GOP uses emergency bill for coronavirus testing to fight about abortion
Source: American Independent
By Emily Singer -March 12, 2020 4:47 PM
The White House is trying to kill legislation to fund coronavirus testing by adding anti-abortion language to it.
The White House is objecting to a Democratic bill that would fund coronavirus testing kits for all Americans by demanding that unrelated anti-abortion language be added to the legislation.
House Democrats introduced the "Families First" bill on Thursday, which, along with providing funding for coronavirus test kits, would also call for mandatory paid sick leave for all workers, and ensure that poor Americans hurt by the economic impact of the virus would have access to food security.
But the White House is opposed to the bill, with Donald Trump saying that the bill is filled with "goodies" Democrats have wanted to pass for years.
And in an apparent effort to build opposition to the bill, Republicans, including first son Donald Trump Jr., are claiming the $1 billion in funding the Democratic bill would make available for coronavirus testing would actually be an "abortion slush fund."
Read more: https://americanindependent.com/gop-coronavirus-bill-abortion-hyde-amendment-donald-trump-republicans-congress/
-snip-
..........................
leftieNanner
(15,120 posts)have to do with abortion???
NOTHING!
Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)I would call that opportunism and taking hostages, now.
How dare they bring their wedge issue into this crises!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ancianita
(36,068 posts)vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)This will be the Killer
yaesu
(8,020 posts)certainly just bought their first class ticket there.
TeamPooka
(24,229 posts)RandiFan1290
(6,237 posts)PatSeg
(47,500 posts)They are incapable of doing the right thing regardless of the circumstances.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)trump can veto, mcconnel csn not bring it to a vote, there it is......then when trump/GOP want s$2 TRILLION to bailout of profitable businesses, Pelosi can simply say NOPE
ancianita
(36,068 posts)conditions on doing the right thing.
beachbumbob
(9,263 posts)DC
ancianita
(36,068 posts)It's her opponents who go for the cheap power moves.
The fact that her morality beats them makes it look TO THEM as if she plays their power game. That's what THEY think. But that's not what she's doing.
Dem2theMax
(9,651 posts)Is it wrong to wish everyone in the GOP catches it and dies?
Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)Dem2theMax
(9,651 posts)And thank you.
riversedge
(70,242 posts)I am beyond angry!!
This is not the first time Republicans have tried to add unrelated anti-abortion language to legislation.
Just last month, House Republicans unsuccessfully tried to add anti-abortion language to legislation that bans vaping products for people under the age of 21.
tried to add anti-abortion language to legislation that bans vaping products for people under the age of 21.
rickyhall
(4,889 posts)Problem is it can't be done without Moscow Mitch approval & Putin's servant's signature.
GemDigger
(4,305 posts)Sob's need karma to smack them aside the head.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,586 posts)He holds no government position -- not even "special advisor to the president," like his sister does. The only appropriate response to anything he says or tweets is "STFU!"
NickB79
(19,253 posts)Gotta save those thumb-sized fetuses, but fuck Grandma and Grandpa over there.
Haggis for Breakfast
(6,831 posts)He's also refusing to back off cutting food benefits from 700,000 Americans.
Think about that for a moment.
Sgent
(5,857 posts)clumps of cells the more real people will have to be withdrawn / denied use of respirators. Triage in Italy starts at 55.
Response to turbinetree (Original post)
mercuryblues This message was self-deleted by its author.
ck4829
(35,077 posts)WePurrsevere
(24,259 posts)to create an "abortion slush fund", in this bill or shut up. Heck, it's longer than a paragraph or two so I think I can safely guess that Dolt45 and his idiotic son haven't actually read the whole thing.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6201/text