In a tacit break with Trump, House Republicans will not formally lobby against his impeachment.
Source: New York Times
House Republican leaders have decided not to formally lobby members of the party against voting to impeach President Trump, making a tacit break with him as they scrambled to gauge support within their ranks for a vote on Wednesday to charge him with inciting violence against the country.
While Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the minority leader, has said that he will personally oppose impeachment and sought to steer Republicans in a different direction, his decision not to officially lean on lawmakers to vote against the move constituted a subtle shift away from the president. In the past including the last time Mr. Trump was impeached by the House Mr. McCarthy and House leaders have lobbied Republicans intensely to stand behind Mr. Trump on nearly every issue, demanding the same degree of absolute loyalty that the president himself has required.
In the Senate, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, has also conspicuously declined to defend Mr. Trump in any way or to speak out against the impeachment push, which if it resulted in a Senate conviction could bar the president from holding public office again. Two Senate Republicans had already called upon the president to resign, and advisers privately speculated that a dozen or so more could ultimately favor convicting the president at trial.
If all senators were voting, 17 Republicans would have to join Democrats to convict Mr. Trump of high crimes and misdemeanors; if they did so, only a majority would be required to disqualify him from being elected again. Mr. Trump has offered Republicans few reasons to rally around him. Speaking about the attack for the first time in days on Tuesday, he expressed no remorse and said his speech encouraging his supporters to march to the Capitol and confront Congress immediately before the rampage had been totally appropriate. It was the specter of his impeachment, he said, that was causing tremendous anger.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/live/2021/01/12/us/impeachment-trump-25th-amendment/in-a-tacit-break-with-trump-house-republicans-will-not-formally-lobby-against-his-impeachment
Half-assed cowardly decision.
FoxNewsSucks
(10,434 posts)Exactly what one would expect from a bunch of craven half-assed cowards.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Mme. Defarge
(8,036 posts)njhoneybadger
(3,910 posts)StClone
(11,686 posts)Can we scrape together enough courage for the future of America?
TheRickles
(2,069 posts)Mike 03
(16,616 posts)Thune
Sasse
Grassley (I know, but I have my reasons for thinking he might go for it)
...?
Doubtful but maybes:
Cotton (for strategic reasons of course, not to do the right thing)
Cornyn
BumRushDaShow
(129,228 posts)Sasse
Murkowski
Thune
Collins
Burr
Maybes:
Paul
Toomey
Ernst (I know)
I added Portman to it since he refused to go along with the objections to the Electoral College although out of the other side of his mouth, he has done the usual insult Democrats shtick. Someone suggested Turtle. Not sure about him but he has refused to speak to or meet with 45 for months.
groundloop
(11,520 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,228 posts)there would be 2 GOP Senators not there (Loeffler and Perdue). GA is expected to certify the election of Warnock and Ossoff by January 22nd from what I understand. But I know these trials can take a long time if they choose to actually go through that whole process.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)Link to tweet
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Mike 03
(16,616 posts)he believes we have the votes.
But like most of us, I'm skeptical but hopeful.
Massacure
(7,525 posts)The number I've seen floated around is 10-12 republican votes.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)RainCaster
(10,904 posts)BobTheSubgenius
(11,564 posts)SOOO hopeful, but history has given us little comfort of that fond wish coming true.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)Because it will make it easier 'to purge' Trump from the party.
I think the Senate would convict if they can be called to meet before the 19th.
SledDriver
(2,059 posts)Ford_Prefect
(7,914 posts)They said it to them in caucus but the threat was no less genuine. Voting against the president is the same as voting against the party, and no one who does that remains a Republican who gets committee assignments and other perks of office, along with GOP funding and strategy.
PatrickforO
(14,585 posts)Tacit, indeed. These people are a huge part of the problem.
dawn5651
(604 posts)KS Toronado
(17,284 posts)Don't drag me into this mess, it's every man/woman for themselves. Go survey your voters and decide
your own best path to reelection.
Lonestarblue
(10,030 posts)She reported that he said something like the Republican Party needed to excise Trump from the party. I hope thats an accurate report. It doesnt actually sound like McConnell.
BumRushDaShow
(129,228 posts)Tommymac
(7,263 posts)He can wear them on his anus mouth. Ugh, he is one ugly person.
COL Mustard
(5,913 posts)To be remembered as great statesmen and women for their principled act of political courage.
maddogesq
(1,245 posts)this should be a no-brainer.
Fellas, you got your tax cuts and lotsa judges. Throwing DT under the bus gives you an out come election time...makes you look heroic despite the fact that you have enabled the sociopath for the last 4 years.
bucolic_frolic
(43,236 posts)They have a lot of questions to answer, and Democrats have to frame the issue and bring it. Big time.