Leonard Cohen's Estate Slams GOP For Using 'Hallelujah' At RNC
Source: Huffington Post
The estate of Leonard Cohen said on Friday it was considering legal action over the use of the Canadian singer's "Hallelujah" at the Republican National Convention (RNC), calling it a brazen attempt to politicize the song.
A recording of "Hallelujah" by Tori Kelly was played during a fireworks display on Thursday night that followed President Donald Trump's acceptance speech for the Republican nomination.
A second, more operatic version, was performed on camera by American tenor Christopher Macchio.
Cohen's estate said in a statement that it was "surprised and dismayed" the song had been used, saying it had specifically denied the RNC's request to do so.
Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/leonard-cohen-hallelujah-rnc_n_5f4a6695c5b697186e36b7cc
They really don't give a shit any more about decorum nor have any degree of consciousness, they will do what they want regardless. That Nazi -like use of the White House and government landmarks sickened me and had too many echoes of Fascism in the 1930/40's.
bucolic_frolic
(43,176 posts)regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)...on how much control Cohen's estate has over his songs. In most cases, songwriters sell the rights to their songs to a publishing company in exchange for royalties, and the publishing house has full say over who they will allow to license the song (generally speaking, the only question they ask is "Did the check clear?" ). That's why, for example, The Beatles' "Revolution" wound up in a Nike ad, Sarah Palin's campaign used "Barracuda" despite the objections of the Wilson sisters, and John Fogerty's "Fortunate Son" got used in some sportswear or cologne ad (can't remember which) in which it was edited to make it sound like a flag-waving patriotic anthem.
Under The Radar
(3,404 posts)...they will do what ever they want. With Bill Barr on their side, how can he be stopped?
exboyfil
(17,863 posts)It seems Christopher Macchio might be in a bit of a pickle as well.
kag
(4,079 posts)Maybe one of the intrepid DU attorneys could help here?
AllaN01Bear
(18,247 posts)They really don't give a shit any more about decorum nor have any degree of consciousness, they will do what they want regardless. That Nazi -like use of the White House and government landmarks sickened me and had too many echoes of Fascism in the 1930/40's.
they never did nor they never will after trump.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)If you don't want a tinpot dictator using your music and lyrics to promote their personal interests.
If you don't want some bathtub gin producer using your painting on their bottle label.
If you don't want your photograph screenprinted onto a Walmart t-shirt.
If you don't want your essay plagiarized in a First Lady's speech.
Now, some may say some of these examples are "fair use" (nonprofit educational purposes, though obviously not the gin bottle or t-shirt). But artists need to protect their work. Some take it too far (I'm talking to you, Disney), but for all the garden variety creatives, they are rightfully given discretion in perpetuity for the use of their works. Even if you bought a painting for $12 million, you are not allowed to use it in any way except for your own viewing without the artist's or estate's permission. That's why we have ARS (Artists' Rights Society) and ASCAP (American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers).
PatrickforO
(14,576 posts)Funny how no really good artist wants anything to do with Trump and his minions. Leonard Cohen is one of my all time favorite poets and artists.
As an aside, I am 61 now, and the first time I heard "Dance me to the end of love," just recently, it moved me profoundly.
ancianita
(36,066 posts)Polybius
(15,428 posts)The most famous version is Jeff Buckley's in 1994. Pentatonix did an awesome version as well, in 2016.
SoFlaJet
(7,767 posts)even have to STEAL artist's music. Every one of us musicians know the rules, you aren't allowed to broadcast sell or use an artist's work without their knowledge and /or permission. It's not like the RNC can't AFFORD to pay the Cohen Estate that which they are due, that is of course if they were to even GET permission to use one of Leonard's songs. They like to step Canadian artists's material; Neil Young is a Canadian by birth and so is Leonard Cohen.
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)Every one of us musicians know the rules, you aren't allowed to broadcast sell or use an artist's work without their knowledge and /or permission.
...not quite. You're not allowed to broadcast, sell, or use an artist's work without written approval from whichever publishing house they sold it to, which nearly always involves paying a fee and nothing else. In the vast majority of cases, the artists themselves have no control over which people or groups are allowed to license their work, unless they're a big enough name to allow them the leverage to actually demand control/approval over which uses the song can be put to. And, frankly, at the time he wrote, and presumably sold the rights to, "Hallelujah," I very much doubt Cohen had that sort of leverage -- I mean, his own label refused to release the album it originally appeared on (famously, an executive at the label reportedly told him "We know you're great, Leonard, we just don't know if you're any good." ), and, for many years, that album was only available as an import from a small Canadian label.
packman
(16,296 posts)Initech
(100,080 posts)I feel like "Stranglehold" and "Wang Dang Sweet Poontang" would be far more appropriate songs for this administration than "Hallelujah".
NCjack
(10,279 posts)song writers and singers willing to help Trump. Very swallow pool of talent or too cheap to give Trump the deal he wants -- no charge.
jstephenj
(51 posts)It's so pathetic that the GOP feels the need to crib material from artists who are diametrically opposed to them. Couldn't they dip into Ted Nugent or Kid Rock's back catalog? Or perhaps the prolific work of talented christain christian rock musicians.
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)...and all Springsteen was able to do was make snarky comments about it during his concerts.
question everything
(47,486 posts)And, in contrast to Trump shady business deals, they will not be intimidates.
Warpy
(111,270 posts)it sounds about right to me.
However, I hope they sue the bastards.
heckles65
(549 posts)"Born in the U.S.A." is not about mindless patriotism, but the inability of a Vietnam veteran to fit in to the country he returned to. "Hallelujah" is about the contrast between the ecstasy of sex and the bitterness of a breakup. It is not a religious celebration song.
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)I mean, there's a truly ludicrous music video from Lindsey Sterling (who I used to have some respect for), in which she turns an instrumental version of the song into a f***ing Christmas Carol, culminating with a spoken close in which she invites listeners to enter into a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. Somehow, I don't think that's quite the kind of "relationship" Cohen was writing about...