Elon Musk's SpaceX wins contract to develop spacecraft to land astronauts on the moon
Source: Washington Post
Space
Elon Musks SpaceX wins contract to develop spacecraft to land astronauts on the moon
The company beat out Jeff Bezos Blue Origin and Dynetics, a defense contractor
By Christian Davenport
April 16, 2021 at 1:37 p.m. EDT
NASA on Friday selected Elon Musks SpaceX to build spacecraft that would land astronauts on the moon for the first time since the last Apollo mission, according to a source selection document obtained by The Washington Post.
The contract marks another major victory for the hard-charging company that vaults it to the top tier of the nations aerospace companies and solidifies it as one of the space agencys most trusted partners.
In winning the $2.9 billion contract, SpaceX beat out Jeff Bezos Blue Origin, which had formed what it called a national team by partnering with aerospace giants Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman and Draper. SpaceX also won over Dynetics, a defense contractor based in Huntsville, Ala. (Bezos owns The Washington Post.)
NASA had originally chosen all three companies for the initial phase of the contract, and was expected to choose two of them to build the lunar lander. In other major programs, NASA has chosen multiple providers to foster competition and to ensure it has redundancy in case one cant deliver.
{snip}
Christian Davenport
Christian Davenport covers the defense and space industries for The Washington Post's Financial desk. He joined The Post in 2000 and has served as an editor on the Metro desk and as a reporter covering military affairs. He is the author of "The Space Barons: Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and the Quest to Colonize the Cosmos" (PublicAffairs, 2018). Follow https://twitter.com/wapodavenport
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/04/16/nasa-lunar-lander-contract-spacex/
SpaceX wins NASA contract to build spacecraft to fly astronauts to the moon
Link to tweet
soothsayer
(38,601 posts)dalton99a
(81,513 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)That's because it's designed as a Mars colonization vehicle.
It should open up interesting possibilities for ambitious Moon missions.
Yavin4
(35,441 posts)nycbos
(6,034 posts)Miguelito Loveless
(4,465 posts)"One white cat short of a Bond villain."
He then showed up at a Halloween party with a stuffed white toy cat.
nycbos
(6,034 posts)Initech
(100,079 posts)Initech
(100,079 posts)Tom Yossarian Joad
(19,230 posts)OxQQme
(2,550 posts)Also repairing an abandoned coal mine here:
NNadir
(33,523 posts)AZ8theist
(5,470 posts)And Starlink is anything but junk. It will provide internet service world wide. And hopefully A LOT cheaper than the price gouging crappy service we have in the US today.
You may not like Musk (I don't either) but he's no doubt an innovator and building for the future.
NNadir
(33,523 posts)AZ8theist
(5,470 posts)But "obscenities'" is ridiculous. Perhaps you prefer gas guzzling SUVs...
NNadir
(33,523 posts)I know the laws of thermodynamics.
I know how lithium batteries are made. I know where and how the metals in them are mined, and by whom.
I know where copper is mined and how its refined.
I know polymer chemistry. Every damned week, I come across at least 15 or 20 scientific papers on the subject of battery chemistry.
And...and...and...knowing the second law of thermodynamics, and having spent the last 30 or so years understanding how electricity is made, I know that this ass's car for millionaires and billionaires is obscene.
It's a three card monty game, and the bourgeois people falling for it are simply oblivious.
The worship of this libertarian creep, Musk, by people nominally on the left, astounds, amazes, and frankly, disgusts me.
Have a nice weekend.
AZ8theist
(5,470 posts)NNadir
(33,523 posts)AZ8theist
(5,470 posts)Do I assume you are against ALL electric vehicles? Or just a visceral hatred of Musk?
NNadir
(33,523 posts)...a thermodynamic scam of the worst kind, a kind of lie we tell ourselves to pretend that we really give a shit about the future.
Clearly we don't.
People seem to have a fantasy that electricity is clean, focusing on stupid marketing pictures of wind turbines that will be landfill in 20 years, and solar cells that will be electronic waste in 25 years, and pretending that the overall bulk of all the world's electricity isn't generated by the combustion of dangerous fossil fuels. Increasingly though it is. In fact, coal has been the fastest growing source of energy in the 21st century, although its growth has slowed in favor of fracked gas, the wreckage of which will be with all future generations, in fact for, well, forever. But we tell ourselves gas is "clean," and it is "transitional."
It is neither.
Now the huckster Elon Musk is worse than most electric car manufacturers, because he seeks and gets worship for being a complete asshole, but the broader idea, divorced from that consummately consumerist bullshit artist, that electric cars are "green" and/or "sustainable" is just oblivious horseshit.
I hope I told you how I really feel.
AZ8theist
(5,470 posts)I agree your perspective is one that is not talked about enough, if at all.
Food for thought.
hunter
(38,316 posts)Ordinary humans will never have a significant presence in space beyond lower earth orbit.
If our current world civilization doesn't collapse (which seems unlikely...) the solar system will belong to our intellectual offspring, engineered beings who can walk around on the surface of the Moon or Mars naked.
Maybe if we raise them kindly they'll bring a few of us along for the ride.