A mutant coronavirus has emerged, even more contagious than the original, study says
Source: LA Times
Scientists have identified a new strain of the coronavirus that has become dominant worldwide and appears to be more contagious than the versions that spread in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a new study led by scientists at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
The new strain appeared in February in Europe, migrated quickly to the East Coast of the United States and has been the dominant strain across the world since mid-March, the scientists wrote.
In addition to spreading faster, it may make people vulnerable to a second infection after a first bout with the disease, the report warned.
(snip) Wherever the new strain appeared, it quickly infected far more people than the earlier strains that came out of Wuhan, China, and within weeks it was the only strain that was prevalent in some nations, according to the report. The new strain's dominance over its predecessors demonstrates that it is more infectious, according to the report, though exactly why is not yet known.
Read more: https://news.yahoo.com/mutant-coronavirus-emerged-even-more-110046843.html
This is the variant that hit New York. Analysis of reports from Wuhan before the lockdown suggests that SARS-Cov-2 had an R0 of 5.7. A more contagious strain is mind-blowing.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)denem
(11,045 posts)WTH? 😳🤯
machoneman
(4,007 posts)denem
(11,045 posts)and let the good times roll.
Eyeball_Kid
(7,433 posts)gademocrat7
(10,665 posts)TomCADem
(17,390 posts)This is why you cant just ignore an emerging epidemic. Viruses do not know borders. However, Trump is not interested in solving problems. He just wants to make himself rich and find scapegoats.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Wish they all would.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)tRUMP/reTHUGS/cultists are involved...
still_one
(92,303 posts)denem
(11,045 posts)... Italy.
Texin
(2,596 posts)and possibly earlier in Italy and throughout Europe.
Igel
(35,332 posts)Lots of diversity in Wuhan (where it first spread). So, no, you can't blame the Italians in the effort to protect our buddy, the PRC.
The article's authors had to take paints to distinguish between preferential transmission rates and founder effects.
I want to reread the thing after peer review. I can see a few things I don't like, but don't know hardly enough to follow their logic through to any conclusion I trust.
denem
(11,045 posts)I like you, am looking forward to the peer reviewed publication.
NickB79
(19,257 posts)By simply sell infecting more people in a shorter period of time.
Quantity over quality.
sop
(10,222 posts)because of Corona beer. It's no coincidence that we're hearing about this on Cinco De Mayo.
Sancho
(9,070 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,026 posts)Mike 03
(16,616 posts)I wonder if this is actually related to the early stories (February or March) of their being both an L-Type and S-Type strain? Or is this a step even beyond that?
We really can't end the lockdowns. We may have two strains just in the United States. That has been a suspicion for a long time.
denem
(11,045 posts)China and Korea were dealing with the original strain. The second wave in Singapore and Japan may be the variant.
Blue_playwright
(1,568 posts)Have something to do with the oddity of some people being so sick while others have no symptoms at all?
AllyCat
(16,197 posts)So worried for my kids, family, self, and community.
Texin
(2,596 posts)You said it.
turbinetree
(24,709 posts)he might even have a song..........during his next presser any suggestions...............I have couple...........
Mike 03
(16,616 posts)If that is indeed the case, it could make "individuals susceptible to a second infection," the study authors wrote.
Its possible that the mutation changes the spike in some way that helps the virus evade the immune system, said Montefiori, who has worked on an HIV vaccine for 30 years. It is hypothetical. We are looking at it very hard.
This could possibly explain those rare, reported cases of individuals who've "recovered" from COVID-19 and tested negative being reinfected and testing positive again.
PSPS
(13,606 posts)The latest I've heard on that is that those post-recovery positives were false positives. The RNA tests they used were reacting to the presence of a leftover fragment of the virus which was inactive. The patients weren't getting sick again and subsequent tests showed them clear.
JudyM
(29,251 posts)in the first place. This continues to be a problem with our testing.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,644 posts)If we are going to rely on science rather than hysteria, then Lets be scientific, not hysterical.
denem
(11,045 posts)Given we are talking genomics, I take at face value their finding of a variation in the genome. I also take at face value their finding that the identified variant is dominant in Europe and the United States. The conclusion that the the variant is more contagious is trivial.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,644 posts)ancianita
(36,128 posts)You're seeing something that's not there.
ancianita
(36,128 posts)is conclusive yet!
That doesn't mean we diminish each new inconclusive study, does it.
Where would we be if we took that approach. Dead.
Chemisse
(30,814 posts)When I see something like this, I look around and/or wait for additional supportive information. It's not the same as peer review, of course. We don't have time for that. But it lends enough credence to move forward on that supposition.
Many people are wading through scientific reports for the first time in their lives and should not be encouraged to automatically believe the results of every reputable study that has not yet been challenged.
ancianita
(36,128 posts)Chemisse
(30,814 posts)Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)There is so much stuff coming out without review. And even preview sites like biorxiv.org aren't fast enough for some authors, so they are promoting their work in other ways.
Remember the S. Korean researches who announced evidence of reinfection, and a few weeks later said it was measurement error? They did the right thing, but the initial findings caused a lot of doomsday stories.
kairos12
(12,863 posts)denem
(11,045 posts)🙏
bucolic_frolic
(43,238 posts)bluestarone
(17,002 posts)Great future slogan for sure!!
yaesu
(8,020 posts)but time will tell.
iluvtennis
(19,864 posts)zentrum
(9,865 posts)Delphinus
(11,835 posts)confused by this. Today I was listening to an NPR program, Here and Now, and they had a science researcher on that said the virus didn't mutate that much.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,644 posts)NickB79
(19,257 posts)As it spread across Europe and the US over two month's time.
Other than straight up Darwinian selection for a more transmissible virus, what explains this?