Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trailmonkee

(2,681 posts)
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 10:07 AM Oct 2012

Judge halts Pa.'s tough new voter ID requirement

Source: ap

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A judge is postponing Pennsylvania's tough new voter identification requirement, ordering that it not be enforced in the presidential election.

Tuesday's ruling comes just five weeks before the election. An appeal is possible. The 6-month-old law requires each voter to show a valid photo ID.

Democrats and groups including the AARP and NAACP mounted a furious opposition to a law Republicans say is necessary to prevent election fraud. Critics have accused Republicans of using old-fashioned Jim Crow tactics to steal the White House and have highlighted stories of registered voters struggling to get a state photo ID.

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gofwU6p1wVa1q_XloJpJkhL2jy8Q?docId=7eb8b0ee54b0499c9caa9776c1eba958

66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge halts Pa.'s tough new voter ID requirement (Original Post) trailmonkee Oct 2012 OP
Also being reported now on MSNBC! Victory!! nt. OldDem2012 Oct 2012 #1
What? I drove ten miles and waited almost four hours for nothing!? onehandle Oct 2012 #2
Cool that's one more safe state, now we have to keep moving on all the other states that have davidpdx Oct 2012 #3
Best news of the day! Efilroft Sul Oct 2012 #4
Am I reading this wrong or will people without ID be issued a provisional ballot? qanda Oct 2012 #5
I don't see anything in that article leftynyc Oct 2012 #8
It looks like the entire long has been halted trailmonkee Oct 2012 #11
I don't see that in the article mindfulNJ Oct 2012 #12
Regarding the provisional ballots... SoapBox Oct 2012 #29
The judge floated that Cosmocat Oct 2012 #46
No provisional ballot but they can still be asked for ID underpants Oct 2012 #52
Right? Am I wrong, or is it that they can ASK for ID, but you don't have to give it???? WTF? October Oct 2012 #55
EXACTLY. not a great ruling. robinlynne Oct 2012 #58
Fantastic!! mindfulNJ Oct 2012 #6
Way yat! lonestarnot Oct 2012 #7
Living in PA that is a HUGE news for me. I have ID but I worried about serveral friends who don't diabeticman Oct 2012 #9
Here in PA, I've heard rumours such as you can be denied the right to vote maddiemom Oct 2012 #26
YOU DON'T NEED AN ID, so "middle initial" is a non-issue. Question: WinkyDink Oct 2012 #39
Multicultural maddiemom Oct 2012 #42
Great news! Jim__ Oct 2012 #10
Best news of the day!!!!! chillfactor Oct 2012 #13
Welcome to DU sellitman Oct 2012 #14
Minorities have ID. ywcachieve Oct 2012 #60
Do you have pizza delivery? sellitman Oct 2012 #63
Appeal? barnabas63 Oct 2012 #15
I'm not sure they'd appeal, PRETZEL Oct 2012 #19
Of Course They Will Appeal AndyTiedye Oct 2012 #43
PA Rep. Daryl Metcalfe attributed "laziness" and a "lack of work ethic" to those... WorseBeforeBetter Oct 2012 #59
re:Judge halts Pa.'s tough new voter ID requirement allan01 Oct 2012 #16
THanks for the video clip....I was 7 years old again for a brief moment DebJ Oct 2012 #20
Yes! Yes!! YES!!! MgtPA Oct 2012 #17
halleluiah! some justice!! n/t DebJ Oct 2012 #18
Good news! Loryn Oct 2012 #21
Welcome to DU! cheezmaka Oct 2012 #56
Woohoo! Do you hear that??? Heather MC Oct 2012 #22
Wonderful news! Lisa D Oct 2012 #23
yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!! cosmicone Oct 2012 #24
this is great. barbtries Oct 2012 #25
Said it before and will say it again: Let's look to Canada for sane ID laws Patiod Oct 2012 #27
Don't forget to be thankful to this guy for tipping everyone off: rocktivity Oct 2012 #28
Perfect example of pride going before a fall. polichick Oct 2012 #30
Mike Turzai Shuhered Oct 2012 #36
Obama wins Pennsylvania!!! Shuhered Oct 2012 #66
. trailmonkee Oct 2012 #45
Voter Suppression is Mitt's Path to Victory/Priebus Shuhered Oct 2012 #31
"it is so sad for moderate Republicans"-----WTH?! CRY ME A RIVER. WinkyDink Oct 2012 #41
Here in PA, I've been hearing from friends worried about discrepancies ... gauguin57 Oct 2012 #32
Another with this same "Here in PA" "rumor"? Is "friends" a term now for "Republicans"? WinkyDink Oct 2012 #40
Repubs not liking this one Kingofalldems Oct 2012 #33
Oh yes, the whinefest has started durablend Oct 2012 #48
Thank the gods! Chemisse Oct 2012 #34
Is your dog rogrot Oct 2012 #38
Thanks! But she is just too lazy to follow politics. Chemisse Oct 2012 #65
Awesome. berni_mccoy Oct 2012 #35
Time for the Republican BS rogrot Oct 2012 #37
this has given the public an opportunity to see how spineless the gop is.. trailmonkee Oct 2012 #49
Now a new public education campaign is needed to ensure people without photo ID know they can vote Coyotl Oct 2012 #44
Very excellent news!!!! hue Oct 2012 #47
this is fantastic new..even my 90 year-old fundamentalist Christan Aunt who lives in Sharpsville, PA Douglas Carpenter Oct 2012 #50
wild The Jungle 1 Oct 2012 #51
Hey Turzai --- DONE!!! underpants Oct 2012 #53
I just wish the PA Dept. of State would read this decision..... mrmpa Oct 2012 #54
sort of. The judge ruled that voters can be asked for photo ID, but allowed to vote without it. robinlynne Oct 2012 #57
Unfortunately, they're still publicizing ID requirements as if this law was in effect... Rhiannon12866 Oct 2012 #61
let them blow their wad on ads that might net a few votes trailmonkee Oct 2012 #62
Wonderful! I don't think there is any way Rmoney wins PA now mvd Oct 2012 #64

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
3. Cool that's one more safe state, now we have to keep moving on all the other states that have
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 10:13 AM
Oct 2012

screwed up rules.

qanda

(10,422 posts)
5. Am I reading this wrong or will people without ID be issued a provisional ballot?
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 10:16 AM
Oct 2012

Doesn't sound like much of a win if that's the case.

On Edit: Never mind, there was some confusion from a post I read from the Post-Gazette on Facebook where they were talking about a partial injunction. Glad to see that it's completely halted.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
8. I don't see anything in that article
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 10:20 AM
Oct 2012

about provisional ballots. Where are you getting that info?

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
29. Regarding the provisional ballots...
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 11:41 AM
Oct 2012

this from ThinkProgress.org:

"Buried in the opinion is a line establishing that the requirement that voters without IDs cast only provisional ballots will also not be in effect during the November election. After describing a “transition” provision from January 1, 2012 until September 17, 2012 where voters who do not show ID may cast a ballot “without the necessity of casting a provisional ballot,” the judge concludes that “the injunction will have the effect of extending the express transition provisions of Act 18 through the general election.” The impact of this line is that voters without ID will cast normal, not provisional, ballots this November, but they will still be asked for ID."

Cosmocat

(14,566 posts)
46. The judge floated that
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 02:22 PM
Oct 2012

Some things he initially said indicated a full suspension.

He then said some things that indicated a partial suspension based on extending the period that provisional ballots would have to be counted.

This clown has no idea the chaos that level of provisional ballots would cause, and also in his ruling no idea how they work in most counties.

Hopefully, the powers to be realized it was too much to hammer this through in a presidential and redirected him.

underpants

(182,829 posts)
52. No provisional ballot but they can still be asked for ID
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 07:13 PM
Oct 2012

the judge is a jerk - he had to rule this way so he left that in there as means of adding confusion and intimidation

October

(3,363 posts)
55. Right? Am I wrong, or is it that they can ASK for ID, but you don't have to give it???? WTF?
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 08:00 PM
Oct 2012

This is so odd.

It's a victory, but leaves too much room for abuse IMHO.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
26. Here in PA, I've heard rumours such as you can be denied the right to vote
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 11:20 AM
Oct 2012

if your voter registration has your middle initial and your driver's license has your complete middle name. Ridiculous, I know, but even though I volunteer with the local Obama campaign, no one can confidently answer that question. Thank you, Republicans, for any confusion that you can add.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
39. YOU DON'T NEED AN ID, so "middle initial" is a non-issue. Question:
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 12:20 PM
Oct 2012

Why do you spell "rumors" in the Canadian/British fashion, if you are "here in PA"?

sellitman

(11,607 posts)
14. Welcome to DU
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 10:38 AM
Oct 2012

Nice to enter to such good news. Someday history will not be kind to the efforts of the GOP to stop the vote among minorities ,students and the elderly.

They will either have to change their platform or be relegated to the dust bin of history.

barnabas63

(1,214 posts)
15. Appeal?
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 10:42 AM
Oct 2012

If they try to get this appealed hopefully they couldn't get it overturned in time for the election. Anyone have insight on that process and timeline?

PRETZEL

(3,245 posts)
19. I'm not sure they'd appeal,
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 10:51 AM
Oct 2012

but, who am I to say.

As I read the article, what Simpson said is that the law itself is not unconstitutional, but the procedures that were in place did not leave sufficient time for total implimentation, thus leaving open the possibility for disenfranchisement.

AndyTiedye

(23,500 posts)
43. Of Course They Will Appeal
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 01:40 PM
Oct 2012

It's not as though the Repig superPACs are in any danger of running out of money.

They'll probably go for another of the USSC's famous "emergency" rulings to get this reinstated in time for the elections.

WorseBeforeBetter

(11,441 posts)
59. PA Rep. Daryl Metcalfe attributed "laziness" and a "lack of work ethic" to those...
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 09:51 PM
Oct 2012

unable to obtain an ID before the November election. Watch today's PBS NewsHour interview @ http://video.pbs.org/video/2286181996/# . This little shit tossed out all sorts of red meat for the Teabaggers -- activist judge, leftists, entitlement mentality, etc. -- and made it clear he has more time in office and will not give up on this.

He was also incredibly rude to Judith Browne Dianis, co-director of the Advancement Project, who just happens to be African-American. She was as classy and calm as can be.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/decision2012/pennsylvania-voter-id-law-enforcement-halted-by-judge/2012/10/02/bf240ffc-0c9d-11e2-bb5e-492c0d30bff6_story.html
By Robert Barnes, Updated: Tuesday, October 2, 8:57 PM

"State officials said they had not made a final decision about whether to appeal Simpson’s ruling to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. But a joint statement from Corbett and his secretary of state sounded as if they were preparing to give up the fight to use the law in the coming election."

Stay tuned...

allan01

(1,950 posts)
16. re:Judge halts Pa.'s tough new voter ID requirement
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 10:45 AM
Oct 2012

i ride with a fellow who listens to slush rimshod and co whilst going grocery shoppin. wonder if flush rush will give his usual "activist judge" speal.



way to go pa! and another one bites the dust

Lisa D

(1,532 posts)
23. Wonderful news!
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 11:09 AM
Oct 2012

I was afraid the judge would compromise by allowing the ridiculous provisional ballot option offered by Republicans. So glad he didn't go that route.

Patiod

(11,816 posts)
27. Said it before and will say it again: Let's look to Canada for sane ID laws
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 11:25 AM
Oct 2012

Two thirds of voters support voter ID laws, and frankly, I'm okay with them too, just so they're not draconian and dis-enfranchising (which, frankly, we all know is the point of them).

To reiterate, in Canada:
1) ONE official governement ID
OR
2) TWO other forms of ID
OR
3) someone from the precinct vouches for you uner oath. You can only vouch for ONE other person per election, and the person vouched for can't vouch for anyone else.

So there you have it. Grandma can use her SS card and a utility bill, Uncle Bob can use his Military ID, cousin Jen can use her out-of-state driver's license and a student ID (with or without expiration date), and your dopey, unorganized neighbor can use YOU to vouch that you've known him since he was a kid, and he's definitely a citizen even though he can never find anything in that house.


rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
28. Don't forget to be thankful to this guy for tipping everyone off:
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 11:29 AM
Oct 2012


Pennsylvania Republican House Leader Mike "NOT Done!" Turzai.


rocktivity

Shuhered

(200 posts)
36. Mike Turzai
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 12:12 PM
Oct 2012

This Caucasian guy's smug comment met with a receptive crowd who approved. He and the crowd seem to tacitly approve of the 47% that Mr. Romney refers to in his video. It is as if they have a collective thought amongst them that assuages their consciences by thinking something like, "Illiterate people are dumb and shouldn't have the right to vote anyway." This assumes, of course, that they have consciences. I myself am doubtful. Go Obama!!! My Iowa vote is mailed already!!!! But best of luck in the debate anyway!!!!

Shuhered

(200 posts)
66. Obama wins Pennsylvania!!!
Fri Oct 5, 2012, 02:58 AM
Oct 2012

Ok, I HOPE that he wins Pennsylvania. Criminal Republicans have no place in the political process.

Shuhered

(200 posts)
31. Voter Suppression is Mitt's Path to Victory/Priebus
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 11:52 AM
Oct 2012

Thank God the Pennsylvania judge agreed to have scruples and impartiality in the great state of Pennsylvania. Neither Party affiliation ever wants to be in bed with the idea of winning by lowering voter turnout from the opposing side. In this spectacularly atypical year, from a changing demographic standpoint, it is so sad for moderate Republicans who can only watch as their Party is and continues to be high-jacked by thugs with no long-term plan.

gauguin57

(8,138 posts)
32. Here in PA, I've been hearing from friends worried about discrepancies ...
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 12:01 PM
Oct 2012

... discrepancies between their names on their driver's licenses and their voter registration.

They've been worried sick that, after voting in every primary and general for decades, they'd be stopped at the gate by this law -- stopped from voting in an impossibly important election!

I hope it isn't appealed, though I know it will be -- because the GOP in PA admitted in front of God and everyone that this law was put into place -- with only a few months for everyone to get IDs -- ONLY to give the state to Romney.

In other words: Whew!

durablend

(7,460 posts)
48. Oh yes, the whinefest has started
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 02:55 PM
Oct 2012

Last edited Tue Oct 2, 2012, 04:41 PM - Edit history (1)

"Lazy shiftless dirtbag Dumbocats can't get off their ass and get an ID"

Just one of the choice tidbits.

To whit, I reply: "EAT SHIT REPUBLICANS!"

Chemisse

(30,813 posts)
65. Thanks! But she is just too lazy to follow politics.
Thu Oct 4, 2012, 04:00 PM
Oct 2012

She saves all of her little bit of energy for cuddling, lick kisses, and climbing up on the bed to sleep with us (3 is quite a crowd!).

 

rogrot

(57 posts)
37. Time for the Republican BS
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 12:16 PM
Oct 2012

to end. Several anti-worker, anti-middle class, anti-education "laws" passed by the Rep. legislature in MI have been overturned and are going thru the appeals process. What a waste of time and taxpayer money perpetrated by the self-righteous, small government, anti-tax Right! What a bunch of idiot phonies!

trailmonkee

(2,681 posts)
49. this has given the public an opportunity to see how spineless the gop is..
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 03:54 PM
Oct 2012

Don't know if you can put a price tag on that

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
44. Now a new public education campaign is needed to ensure people without photo ID know they can vote
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 01:43 PM
Oct 2012

That is one important line in the piece

Douglas Carpenter

(20,226 posts)
50. this is fantastic new..even my 90 year-old fundamentalist Christan Aunt who lives in Sharpsville, PA
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 04:34 PM
Oct 2012

was worried that she wouldn't be able to vote - because she no longer has a drivers license and has not needed a passport and therefore has no photo ID and it would have been a real big hassle for her to get one - given all the problems she has getting around. If that is her situation - I'm sure there are countless others. When all is done and said - all of these ID efforts are simply cynical maneuvers by the Republicans to try to change the results of elections.

 

The Jungle 1

(4,552 posts)
51. wild
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 06:42 PM
Oct 2012

What is wild is that republicans spent millions on this scam. The goal was to deliver Pa to Willard.
Willard gave up on Pa. weeks ago. These un-American fascist never stood a chance.

Our state is completely republican controlled and nothing is getting done.
Infrastructure is falling apart.
Schools are failing, charter schools are failing!
School funding is grossly unfair. (real estate taxes)
We have a pension bomb that is going to destroy the state and local budgets. The Pension bill was signed by a republican named Ridge. It has never been funded and we are in real trouble.
Corbett slashed healthcare for the poor.
The list is endless but all these republicans got done was this voter ID bill and a big fat give away bill for the gas frackers. I probably don't need to tell you this but the gas drillers are who funded Corbutts campaign.

mrmpa

(4,033 posts)
54. I just wish the PA Dept. of State would read this decision.....
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 07:58 PM
Oct 2012

All afternoon, I saw 6 commercials sponsored by the Dept. of State, repeating the lie that ID would be needed on Election Day. This judgement was made before 12 noon.

robinlynne

(15,481 posts)
57. sort of. The judge ruled that voters can be asked for photo ID, but allowed to vote without it.
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 08:27 PM
Oct 2012

This is going to cause widespread confusion. A lot of people may not vote. so it is a sort of good verdict.

Rhiannon12866

(205,503 posts)
61. Unfortunately, they're still publicizing ID requirements as if this law was in effect...
Tue Oct 2, 2012, 11:47 PM
Oct 2012

Voter suppression, anyone?

trailmonkee

(2,681 posts)
62. let them blow their wad on ads that might net a few votes
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 12:12 AM
Oct 2012

At this point it won't make much difference.... Imho

mvd

(65,174 posts)
64. Wonderful! I don't think there is any way Rmoney wins PA now
Wed Oct 3, 2012, 12:44 PM
Oct 2012

The PA Supreme Court sent it down to the judge for a ruling, so they won't be going against this.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge halts Pa.'s tough n...