At least 25 troops under investigation for terrorism in connection with Capitol riot
Source: USA Today
WASHINGTON At least 25 troops are under investigation for terrorism related to Wednesday's siege at the Capitol, according to a Defense official.
The troops are suspected of taking part in the insurrection that shut down Congress as it formalized President-elect Joe Biden's Electoral College victory, said the official, who was not authorized to comment on the law enforcement investigation. Five people died, including a Capitol Hill police officer, after the pro-Trump mob overwhelmed security lines.
Members of the military are sworn to protect the Constitution. It is not clear if they would face military courts martial or prosecution in civilian court.
We are engaged in identifying all of those who took part in breaching the Capitol, regardless of their affiliation, Justice spokesman Marc Raimondi said Sunday.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/at-least-25-troops-under-investigation-for-terrorism-in-connection-with-capitol-riot/ar-BB1cDuiO?li=BBnbcA1
Thekaspervote
(32,797 posts)Deuxcents
(16,351 posts)We hold our troops in esteem. Get em if they are found guilty
StClone
(11,688 posts)By the Capitol Riot Gang.
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)csziggy
(34,138 posts)"For next week's inauguration ceremony to ensure the are "not sympathetic to domestic terrorists," Crow said."
That is reassuring.
Jazzgirl
(3,744 posts)What if the people doing the reviews are actually the corrupt domestic terrorists? That would be scary!
csziggy
(34,138 posts)machoneman
(4,011 posts)ForgoTheConsequence
(4,869 posts)It's a community full of conspiracies and wingnuts.
Redleg
(5,845 posts)I have been out of uniform since 1992 but have followed some of the trends in voting among military members. First, Stars and Stripes polled active duty service members in Sep. 2020 and found that 52% of them intended to vote for Biden and 46% for Trump. As the military has gotten more diverse, support for less conservative politicians and political views has increased.
I am aware that there have been numerous cases of active military members participating in white-supremacist, neo-nazi, or other extremist right-wing causes and actions. I am also aware that Fox News has its own stable of retired military officers who are extreme wing-nuts and Trump fluffers. I don't believe this indicates a "community full of conspiracies and wingnuts." I do believe the military needs to do a better job of screening these wingnuts at initial entry and to take corrective actions when they do engage in these political activities which are forbidden by the UCMJ.
If you watch CNN and MSNBC, you will also see former military officials, usually generals, who have been quite critical of Trump and Trumpism. While individual military members might choose to engage in insurrection, it is inconceivable to me that units within the military would choose to do so. At the same time, I can also see that some military leaders would be reluctant to use military force against the insurrectionists and would rather see state and local law enforcement deal with this.
From my experience, and taking into account the active military officers that I still know, most unit commanders frown on the open and loud expression of extreme political views. When I served, while many of my fellow officers were conservatives, very few were extremists, and even fewer ever spoke about politics. The few that did were often shunned or told to keep their mouths shut.
I think that we liberals need to be careful assuming that the military is our enemy or that it sides with the insurrectionists. We should be cautious and observant in how military force is used and we should expect the military to keep these dangerous wing-nuts out of the service.
pfitz59
(10,391 posts)many of the crew supported Gore. They weren't vocal about it mainly because the Bush supporters were aggressively partisan. The military tends to be conservative, but is fifty fifty on party affiliation.
ForgoTheConsequence
(4,869 posts)I never painted everyone. I am speaking from personal experience. The enlisted class is full of conspiracy nuts and right-wingers, I don't know anything about the officer class.
Redleg
(5,845 posts)I agree that there is a problem with extremism in the military. I just don't know how wide-spread it is. I just don't think it is fair to characterize the military as being full of these dangerous nuts. I think the military should conduct some rigorous research to find out about these things (perhaps contract with appropriate civilian experts to conduct the research). I also think the military needs to make it a high priority to deal with extremist assholes and to prevent the already radicalized from enlisting or becoming commissioned officers.
I believe the same should go for police departments and federal law enforcement agencies. The one thing that bothers me about this is in how the institutions will define unacceptable viewpoints/beliefs/etc. Unacceptable behavior is easier to define. I am concerned about the perception that the military and law enforcement agencies would be undertaking a "purge." I think we would have to be very careful about how to go about righting the ship.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)58Sunliner
(4,410 posts)They were the ones in charge along with Sund. That is what I worry about as well. They already failed once.
SunSeeker
(51,726 posts)IsItJustMe
(7,012 posts)reACTIONary
(5,788 posts)reACTIONary
(5,788 posts)https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/01/10/25-troops-under-investigation-terrorism-related-riot-capitol/6618295002/
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)BobTheSubgenius
(11,571 posts)I've long believed that active-duty service people are always subject to UCMJ and not civilian law. At least, not primarily. I have a nagging and much less firm sense that the military gets the first crack at prosecution.
I realize I could be wrong on one or both counts.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)UCMJ covers most on base offenses but if you commit a crime off-post you will be charged by civilian police. Usually when you are in trouble with the local police the military will also punish you too.
pfitz59
(10,391 posts)Hearsay is admissible. The mere appearance of wrongdoing is enough to get shit-canned (for the good of the service).
Bayard
(22,168 posts)"Members of the military are sworn to protect the Constitution." And we've been saying the military would not follow unlawful orders from trump.
Redleg
(5,845 posts)individuals, on the other hand, may find an excuse to ignore their oath. I don't think the military as a whole or in large units would follow an unlawful order from Trump, especially when it is clear that Trump and his supporters are acting un-constitutionally.
C Moon
(12,221 posts)The smart ones didn't show up, they only set things up. Those are the ones the FBI needs to begin digging deeper on. And those are the dangerous ones.
AllaN01Bear
(18,443 posts)discharged and sent to levanworth prison for the rest of their days .