US Chamber asks Treasury to clear up 'serious concerns' about payroll tax deferral
Source: The Hill
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce on Wednesday asked the Treasury Department to answer significant questions raised by President Trumps executive order allowing a deferral of payroll taxes.
-snip-
While the recently issued Executive Order (EO) on payroll tax deferral is well-intended to provide relief, it has raised serious concerns for both employers and employees, wrote Caroline Harris, the Chambers vice president of tax policy and economic development.
-snip-
While Trumps executive order may be a backdoor way of securing the payroll tax deferral, the lack of clear guidance as to how it would be implemented, who would be responsible for doing so and what would happen to deferred payments has raised major concerns among lawmakers and tax policy experts. The order also raises a slew of questions about how to handle bonuses, the pay of seasonal workers and employees who leave before the deferral period, Harris wrote.
-snip-
Harris also cited concerns about the substantial tax liability for employees at the end of the deferral period that threatens to impose serious hardships on employees who will face a large tax bill at the end of the deferral period.
Read more: https://thehill.com/policy/finance/511769-us-chamber-asks-treasury-to-clear-up-serious-concerns-about-payroll-tax
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)That EO is not worth the paper on a cardboard roller.
To have a Rethuglican leaning group like the USCC take you to task is pretty telling.
C_U_L8R
(45,002 posts)That's a stupid assumption right there.
maxrandb
(15,330 posts)Since it's now acceptable practice, I think the fucking Chamber of Commerce offices all over the country are the first place for Joe to send federal troops.
I would caution the Chamber boys though, tears and snot do tend to stain Brooks Brothers suits, and that teargas residue is hell to get out of your clothes.
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)40+ years.
magicarpet
(14,154 posts).... care of this. Dotted every I and crossed every t. That is what Kudlow said.
No nobody can figure the damn thing out.
Everyone in the administration has a different way of interpreting these bogus Executive Orders.
No wonder everyone is confused. This is why tax laws are not left to decide by only the executive branch. There is a check and balance of both houses of congress to make sure highly questionable and/or ambiguous tax changes or laws are not enacted by a bunch of buffoons who only screw up the works.
You can't run the federal government like a child's summer part time end of the driveway lemonade stand.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,320 posts)with the likely outcomes.
"President Trump today issued another three Executive Tantrums, saying he wants payroll taxes cut, unemployment benefits extended, and student loans suspended, and the credit for it all. Government lawyers will now take a look to see if they are in any way feasible, and then start talking to congressional members and law drafters, who have the real expertise in law and regulation setting, and those in all 50 states, to work out if there's any chance Trump could get his wishes. They acknowledged that this was bound to take time, and Trump would have lost interest by then and thrown tantrums about different topics."
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)Republican party.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,465 posts)Never question your god.
zentrum
(9,865 posts)When the pay-back comes due, no average person will be able to pay double to make up for the deferment.
What a vile way to defund SS and Medicare.
Maybe it will the inflection point that finally raises the cap and/or creates a version of Medicare for all.
TomCADem
(17,387 posts)it is not like the law has actually changed.
Justice
(7,188 posts)And public Employers will withhold b/c auditors will advise them to.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)and have been for several administrations. Their temporary nature (really only applicable until the next President decides to change or eliminate) make them poor tools lasting change. If Congress weren't perinnially dysfunctiona, adversarial, and ineffective, perhaps Presidents could work with them to put things in stone.