Architect Of CIA's Torture Program Says It Went Too Far
Source: NPR
One of the architects of the CIA's torture program for the accused 9/11 terrorists testified today in a Guantánamo Bay courtroom that he eventually came to believe those torture techniques had gone too far and verged on breaking the law.
Testifying publicly under oath for the first time as part of a pre-trial hearing for the criminal case against five accused 9/11 terrorists, psychologist and interrogator James Mitchell spoke specifically and graphically about one prisoner, Abu Zubaydah, who was waterboarded more than 80 times at a CIA site overseas. He has been held at Guantánamo for more than 13 years and has never been charged with a crime.
According to Mitchell's testimony, he thought they'd gotten all the information they could from Zubaydah, who had agreed to cooperate. Mitchell wanted the waterboarding to stop and helped draft a message to CIA headquarters saying, "the intensity of the pressure applied to him thus far approaches the legal limit" and that Zubaydah's mental state was deteriorating dangerously.
He said the CIA told them to keep going because Zubaydah might still be withholding valuable information about an imminent U.S. attack. In Mitchell's words, "they were absolutely convinced he had something cooking." Mitchell says he agreed to waterboard Zubaydah just one more time, but he wanted a senior CIA official to come see in person what it looked like. A senior CIA official did attend that waterboarding, during which Mitchell testified Zubaydah was having involuntary body spasms and was crying. Mitchell said he and others in the room became tearful.
Read more: https://www.npr.org/2020/01/22/798561799/architect-of-cias-torture-program-says-it-went-too-far
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)90-percent
(6,829 posts)After a few years or maybe after 2008? Cheney said "of course i ordered the torture, torture works and I'd do it again."
Sadistic imbeciles. The lot of them.
(from memory, some info may be incorrect, paraphrasing and date.)
-90% Jimmy
Warpy
(111,264 posts)We know it doesn't work. We know it's counterproductive, the person being tortured saying anything just to get it to stop. We know how silly that "ticking bomb" scenario is because the person being tortured knows when the bomb will go off and that it will stop then and has no need to share the information.
Sadists will always want to torture people, it's how they're put together, whether they're CIA bosses or Christian "end times" bullies. We had laws and treaties to rein them in and make them turn to history and fiction to get their sick thrills. Frightened men after 9/11 thought we didn't need those laws. They were wrong.
UpInArms
(51,284 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,166 posts)glad he is fessing up. Not sure how 80 times would be necessary, or might yield a different result from the 79th time? But hey, the interrogators for some reason thought so.
UpInArms
(51,284 posts)Drafted by men like John Yoo, and pushed along by White House counsel Alberto Gonzales, the February 7 memo was sent to all of the key players of the Bush Administration involved in the early days of the War on Terror. All the architects and functionaries who would play a role in one of the darker moments in American legal history were in on it. Vice President Dick Cheney. Attorney General John Aschroft. Secretary of State Donald Rumsfeld. CIA Director George Tenet. David Addington. They all got the note. And then they acted upon it.
When we talk today of the "torture memos," most of us think about the later memoranda, like the infamous "Bybee Memo" of August 1, 2002, which authorized the use of torture against terror law detainees. But those later pronouncements of policy, in one way or another, were all based upon the perversion of law and logic contained in the February 7 memo. Once America crossed the line 10 years ago, the memoranda that followed, to a large extent, were merely evidence of the grinding gears of bureaucracy trying to justify itself.
There will likely be other opportunities in 2012 to look back at some of those other memos. Perhaps Jay S. Bybee himself, inexplicably rewarded for his role in the scandal by getting a federal judgeship, will say something. Let's leave that for the dog days of August. Today is a day instead to look at one of the first of these odious documents. It is a day to note how simple and easy it was, it still is, for political leadership to make monumental decisions on our behalf without really telling us -- or by simply telling us something that isn't true.
Men of dark hearts and no souls ...
jalan48
(13,867 posts)In late October 2002, Haspel became a chief of base for a "black site" CIA torture prison located in Thailand.[30][31] She worked at a site that was codenamed "Cat's Eye", which would later become known as the place where suspected al Qaeda terrorist members Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri and Abu Zubaydah were detained and tortured with waterboarding
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gina_Haspel
ConstanceCee
(314 posts)(Paraphrased) The USA doesn't use torture, so if we're doing it, it isn't torture.
ahlnord
(91 posts)A movie starring Adam Driver and Annette Bening came out late last year (2019), "The Report," dealing with our torture program. It is dense with information and brings back a lot of painful history, but I highly recommend it.
mpcamb
(2,871 posts)marble falls
(57,093 posts)captain jack
(316 posts)Marthe48
(16,963 posts)because they are sick, perverted monsters
DeminPennswoods
(15,286 posts)They should all be sent to the Hague to be tried as such.
JHB
(37,160 posts)robbob
(3,531 posts)Stuart G
(38,427 posts)This is not new, ..ratified and became law on December 15, 1791
............ (218 years ago)....................................................................
Amendment VIII:
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.