Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,034 posts)
Wed May 27, 2020, 07:45 PM May 2020

Texas Supreme Court: Lack of immunity to coronavirus alone isn't enough for mail-in ballot

Source: The Texas Tribune

The Texas Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that a lack of immunity to the new coronavirus does not qualify a voter to apply for a mail-in ballot.

In the latest twist in the legal fight over voting by mail during the coronavirus pandemic, the court agreed with Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton that the risk of contracting the virus alone does not meet the state’s qualifications for voting by mail.

“We agree with the State that a voter’s lack of immunity to COVID-19, without more, is not a ‘disability’ as defined by the Election Code,” the court wrote.

Texas voters can qualify for mail-in ballots only if they are 65 years or older, have a disability or illness, will be out of the county during the election period, or are confined in jail. The Texas election code defines disability as a “sickness or physical condition” that prevents a voter from appearing in person without the risk of “injuring the voter’s health.”

Read more: https://www.texastribune.org/2020/05/27/texas-vote-by-mail-coronavirus/



Link to full decision: In re State of Texas (No. 20-0394)
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

bucolic_frolic

(43,185 posts)
3. How about fear of COVID-19? Agoraphobia
Wed May 27, 2020, 07:55 PM
May 2020

And while you're at it lame brains, shelter in place for months is like being in jail.

maxsolomon

(33,345 posts)
6. Mail-in voter for a decade-plus here - since 2005.
Wed May 27, 2020, 08:32 PM
May 2020

There's simply no explanation for not going to mail-in but GOP intransigence.

High turnout is a conservative's nightmare.

roamer65

(36,745 posts)
7. Sounds like an illegitimate election to me.
Wed May 27, 2020, 10:16 PM
May 2020

If they don’t allow vote by mail during a pandemic, the electors for TX should be annulled.

BadGimp

(4,015 posts)
8. This is NOT a winning argument for Republicans...
Wed May 27, 2020, 10:35 PM
May 2020

As a Senior and an American Citizen, I'm now convinced the GOP does not care if I get sick and die trying to cast my vote. I suspect a lot of us feel the same, in fact, I think we are legion.

SergeStorms

(19,204 posts)
10. First time I've ever applied for an absentee ballot.
Thu May 28, 2020, 01:07 AM
May 2020

There have never been long lines in my voting precinct, to the contrary, I'm usually in and out in 10 minutes. But I'm not taking any chances this time. Like you said, why even take a chance of contracting the virus when I don't have to? I live in a blue state and Trump will get creamed here anyway.

dlk

(11,569 posts)
9. Four judges on the Texas Supreme Court are up for re-election this year
Wed May 27, 2020, 10:42 PM
May 2020

They are all Republicans and each one supremely awful in their own special way:

Nathan Hecht
Jane Bland
Jeffrey Boyd
Brett Busby


FBaggins

(26,748 posts)
12. Not a surprise
Thu May 28, 2020, 10:04 AM
May 2020

There's a difference between good public policy and legal analysis.

Just because voting by mail may be a good policy response, that doesn't mean that existing laws were written to accommodate it. "I'm not immune to X" isn't really a "disability" by itself under laws I've seen.

jgmiller

(395 posts)
13. If we want them to play by the rules then we need to acknowledge when they do
Thu May 28, 2020, 11:18 AM
May 2020

The law in Texas is clear and that's what their supreme court is saying. I have no problem with this ruling. Should the law be changed, sure I think so but it hasn't been so they've ruled correctly.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Texas Supreme Court: Lack...