Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, Defense Secretary Mark T. Esper, CIA director Gina Haspel and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Mark Milley made no case that Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani posed an imminent threat.
Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), a Trump confidante who also sits on both committees, emerged from the same briefing calling it the strongest and most decisive briefing that has ever been conducted in that classified setting, praising Haspel especially for sharing compelling and exhaustive evidence about the need for the strike.
It leaves little doubt in my mind and certainly should leave little doubt in any members mind that not only did the president make the right call, but that this was a clear and present danger for American interests and American individuals, Meadows said.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/national-security-officials-to-deliver-iran-briefings-for-congress-as-conflict-appears-to-de-escalate/2020/01/08/2854e8ea-322d-11ea-a053-dc6d944ba776_story.html
hibbing
(10,098 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)I mean, good grief:
llmart
(15,540 posts)We knew this was coming. We should not be too surprised.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)He's a stand up guy's stand up guy.
Atticus
(15,124 posts)what he thinks of GOP Senator Lee's characterization of the briefing as "the worst briefing on a military matter I've had in my nine years!"