FDA review confirms safety and efficacy of single-shot Johnson & Johnson coronavirus vaccine
Source: Washington Post
A Food and Drug Administration review released Wednesday of the single-shot coronavirus vaccine made by pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson found it was safe and effective and completely prevented hospitalizations and deaths in a large clinical trial. The review sets the stage for a third coronavirus vaccine to be authorized as soon as this weekend, a point of hope in the middle of a pandemic that has killed more than a half-million people in the United States.
The review, though positive, was more nuanced than regulators assessments of the first two coronavirus vaccines, reflecting a pandemic that has entered a more complicated phase as variants capable of slipping by some aspects of immunity have emerged. The Johnson & Johnson vaccine was more than 85 percent effective at preventing severe illness, including in a region dominated by a concerning variant, but only 66 percent protective overall when moderate cases were included.
The FDA scientists found that the known benefits of the vaccine included reducing the risk of symptomatic and severe cases of covid-19 at least two weeks after vaccination. The review found vaccine efficacy against severe covid-19 was similarly high across the United States, South Africa, and Brazil.
We know this vaccine prevents 85 percent of the severe disease.
It was 100 percent effective in preventing hospitalization and deaths, and thats really whats important, said Nancy M. Bennett, a professor of medicine and public health sciences at the University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry. Those facts are the most important thing to recognize.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2021/02/24/johnson-and-johnson-vaccine/
Full headline: FDA review confirms safety and efficacy of single-shot Johnson & Johnson coronavirus vaccine, especially against severe cases
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)and has the distribution to get it out there.
ProfessorGAC
(65,111 posts)If approved before March 1, which it likely will be.
That's a pretty aggressive start-up curve.
I haven't seen what their forecasted per day production will be when fully operating.
Pfizer & Moderna are both forecasting 1.5-2.0 million doses a day.
ProfessorGAC
(65,111 posts)...is that the J&J vax is single dose. So a million doses a day is 30 million people!
I don't know what % of their production is for use in the US, though.
LizBeth
(9,952 posts)BadgerKid
(4,554 posts)Lots of holes to poke in this, but I just wanted to get some idea. I just googled for the numbers.
US population: 330M (252M adults, or ~76%)
Then you have 66M doses already given out (bloomberg.com); probably that's not 33M people, but assume it is the equivalent for the sake of argument.
Herd immunity is thought to be 70-90%, 153.3M-197.1M people needed to be fully vaccinated.
JNJ+Pfizer+Moderna person equivalent fully vaccinated per day: 2.17M-2.67M anticipated (supposedly 1.30M doses per day is current rate)
Calculated Herd immunity among adults only: 8-13 weeks (12-15 weeks for 100% of adults)
Wishful thinking suggests a well-executed vaccination plan could result in seeing a good sized dent in cases in May, but realistically it will probably take until some time in the summer. And then one wonders if children will be vaccinated, or we all just keep wearing masks for a while.
chowder66
(9,074 posts)While the rate of unexpected side effects was similar between the vaccine and placebo groups, there was a slight imbalance of some reactions in the vaccine group to those who received a placebo. The vaccine group reported 15 cases of embolic and thrombotic events, or blood clots, among 14 recipients, compared with 10 in the placebo group.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/24/covid-vaccine-these-are-the-most-common-side-effects-from-jjs-.html
BumRushDaShow
(129,237 posts)this one was actually created using a "benign" coronavirus (vs the current Pfizer/Moderna that don't use any viral material at all).
chowder66
(9,074 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,237 posts)but was unable to get the needed efficacy from their test/trial candidates, so they pulled out temporiarily but hope to have something by the end of this year.