Marjorie Taylor Greene offers bills to fire Fauci, ban vaccine passports
Source: The Hill
BY TAL AXELROD - 04/01/21 12:27 PM EDT
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) introduced two bills Thursday that would eliminate Anthony Faucis salary and ban vaccine passports.
Greenes "Fire Fauci Act" would cut the salary for Fauci, the governments leading infectious disease expert, to zero. It is unclear if such a cut could be authorized even if the legislation is passed.
According to the conservative firebrand, the cut would be made until a new director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is confirmed by the Senate. However, the NIAID directors appointment is not subject to Senate confirmation.
The "We Will Not Comply Act" would ban vaccine passports documents that show that Americans have been vaccinated by prohibiting businesses engaged in interstate commerce from using them to allow patrons to access their services.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/house/545992-marjorie-taylor-greene-offers-bills-to-fire-fauci-ban-vaccine-passports
underpants
(182,839 posts)Maeve
(42,282 posts)The empty wagon makes the most noise
liberalgunwilltravel
(328 posts)How much longer do we have to deal with this dim Mitch?
"According to the conservative farkwad, the cut would be made until a new director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) is confirmed by the Senate. However, the NIAID directors appointment is not subject to Senate confirmation."
CrispyQ
(36,482 posts)In all their arrogance, they never thought that would happen. And since they can't win without the deplorables, they don't have a lot of choice but to stand quietly on the sidelines & let their party be hijacked. To their credit, the right has bested us on messaging so much over the past 40 years, that many die-hard repubs will never vote dem. We can only hope they vote 3rd party or stay home.
Trueblue1968
(17,229 posts)gohuskies
(1,156 posts)Crawl back into her hidey hole and accept her permanent exile.
pazzyanne
(6,556 posts)So far, she has done nothing but made our former pResident look smart. I've had enough of that already!
gohuskies
(1,156 posts)spewing bs about Dr. Fauci and suggesting Covid vacciine cards as some kind of human rights infringement is simply beyond stupid. she is a useless representative to her district.
needs to be institutionalized.
Was it Abe Lincoln that said: It is better to be thought of as being stupid, than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt.....
Initech
(100,083 posts)SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)has ever come from the "mind" of MTG. This is the best you'll ever get from that Trump-humping dullard.
cab67
(2,993 posts)from passing a bill requiring drivers in the UK to drive on the right side of the road? Or cutting the salary of the CEO of Delta Airlines?
This is embarrassingly ignorant. If the voters of her district want someone representing their perspective, OK - but one would think that such a representative would at least have the good sense to find out if legislation she's about to propose is, like, actually within Congressional authority.
I'm not worried about the bills themselves. They're not going anywhere. I am, however, worried that this particular congresswoman is wasting everyone's time with poorly-informed theatrics that do no good to anyone.
Lonestarblue
(10,024 posts)The more press time she gets, even for ridiculous things that demonstrate how lacking she is in brain power, the more famous she becomes. Like Trump, she sees an opportunity to trade on notoriety. She has no policies other than revolt against the government to try become another cult leader of the ignorant and uninformed.
PatSeg
(47,517 posts)so she has to do or say something ridiculous to get her name back in the news. That is really her sole purpose of being in DC.
PortTack
(32,778 posts)If dotard cant hold the spot light, why would she?
SWBTATTReg
(22,144 posts)if someone's been vaccinated or not. Otherwise, the businesses are not going to hire people.
She is such a moron.
louis-t
(23,295 posts)Claire Oh Nette
(2,636 posts)How do either of these pieces of petty, retaliatory legislation *help* the people of Georgia 14?
This whole class of GOP congressmen seem to think their job is to heckle and distract from the national conversation. They appear to be doing NOTHING for their actual constituents.
DOesn't fund health care. DOesn't open schools. DOesn't help small business, doesn't reform anything for the better. It's 7th grade name calling.
Fire the smartest guy who's [pretty much been right all along, and prevent local business from protecting themselves from possible liability or infection.
She's an attention whore. The girl who did not make the cheer squad, but sleeps with all the football players to be "popular" among a tiny percentage of kids at school.
Frivolous is too kind for what she is.
Politicub
(12,165 posts)is accomplishing nothing that will help them.
Hugh Bloody Bastards
(71 posts)From a cannon would be my personal preference.
COL Mustard
(5,906 posts)Hugh Bloody Bastards
(71 posts)I don't give a damn that your high-priced lawyer got you acquitted! I know 'twas you who murdered Mr Boddie in the Kitchen with the Candlestick!
COL Mustard
(5,906 posts)Just don't ask what Miss Scarlet and I were doing in the lounge!
monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)if this what republican's has for the brain dept. , they are in deep shit !
Nululu
(842 posts)CaptainTruth
(6,594 posts)A simple, true message that I've been repeating over & over.
Mr.Bill
(24,304 posts)Big Government to tell businesses what they can and can't do.
Digital Puppy
(496 posts)Someone needs to grab their crazy cousin. She back off her meds again.
Scalded Nun
(1,236 posts)All they know how to do is to dismantle, destroy and obstruct. They would not recognize true governance if their lives depended on it. She is a part of the whole, and the whole thing is rotten.
hibbing
(10,098 posts)Uh yeah, okay, if that is how you want to describe her, makes her sound rather sane.
Peace
DBoon
(22,372 posts)usaf-vet
(6,189 posts)...... anyone from a country that doesn't have official government proof of having the required vaccinations to enter the country?
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,513 posts)Well, number one:
A bill of attainder (also known as an act of attainder or writ of attainder or bill of penalties) is an act of a legislature declaring a person, or a group of persons, guilty of some crime, and punishing them, often without a trial. As with attainder resulting from the normal judicial process, the effect of such a bill is to nullify the targeted person's civil rights, most notably the right to own property (and thus pass it on to heirs), the right to a title of nobility, and, in at least the original usage, the right to life itself. Bills of attainder passed in Parliament by Henry VIII on 29 January 1542 resulted in the executions of a number of notable historical figures.
The use of these bills by Parliament eventually fell into disfavour due to the obvious potential for abuse and the violation of several legal principles, most importantly the right to due process, the precept that a law should address a particular form of behaviour rather than a specific individual or group, and the separation of powers.
{snip}
United States
Colonial era
Bills of attainder were used throughout the 18th century in England, and were applied to British colonies as well. Some colonists were inspired to the American Revolution because of anger at the injustice of attainder. Although at least one American state, New York, used a 1779 bill of attainder to confiscate the property of British loyalists (called Tories) as both a penalty for their political sympathies and means of funding the rebellion, American dissatisfaction with British attainder laws resulted in their being prohibited in the U.S. Constitution ratified in 1789.
Constitutional bans
Excerpt from Article One, Section 9 of the United States Constitution, prohibiting the passing of bills of attainder
The United States Constitution forbids legislative bills of attainder: in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10. The fact that they were banned even under state law reflects the importance that the Framers attached to this issue.
Within the U.S. Constitution, the clauses forbidding attainder laws serve two purposes. First, they reinforced the separation of powers, by forbidding the legislature to perform judicial or executive functions since the outcome of any such acts of legislature would of necessity take the form of a bill of attainder. Second, they embody the concept of due process, which was partially reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 is "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed".
{snippety, snippety, snip}
Griefbird
(96 posts)She's irrelevant.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,513 posts)You'd better believe I care about her.
Welcome to DU.
Biophilic
(3,666 posts)Just like the Real Housewives of where ever or Keeping up with the Kardashians, neither of which I've ever watched but still know about. How can you not know about them, which is the whole purpose... that plus making money off of people so bored they're willing to watch other peoples' lives. It's just a new TV show.
Beastly Boy
(9,376 posts)You can't expect any different from her until hell freezes over.
George II
(67,782 posts)....doesn't even know that Fauci's position isn't confirmed by the Senate.
What a dolt.
BobTheSubgenius
(11,564 posts)Can Congress not ban MTG? She almost makes me long for the days of Caribou Barbie.
COL Mustard
(5,906 posts)To $1. I'm not sure if it's still on the books, or if it was overturned through legal appeals, or if it was ever enforced.
Edited to add: This was the Holman Rule, enacted in 1876. Apparently it was rescinded when the Democrats retook the House.
Link to Wikipedia article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holman_Rule
tanyev
(42,573 posts)Historic NY
(37,451 posts)also known by Republicans at the Nut job Caucus
monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,354 posts)Unless a committee chair has a sense of humor, and brings them forward to a vote.
Initech
(100,083 posts)I don't want some diseased jackass who refuses to get a vaccine sitting next to me in public no matter what the situation, and I felt this way ever since before COVID.
renate
(13,776 posts)What an infantile approach to the world.
area51
(11,912 posts)monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,200 posts)Captain Zero
(6,811 posts)does she? Since she was put off all her committee assignments?