Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,096 posts)
Thu Jan 16, 2020, 10:59 AM Jan 2020

White House hold on Ukraine aid violated federal law, congressional watchdog says

Source: Washington Post

The White House violated federal law in its hold on security aid to Ukraine last year, according to a decision by a congressional watchdog released on Thursday and reviewed by The Washington Post. The Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan agency that reports to Congress, found the Trump administration violated a law that governs how the White House disburses money approved by Congress.

The GAO decision comes as the Senate prepares for the impeachment trial of President Trump, a process set to begin Thursday. "Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law," the decision states. "OMB withheld funds for a policy reason, which is not permitted under the Impoundment Control Act." Last month, the Democratic-controlled House impeached Trump on charges of abusing the power of his office in a pressure campaign against Ukraine.

Trump has attacked the impeachment charges as politically motivated. White House budget officials have defended their power to stop the money from being given to the Defense Department, arguing both congressional lawmakers and executive branch officials routinely demand delays on funding already signed into law.

The report brings new scrutiny to a chain of events at the White House's Office of Management and Budget last year. When top White House officials gave directives to the Pentagon to withhold aid for Ukraine, some OMB officials objected, warning the halt could be improper. At least two officials resigned, in part over concerns about the Ukraine money.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/white-house-hold-on-ukraine-aid-violated-federal-law-congressional-watchdog-says/2020/01/16/060ea7aa-37a3-11ea-9c01-d674772db96b_story.html



EDIT: COPY OF GAO REPORT (pdf) - https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/legal-opinion-from-gao-on-white-house-hold-on-ukraine-aid/c84e9a1c-8edc-4531-8d34-c00e855d5d7a/

Of course they did. Anyone who has taken any "Appropriations Law" courses (these are given as part of Contract/Project Management track courses) would know this.

Original article and headline -

Trump administration violated the law by withholding Ukraine security aid, Government Accountability Office finds

By Washington Post Staff
Jan. 16, 2020 at 9:56 a.m. EST

In a new report, the nonpartisan congressional watchdog agency formally challenges the way the White House blocked the Ukraine money last year. The White House's actions related to the Ukraine funds are at the heart of an impeachment process that is slated to begin in the Senate Thursday.

This is a developing story. It will be updated.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2020/01/16/trump-administration-violated-the-law-by-withholding-ukraine-security-aid-government-accountability-office-finds/
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House hold on Ukraine aid violated federal law, congressional watchdog says (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 OP
Hot off the presses. It's still "By Washington Post Staff." NT mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2020 #1
Updated and good Friday Eve morning! BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #2
This is big deal Gothmog Jan 2020 #3
This is why some of those poor civil servants stuck in the approval chain when this happened BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #5
You are totally correct, If the GAO says Trump broke the law, that's PROOF he "broke a law" Stuart G Jan 2020 #6
+1 ChiTownDenny Jan 2020 #14
When I asked Sen. Martha McSally if she would consider new evidence as part of the Senate trial.... mahatmakanejeeves Jan 2020 #4
Does she think that will help her get re-elected? Mickju Jan 2020 #15
RW sites still say there was no withholding at all, let alone breaking law. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2020 #7
So the GAO is now part of the deep state..... Chakaconcarne Jan 2020 #8
He also aided and abetted Russia and putin in their aggression towards Ukraine, duforsure Jan 2020 #9
Every.Single.Trump.Defense.Talking.Point.Crushed in just the last 36 hrs Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #10
Hallelujah! New Leaf Jan 2020 #12
Yep. calimary Jan 2020 #11
Stock repug answers infullview Jan 2020 #13
So much for the party of law and order Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2020 #16

BumRushDaShow

(129,096 posts)
5. This is why some of those poor civil servants stuck in the approval chain when this happened
Thu Jan 16, 2020, 11:18 AM
Jan 2020

decided to go on and resign/leave rather than eventually be caught in a big legal mess (way worse than the illegalities of Carson's bogus furniture buys or many now-departed Department heads' bogus travel/security plans).

Stuart G

(38,436 posts)
6. You are totally correct, If the GAO says Trump broke the law, that's PROOF he "broke a law"
Thu Jan 16, 2020, 11:20 AM
Jan 2020

The GEO knows the game, because it is an expert in the game.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,489 posts)
4. When I asked Sen. Martha McSally if she would consider new evidence as part of the Senate trial....
Thu Jan 16, 2020, 11:18 AM
Jan 2020

Last edited Thu Jan 16, 2020, 11:48 AM - Edit history (1)

Kevin M. Kruse Retweeted

They are all Trump clones now.



Sen. Martha McSally, a Republican facing a difficult election race, lashed out when I asked if she would consider new evidence as part of the Senate trial. “You’re a liberal hack - I’m not talking to you. You’re a liberal hack.” She then walked into a hearing room.



Worth noting that the question McSally wouldn't answer is "should the Senate consider new evidence as part of the impeachment trial?"



Wow. Here's @SenMcSallyAZ angrily calling @mkraju "a liberal hack" while refusing to answer questions


duforsure

(11,885 posts)
9. He also aided and abetted Russia and putin in their aggression towards Ukraine,
Thu Jan 16, 2020, 11:49 AM
Jan 2020

And by ignoring its dispersal , and using it as a weapon against Ukraine , exposed why it is against the law, and considered illegal to be abused and used by trump for his own political benefit. Also if trump was illegally using our intel or using a foreign intel to comit crimes that should be completely investigated, and the House should start it knowing Barr is compromised . If the Republicans refuse to convict , it will show they conspired for trump to ignore his criminal activities. Were they bribed by Putin? And In exchange for help with their re-elections?

New Leaf

(20 posts)
12. Hallelujah!
Thu Jan 16, 2020, 12:19 PM
Jan 2020

I’m so proud and happy today with the hard work SOME of our leaders and journalists have engaged in to bring us to the amazing place we are today! Just need to believe things will finally happen to rid us of this poison afflicting our country and the world.

infullview

(981 posts)
13. Stock repug answers
Thu Jan 16, 2020, 12:22 PM
Jan 2020

Yes, but this does not rise to the level of impeachment.
The democrats that run the GAO are trying to railroad this president!
It's not unusual for the president to withhold aid to make sure there's not corruption.
He has article 2; he has the right to do whatever he wants as president.

besides all this, the republican senate will never hold him accountable because they are all on the take from dark Russian money as well.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House hold on Ukrai...