White House discussing tweaks to D.C. statehood bill to 'allay concerns' in Senate
Source: Washington Post
The White House is talking to members of Congress about potential changes to the D.C. statehood bill that could reduce opposition in the Senate, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Thursday.
The Biden administrations involvement in negotiating the bills future follows its strong endorsement of D.C. statehood last month, just before the Washington, D.C. Admission Act was approved by the House on a strict party-line vote.
The bills odds are much steeper in the evenly divided Senate, with Republicans dismissing D.C. statehood as an unconstitutional Democratic power grab.
Our view is that admitting D.C. as a state is well within Congresss power and that the arguments to the contrary are faulty, Psaki said during a White House news briefing. But we also think there are ways to allay the concerns that have been raised. And thats why were working with Congress to make the bill as strong as possible.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/white-house-discussing-tweaks-to-dc-statehood-bill-to-allay-concerns-in-senate/ar-BB1gHgYX?ocid=DELLDHP&li=BBnb7Kz
bucolic_frolic
(43,191 posts)Apportion those 700,000 Democratic votes over 50 states, 14,000 to each state, that should make a difference.
keithbvadu2
(36,829 posts)What does Moscow Mitch want?
That D.C. residents only count as 3/5 of a person?
???
groundloop
(11,519 posts)NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)The DC statehood bill shrinks the federal district to only federally owned land. So if the bill passes, the federal district would still have its electoral votes, but the only people living there would be the president and his family. So one family would decide 3 electoral votes.
The 'tweak' is an amendment to the statehood bill to give the 3 electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote rather than having a 'popular vote' of 2-3 people in the federal district.
(And the bill already has language calling for the repeal of the 23rd Amendment but that will take longer.)
Polybius
(15,437 posts)How would this SC rule?
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)No popular vote mandated (just like states).
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)...since it was no longer a non-state territory?
My guess is that the only acceptable "compromise" for Republicans would be if they simultaneously allowed the rural eastern half of deep-blue Oregon or Washington to become a separate state as well, giving them two more safe Senate seats in exchange for the two safe Senate seats we'd pick up from D.C. Nothing, and I mean nothing, else would be satisfactory to Republicans, as any D.C. statehood would tip the balance of Senate power to the Democratic side.
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)The DC Statehood Bill would shrink the district to only federal property. The State of DC (whatever they call it) would have its electoral votes as a state. But the federal district, constitutionally, also gets electoral votes -- even if it just consists of federal buildings. The issue is that the only people who would live in the district would be, essentially, the president and Vice President and their family.
Anyway, you're right, the GOP will never vote for it.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)I thought Trump voted absentee, either in NY or FL. Or both.
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)... they would vote in the "seat of government".